Yup

Ya Damn skippy

Stop being Anti-American.

Stop hating America.

So you gloat when you win,
and take vengeance when you lose?

Small man.

Small.

so you are calling us anti americans by doing stuff that you guys did, hypocritical much

So what you're doing - is it American or not?

I say it's more american than what you guys are doing, sore losers are common (democrats and republicans) but sore winners are much less common (democrats). raiding the capitol is better than burning down homes and businesses

Do I need to google search 2016 election memes where the Republicans were the sore winners, too?

We never had a chance to be, it was russia russia russia from hour 6 of day one, you people were sore losers because it was Hillary's turn, it was just her turn she'd waited for her turn in line and he "stole it from her" even though he didnt so she made up the russia collusion excrement to cover for her piss por campaigning, meanwhile we and he were in defense the whole time and nowhere near "gloat", check your revisionist history, man.

Is it our fault that the President implicated himself on Title 52 Section 30121 Paragraph 2a saying "Russia, if you're listening, find those emails?"

Leftists have no sense of humor, therefore they dont understand jokes.

You don't joke about breaking the law. They might be listening. They might act on said joke. Which, according to the FBI, they did.

So, if Biden starts saying stupid shit, I can claim the joke defense too? (This is a rhetorical question, you're setting a bad precedent as you're using revisionist history to claim he was joking after the fact when he didn't clarify.) When Trump said this, he was holding a political rally, not a stand-up show. Given the setting and the purpose of the venue, he is assumed to be taken seriously.

This "just joking" defense is actually the lack of a defense.

Try again.

https://www.newstatesman.com/2019/06/when-someone-just-joking

https://sage.thesharps.us/2016/08/10/i-was-only-joking/

https://www.shellypjohnson.com/why-the-phrase-i-was-only-joking-is-usually-an-excuse-for-bad-behavior-that-roseanne-barr-tweet-and-some-other-stuff/

If Biden starts saying stupid shit it'll be excused by the "news" first, then congressional leaders, then the rank and file lockstep democrat voter, then whoever else has to be forced to agree with everyone else who's agreed so far under threat of mob violence from antifa if they dont.

This isn't about what Trump or Biden said. This is about what you, collectively as a party, said to the Democrats when they wanted to resist. You criticized them. You called them anti-American.

You now repeat the same actions of the Democrats, the actions that you so vehemently decried and pointed the finger at, virtue signaling your patriotism.

Were you wrong to call out the Democrats? Thereby declaring that you were gaslighting them all along?
Or were you justified? Thereby making you a hypocrite?

Whichever you pick, I'll support you.

Is lying about a deadly virus funny? How about this, is this funny too?

Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44852812

How about this, a real hoot huh?

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/341062-russian-official-trump-and-putin-agreed-to-team-up-on-cybersecurity

The "news" lies about the "virus" every single day, it's less deadly than the common cold, sycophant much?

Yes it was "Russia if you are listening, I hope you can hack our computers and find those emails, you will be greatly rewarded"...... and for damn good reason.

So this isn't "gloating?"

You may not have gloated, but the majority of Trump supporters did.

did we want the president to leave before inauguration after we already won the election, that's being a sore winner, what we did was brag, different things, or at least different degrees

So, different degrees is a valid argument?

our degree, if it is in that category, is barely even considered being a sore winner

Maybe you weren't a sore winner, but the vast majority of Trump supporters in 2016 were.

So, being a hypocrite means this:
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

So, you're mad about how we reacted. And you're going to do the same thing out of spite? That's hypocrisy man. You're welcome to resist all you want, that's your right and I'm not stopping you. My initial reply:

"Stop being Anti-American.

Stop hating America.

So you gloat when you win,
and take vengeance when you lose?

Small man.

Small."

Points this out. It points out that these phrases and buzzwords like "Anti-American" and "Hating America" were the very phrases you [Trump Supporters] used on the left. I'm holding you to your own standard. Personally, I could care less what you do. But if you blush when you're held to your own standard, that's not my problem.

Maybe you should either own it and say that you were wrong to criticize us for our resistance and continue your resistance.
Or, continue your resistance and accept the criticism of being called a hypocrite. I don't care if you resist or not.

What'll it be?
Were you wrong?
Or are you a hypocrite?

So, are different degrees a valid argument?

None was made ever, and it still remains that way now. If you are talking about the process starting, then I will be glad to inform you that trump was the one being impeached, learn what things are before you say them

Trump was impeached twice. Once in 2018, and now in 2021.
Definition of impeach: (especially in the US) charge (the holder of a public office) with misconduct.
The word you're thinking of is conviction: "a formal declaration that someone is guilty of a criminal offense, made by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge in a court of law."
Trump has never been convicted.

So let's get back to the conversation:

"did we want the president to leave before inauguration after we already won the election, that's being a sore winner, what we did was brag, different things, or at least different degrees"

You did exactly this.

Depends on the argument

Obviously, I am talking about the one you made.

We impeached the president after we won? Nope, that's you you did exactly that. Stop blaming us for what you guys did

? No impeachment was made until 2018...

If it hardly is considered something and it is compared to something that is definitely, 100 percent, that thing, then the first thing is nothing

"did we want the president to leave before inauguration after we already won the election, that's being a sore winner, what we did was brag, different things, or at least different degrees"

You did exactly this.

