If they truly believed in science they wouldn't be Democrats.

Everything that they "know" about science and the natural world they learned through Disney & Bill Nye, not any first hand observation.

Because when all is said and done . . . most of these virtue signalling and self-righteous leftists really only go by feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelings. They decide what they FEEL to BE correct and then cherry pick bits and pieces of 'sicence' that usually does not even match up with each other and then call THAT mishmash of a conglomeration that they have artificially stitched together . . . Settled Science.

I'm interested to know how pro-choice supporters view "ending human life" as opposed to "killing the unborn." As you've noticed and pointed out, terminology is law. Because something is legal that makes it right. Because something is illegal that makes it wrong. Because you call something that it is not, it makes it ok. It's not a baby, it's a cluster of cells, or a zygote, or a fetus. Therefore it's ok to kill it because it's not actually alive yet. My argument is that it's a human life, and an innocent one at that. Full of potential. Is it ok to end an innocent human life? Once sperm joins egg and DNA replicates, 2 cells become 4, then 4 become 8. That process happens independent of the mother's body, yes it is nourished and supported by the mother, but the process is independent. That to me makes an individual human life. In this light, the abortion argument becomes harder to support.

Just my thoughts, have a good one friend.

Yes, they call it a "fetus" or a "zygote" because they don't want to call it a human being. This detaches any emotional trigger they might have by calling it a human. There's a reason they push for not having the mother see the child in the womb before termination of that child.

"If we don't see it or think of it as a child, then it won't matter if we stick a rod into its brain and pump acid into it."

:0)

That isn't a reason to kill a child.

It develops a nervous system as early as 4-6 weeks. They can feel starting around that time. Where in the hell do you even get that bogus info about 28 weeks?

And calling it a fetus is a way to ignore the child inside and not feel any emotion to killing that child.

Oh looky here, some dumb idiot who has no argument resorts to saying, "ok boomer." What are you? 10?

I stated facts and you came back with "ok boomer." Nobody says that anymore dummy.

Who was it? Either they took it down or the mods did.

I don't know who it was. Some random kid with a name I never saw before. They get on here, post a few dumb comments, then delete their page. Then they'll be back on with another profile doing the same thing.

Yeah, that's an old trick that sucks. I've seen in the streams set up where it will block people from commenting if their account is less than 60 or 90 days old. Maybe we should try that here?

Also please
Where are your sources of information for your "facts"?

I hate science class but I have plenty of good reasons to support my beliefs.¨Unborn babies¨ literally can't even think they aint even babies and if someone about to get an abortion they probably have a really good reason.Maybe they don't want that kid to be miserable in an orphanage or they can't care for it not to mention overpopulation.Why u guys always attack specifically trans women which by the way ARE backed up by science! i'll put some sources.Gender is a social construct.Its not like we were created knowing women cook and like pink man drink beer and like blue.Humans are complex we can know more than that, also how blind, and ignorant do you have to be to think we don't contribute to pollution, and climate change!Seriously though not to be too mean politics got enough of that, but you are very idiotic if you believe all this!We are killing the animals and plant at a concerning rate.Big companies only care about money and they will destroy their own planet for it(EAT THE RICH!)They put out crazy amounts of toxic stuff in our air, however It's not just the big rich people.While it's mostly them assholes that litter are also not helping
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-

transphobia/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01237-z
the thought of more than one gender has also been around for quite a while.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS9wmO4mMZM
Now please give me some easily disprovable reasons to why I'm wrong I won't shy away from an argument!

i completely agree with you.

I won't repeat myself on the abortion issue since I already stated my opinion.

Gender is biology. Men cannot get pregnant, no matter how you redefine titles. A male who was born a male cannot give birth, ever, at any point, no matter what type of drugs are used. You can call yourself a female then claim you got pregnant as a male, but that doesn't make you an actual male that got pregnant.

If humans have control of the climate, it's miniscule in comparison to natural climate change. Humans do not effect the climate as much as those in power claim. It's nothing but a power grab and get rich for the elites quick scheme. According to these loonies we should have been dead long ago.

When my 6th grade teacher told me that some people didnt believe in man made climate change this isnt what I expected.
I mean, c'mon even a 10 year old is smarter then you

"THAN you ..." If you're going to insult me, make sure you're smarter than me.

Good job Chad, thump that kid.

Oh come on. Grammar? You just tuned out everything I said besides my grammar? Everyone is smart in their own way. To a extent. And something just tells me you arent very smart at all if you dont understand. Natural global warming is in waves that are similar. In the recent years it has been shooting up without a drop continuously. This is affected by the carbon we produce from machines. The carbon adding to the natural gases allowed it to shoot up in charts. There are other variables but I think this is enough info. That was from memory. please do more research before making a statement so you dont end up looking like a fool

You're falling for bogus bullshit. There are many, many scientists who know what they're talking about that debunk this bullshit all the time. Humans have very little affect on the climate change. The Sun, volcanoes, etc have much more impact. And we can't control that.

This climate change bullshit is just the rich and powerful trying to control us and steal even more money from us.

