Victims of Leftist Terrorism: Vince Foster

Rumor/conspiracy theory had it that Hillary was screwing Vince while Bill was screwing whoever happened to be handy at the moment. . .and Bill didn't like it when Hillary did what he did on a regular basis.

That was a suicide

Sure it was. SMH

I mean, y'all have had 30 years to prove even a scratch of any of it.

Failing to prove things is a bit of a recurring theme this year.

Kinda like the last 4 years with you lot and your fake impeachments, fables of collusion, etc. SMH

I'm not explaining to you the difference between the number 30 and the number 4.

https://www.wnd.com/2016/02/vince-foster-suicide-shocker-2nd-wound-documented/

Oh hey, it's the guy who's quite literally always wrong. How's your research into criminal law in California going?

Nice of you to announce yourself like that.

Just replied to you on that very subject on a separate thread in fact, article about the stores shutting down.

You should connect yourself with common sense and reality more often.

Plus I see you dodged the real story in the link.

True to form again. But facts are stubborn things.

How would you know what facts are?

Yeah, the thread in which you claimed police are powerless to deal with shoplifting is now about store closures.

Because you can't face the fact that your original claim is wrong.

Because your claims are always wrong. I've been telling you this for years. You have a very poor handle on what is true and what isn't. It doesn't surprise me that you still but into the Vince Foster thing 30 go***mn years after Republicans themselves admitted they had nothing to show for it.

They're subject to the same libel laws as anyone else, and honestly these days, they're less ridiculous than a DS corporatocracy-controlled pawn like CNN. And I had multiple direct experience in and family ties to MSM news entities. So kindly don't ask me to take seriously the conventional tinfoil dismissals.

If you're interested in truth, the identity of the source is less important than the plausibility of the claim.

So yeah. Really.