NO ITS NOT "BETTER and no one is burning homes and businesses.... stfu and stop comparing the two

its not even CLOSE .... you attacked THE CAPITOL... YOU KILLED COPS.... YOU MEANT TO KILL CONGRESS PEOPLE ... YOU TRIED TO OVERTURN AN ELECTION.... STFU... STOP COMPARING... THERE IS NO COMPARASION to OUTRIGHT TREASON

Seditious Conspiracy and Federal Law: The Basics
The federal law against seditious conspiracy can be found in Title 18 of the U.S. Code (which includes treason, rebellion, and similar offenses), specifically 18 U.S.C. § 2384. According to the statutory definition of sedition, it is a crime for two or more people within the jurisdiction of the United States:

To conspire to overthrow or destroy by force the government of the United States or to level war against them;
To oppose by force the authority of the United States government; to prevent, hinder, or delay by force the execution of any law of the United States; or
To take, seize, or possess by force any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof.

its not even CLOSE .... you attacked THE CAPITOL... YOU KILLED COPS.... YOU MEANT TO KILL CONGRESS PEOPLE ... YOU TRIED TO OVERTURN AN ELECTION.... STFU... STOP COMPARING... THERE IS NO COMPARASION to OUTRIGHT TREASON

Seditious Conspiracy and Federal Law: The Basics
The federal law against seditious conspiracy can be found in Title 18 of the U.S. Code (which includes treason, rebellion, and similar offenses), specifically 18 U.S.C. § 2384. According to the statutory definition of sedition, it is a crime for two or more people within the jurisdiction of the United States:

To conspire to overthrow or destroy by force the government of the United States or to level war against them;
To oppose by force the authority of the United States government; to prevent, hinder, or delay by force the execution of any law of the United States; or
To take, seize, or possess by force any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof.

Were you looking in the mirror when you wrote that? No one does smug like leftists who think they've gotten away with theft, and how exactly is this meme "taking vengeance" when we lose? Isnt that what antifa did every time they crawled out of thier moms basements for the last 4 years? Try again lefty.

Nah, I was looking at the forums two months ago, mimicking what the right-wing was saying.

Fact of the matter is, both sides are f**ked up. I'm putting my feelers if the right-wing is bigger than the left by owning up and admitting fault. But rather than say "Yeah, we f**ked up." They displace blame and point the finger of hypocrisy right back at the accuser. Simply because it is easier to place blame on someone else.

Which you have done in flying colors today. I hate being right in this case.

So resistance, is it anti-american or is it american?

How am I a hypocrite?

See! Typical Trump supporter! Can't provide evidence! Just like they can't provide evidence for their voter fraud!
It's all smoke and mirrors to deflect from the argument!
You haven't proven anything.
Am I a democrat politician? No.
Did I call for violence? No.
You're throwing spaghetti at a wall to displace and deflect blame.

So, when you criticize the Democrats for Resisting, were you wrong to do so?
Or, were you justified in your criticism, only to do it now, thus making you a hypocrite?

Own it.

It's one or the other.

Where do you stand?

So, was it wrong to point the finger at Democrats for resisting? Thus, stating that you were gaslighting them for being anti-American?

Or were you justified in your finger pointing at the Democrats and their #resist movement? Thereby making you the hypocrite for wanting to repeat the narrative for which you so quickly pointed the finger?

No, I'm just not buying Trump Supporter Red-Herrings anymore. Stay on topic. Quit trying to move goal posts and throw red herrings. Answer the question, then we can move on to another topic.

Not really. Consensus on the left is that the Right-wing has gotta just own up to the fact that they lost the election fair and square. Man up and own it.

Much like the right said about the left in 2016, but that fell on deaf ears as the looting and burning commenced.

Two separate issues. Your issue was that FBI actually found proof that Russia interfered.

No government branch has found substantial proof that the Left rigged the election.

Regardless, I sucked it up and realized that in spite of interference, we have to deal with his [Trump's] presidency in the legal channels, follow our traditions, follow the precedents of peaceful transfer of power.

Can't say the same that the right-wing even attempted it when they lost. Maybe some were willing to accept it...

But it's not like the left tried to kill members of Congress and overthrow the government.

There was never any proof of Russia collusionThe left burned cities and looted everything, but a few regards from the right caused some trouble too. Guess we all have our idiots..

FBI found proof of interference, not collusion.

If the DNC was wrong for the #resistance movement, then that makes this post Anti-American.
If they were validated for the #resistance movement, they weren't Anti-American after all. Instead what you were doing was anti-american; you were just gaslighting them into thinking they weren't - suppressing their ideals..

Which is it?

No, not at all. You're welcome to resist.

I just want to know what that makes you.
"We were wrong to criticize you for your movement, viva la resistance!" (You were gaslighting us.)
"It's wrong to criticize people for their resistance movement! Have a taste of your own medicine!" (Hypocrite)
"We told you it was wrong then. But now it's okay!" (hypocrite)

Being that I don't care whether or not you resist leaves me out of the hypocrisy as I am saying you're free to do what you wish, the same advice I would have given myself 5 years ago.

You guys set your own standards. You can't live by them.

That makes you hypocrites.

Fire with fire, wait for the peaceful protests coming soon.

How am I fighting fire with fire in this topic?

You aren’t you are the fire.

Better put me out with your tears. With how many flush out of those ducts, I could easily be drowned.

The left started the looting. Destruction and murder. You supported it and encouraged it. The traitors in the Democratic Party egged them on and helped get them out of jail to continue the destruction. Catharsis? The democratic part has gone through it but went from butterfly to 🐛.

When did I ever support this? Quit making stuff up, my man. Might wanna check your rabies at the door.

Yes my tears of laughter 😂

Laughter comes with catharsis, I get it. Once you see how foolish you really are when the left mimics your behavior, it is quite hilarious, isn't it? Now that you're on the other side of the fence, that is.

??? I never did these things.