Don't we all breath the same air?

Air pollution is rascist and so is math? I thought the world was the world, not the buzzfeed

Sweet Universe....that is so FUC@ING retarded! The study no doubt was done by White liberals with a token person of colour who is transgender....to no doubt add some diversity, race, gender, and equality....ummm! equity!

So poor people are exposed more to pollution, is also absurd?************
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm
*sarcasm

Different parts of the population can be concentrated in different areas.

If they don't like it then they should move.

I member that line from Oblongs. Moving costs money that people might not have. If you look, I'm sure that poverty will correlate better than race.

If you want to badly enough, anyone CAN move. We've got people coming over the border with nothing more than the shirt on their back.

It's not my study and not my circus. I live and work in the suburbs because I'm privileged.

Damn you hill people, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei3WRn_P4Vo

LOL, Good one!

In fairness not all of them can.

Libs have gone batshit on things like race, but they are not wrong that entities that pollute gravitate to cheap areas where minorities may concentrate, and the latter may be adversely affected as a result.

The solution would be competent enforcement of the regs instead of letting people walk without account for their adverse impacts on public health.

I don't even know where to begin, I'm not fully caffenated yet, only had one cup o' coffee.

I would say, to your first statement, look at the situation on the border. If you want to badly enough, anyone CAN move. We've got people coming over the border with nothing more than the shirt on their back.

Governments will always bow to businesses needs rather than slum dwellers, so there goes any hope of competent enforcement of the regs. (I'm assuming that you're referring to environmental and anti-pollution regs?)