In Today's News

Which Trump and his henchmen did not do the first time.

Do some research. The state legislatures investigations found mountains of fraud and even tried to recertify their electors for Trump.
There are videos showing the fraud.
When someone says no evidence. Most people think they are insane.

You just keep repeating that same line, over and over. You're just another broken record on the right. Please come back to reality.

You know how you know there's fraud? Because nobody wants an investigation into the process. Everyone reads the same talking points: "but they recounted, 3 times in some places and the results were the same" but it's disingenuous because they never addressed the issues of ballot harvesting. Meanwhile, people keep getting arrested, quietly for ballot harvesting. The media won't touch it. The courts won't (historically won't) touch it and the Dems have been able to create this frightening narrative that if you challenge the results - you're a racist. It's actually brilliant when you really take a moment to step back and look at how it was done.

The real problem so many on the left are not understanding is over 70 million people are positive this election was stolen and that's not going to go away. Sure, many may be afraid to speak up right now because big tech and corporations are threatening people's livelihoods (again, if there was nothing to fear) for siding with Trump. The biggest issue I have is that math does not support a Biden win.

FActs

So by your logic, "nobody wants to investigate" = "voter fraud happened". Sorry buttercup, that's a spurious leap of logic if I've ever seen one.

Ballot harvesting, i.e. having a third party turn in a mail-in ballot, is not an issue. Many states allow this (with some constraints), and there has been no evidence that it contributes to voter fraud. Fun fact: Donald Trump himself had a third party turn in his ballot in Florida. Yet nobody in the pro-fraud crowd has raised concerns about voter fraud in Florida. Why is that? Oh yeah, because Trump won that state! So I guess there's only voter fraud in a swing state if Biden wins it.

70 million people could believe the Earth was flat, and that wouldn't make it any more true. The problem so many on the right are not understanding is that more than 70 million, on both sides, are confident the election was fair and honest, and that's not going away. There hasn't been any evidence to back up any claims of widespread voter fraud in this election.

The math doesn't support a Biden win? What math is that, the one that says the odds of him winning are one in a quadrillion? Yeah, that math doesn't stand up to scrutiny, and that was proven very early on. Or perhaps you're referring to the 100%+ voter turnout? Doesn't exist anywhere in any state election records.

One question I keep asking and the pro-fraud crowd never seems to have an answer: if the Democrats (or whoever you imagine is in on this imaginary, made up voter fraud conspiracy) were capable and/or willing to commit widespread voter fraud, why would they only rig the presidential election? Why would they give so many House seats to the Republicans, and force the Senate into such a close tie that the two Democrat senatorial candidates from Georgia would have to win?

I would spend some time breaking it all down but you haven't done the research. All your talking points are directly from the MSM left...you can't change a mind that's made up.

I have done the research, and your reluctance to "break it all down" only proves my point, as does your inability to counter any of my points. All *your* talking points are recycled crap from right-wing fringe media or other people on the right that are on imgflip. And once again that same old tired "fake news" refrain I hear over and over from the pro-fraud crowd. How do you even know what media I used?

I applaud your patience and persistence on addressing these.
I sure don't have it.

Thanks. It hasn't been easy, and to be honest I'm not sure if I've changed anyone's mind. The pro-fraud crowd of imgflip are a stubborn lot. Sadly, admitting the truth after being fooled can be embarrassing, and I think many would prefer to hold on to the false narrative. Same thing with the Qanon crowd.

I hate to say this, but it's a psychological fact that people generally aren't swayed by arguments contrary to their positions no matter how irrefutable, convincing, and well presented the evidence.

This particular crowd isn't exactly conducive to making any exceptions to that. Politics have filled the niche once occupied by religion in most our lives, and this is mentality of the most extreme cultish nature. Some may say it's biased to say, but you can see them deliberately lying and trying to validate such by simple repetition while accusung others of what they do to the point that it's way past mere projection and simply confessional.

That's why I don't usually bother, preferring to make a joke of it, highlighting the absurdity of what they say. Hardly the most applaudable approach, but at least I get a laugh out of it rather than frustrated.

I'm telling you this - if you did the research, bypassing any news media - left or right, you would have come to a different conclusion. Just because you haven't seen the proof, doesn't mean it does not exist...

You know, when I stopped paying attention to the news and started digging for video and content that wasn't broken down as editorial content, a weight was lifted. So I don't know what to tell you. You believe what you believe. I know 1000% there was voter fraud. It's going to come out.

I bet you think the Russian collusion was real...even though that's all starting to unravel.

You sound very much like someone who's been brainwashed.

your conditioning is complete.

You're very far down the rabbit hole. I don't know if you'll ever escape your delusions.

Since when do I give any f**ks about what happened on Wall Street?

your paradox...I bet you think there was nothing to see on Wallstreet either.

That's what brainwashed people always say...

That's what brainwashed people always say.

Here's some research you've probably never seen (it wasn't shown on CNN).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=16708&v=u5ZP_HpBKos&feature=youtu.be

I actually have seen that research, and I found it unimpressive. And it's been thoroughly debunked here: https://nickdepsky.medium.com/the-data-integrity-group-and-its-claims-of-election-fraud-debunked-c8307867667c

You can't 'debunk' video evidence and negative numbers. Please. Just look at the evidence and do your own research.

And yet that's just what happened, because reality doesn't care what voter fraud lies you think can't be debunked.

You're hopeless. I bet you didn't even read the article I posted.

Further conversation with you is a waste of time.

So basically you just highlighted only the parts of the article that agreed with your voter fraud narrative, made up your mind that any and all errors or irregularities are evidence of voter fraud, and completely skimmed over the parts that discredted that narrative.

Again, you're hopeless. Please stop embarrassing yourself further with this voter fraud nonsense.

"And yet that's just what happened, because reality doesn't care what voter fraud lies you think can't be debunked."
Nope. Fake news. Some counties at certain times showed negative numbers for Trump. You can never have a negative vote count in an honest election. QED: There was fraud in the election.

Looking over your video:
I skipped the part about 'credibility of the research group' as that's just an appeal to authority. You verify the facts not the source.
An interesting quote:
"Vote Pattern Irregularities (decrements and switching) in PA and GA
Since I was able to obtain the actual county-level datasets of running vote totals in Pennsylvania (PA) and Georgia (GA) that the group put together, I recreated the analysis they share in the videos and then conducted a more comprehensive assessment of vote tallies for both Trump and Biden in the two states. To validate their data, I cross-checked the final counts in their tables with publicly available vote totals (GA Sec. of State, NYT) in multiple counties to make sure things lined up, which they did, leading me to believe the data they compiled are likely to be (fairly) accurate."

Another quote that indicates they had an 'error' (i.e. were hacked):
"The upper graph shows the same absentee vote counts (as lines) seen in the videos’ bar charts, while the bottom shows the time-series of in-person votes. We can see that there were, in fact, strange spikes at roughly the same time for in-person votes as the absentee spike, suggesting a system-wide error at that point for both candidates’ vote types. Biden’s spike and subsequent “deletion” of in-person votes is much greater than Trump’s, but this is not mentioned in the video."

skimming through the rest of the article it appears that the author agrees there were all kinds of issues and irregularities, but they claim that they were in Trumps favor not Biden's.

Either way QED: voter fraud proved.