It's funny how China and India are the biggest contributors to pollution and yet we pay more into the Climate Accord bullshit than all other countries combined.

recent science has claimed that they might be able to trap the carbon released with kelp. i hope that was true, cuz we will all die by 2070.

By 2070 I'll be 92 so I wouldn't care.

https://i.imgflip.com/5deel1.jpg
Where even is your evidence?

Wow, talk about your bias websites. What's next, Wikipedia?

The Earth's climate has been changing since the dawn of time. Humans are nothing more than a blip on the radar. Any idiot claiming humans are 100% responsible for climate change is an idiot I don't listen to.

Are you even aware of how much carbon is released into the atmosphere just from one volcano eruption?

Valcanos actually lower climate change

This is where Google is all wrong. There is and always has been one thing that has more influence on our climate than anything else. The sun. To say that man is even responsible for 1% of any change in climate is just not science.

In fact in looking back over the atmospheric history of the earth we are in a massive CO2 deficit. The planet used to have a lot more CO2 than we do now.

IF the planet is warming (which it actually hasn't been) and IF it is caused by an increase in CO2 then that will mean longer growing seasons with higher crop yields. That is actually a good thing, not a bad thing.

The history of this planet has had climate extremes. The earth was an ice planet and planet that was too hot for life. None of that was caused by mankind.

Incidentally the sun may go into a solar minimum. It is believed that when sun spots decrease or stop appearing that the effect it has on the earth is global cooling. Both the Dalton (1790 to 1830) and Maunder minimums (1645 to 1715) produced mini-ice ages - which, is it was - an inconvenient fact that Al Gore ignored in his propaganda movie, "An Inconvenient Truth". He also overlooked the global warming that happened in the medieval times when he developed his "hockey stick" graph showing how the earth is going to burn to a crisp any second now.

If prognosticating about future weather patterns is now science and we are all going to burn up then why are the only solutions that are proposed is to micromanage the life of everyone on the planet? How is sharing my house with strangers going to cool the planet down? How is telling me that I can only work a set number of miles away from my house going to save mankind?

And cow farts? Seriously? I thought it was our carbon footprint that we were supposed to be reducing, not our methane footprint.

Everything that I have said to you (not the image) was all the info from school. Do you really think school would teach you biased info? They dont teach us about what religion is the accurate one. So why would they teach us false info?

When the government starts pushing an agenda the first place they go is the schools. It didn't used to be that way. Long before I was born schools used to teach you how to think and not what to think. Schools are just left wing indoctrination camps that also throw in little math, English and biology.

Climate change IS a religion to the true believers!

Of course schools teach biased information. Schools are an extension of governments ($) but the teacher's unions really call the shots through their political power.

And methane adds to greenhouse gases that heat up the earth

Is nitrogen a greenhouse gas? How about oxygen? Just asking because 80% of our air is nitrogen. 18% is oxygen and the remaining 2% is all of the other gases. Of that 2% CO2 makes up about 2%.

So what the climate prognosticators are saying is that 2% of 2% of all of the gases that make up our atmosphere is going to cause the planet to fry if it increased just slightly.

Oh BTW.. When I said schools used to teach you how to think what I was saying is that if you came up with an idea then you had to defend it to the teachers. If you put up a good argument for your position that would determine your grade. It did not matter at all of your position disagreed with the teacher. The majority of High School graduates today could not pass any tests needed to graduate the 6th grade 100 years ago. I would think that a lot of college graduates couldn't pass that 6th grade test. All because no one is taught how to think any more.

If you disagree with a teacher now your grade goes down.

Could you narrow down the second paragraph I have trouble processing things

And you exhale CO2, so in the name of saving the earth please stop immediately.

There was no "reply" link on your last comment so I have to reply here.

"Could you narrow down the second paragraph I have trouble processing things"

It was probably my fault. Sometimes I don't word things very well.

What I was trying to say that 98% of the atmosphere is nitrogen and oxygen. The other 2% of the atmosphere are all of the other gases, like helium, methane and carbon dioxide (CO2), etc. In that 2% of all other gases, CO2 accounts for only 2%. It's a very small amount of gas. That's what I meant by 2% of 2%.

So when scientists are saying CO2 is causing global warming it doesn't make sense. There is not much CO2 compared to all of the other gases.

If scientists said nitrogen causes global warming then that would make more sense because of the amount of nitrogen in the atmosphere. Most of our atmosphere is nitrogen.

I hope I explained that well enough this time. If you're still not understanding just let me know and I try to explain it again. I know.... I'll make a meme. 😁

i agree

Climate change is man made. All that greenhouse gas you use for profit is warming up the world and melting ice caps, therefore making the sea rise and polar bears endangered. And if you want to be a girl but are a dude, there’s nothing wrong with that. But gender is not a feeling.

Climate change IS manmade, not all leftists support killing the unborn, such as me, I don't. And Men and Women can change genders through surgery.

No, they can change their privates. Their biological gender stays the same.

:0)

but what's the tradeoffs? God loves us all, he specifically says that.

Who said anything about not loving them?