It's worked with the definition of racism

I don't think BLM had a target. MAGA did.

They weren't aiming at the government.
MAGA did.

There was no uprising against the authority initially. There was with MAGA.

The authority responded to BLM.
The authority was already there at capitol hill.

Nuanced details but important, nonetheless.

"Dear Merriam-Webster This definition is not clear enough for the right to understand. They seem to think that this term does not apply to them if it doesn't apply to BLM. But if it does apply to them, then so should it apply to BLM. This does not seem like a genuine request as the letter addressed to you was written in satire from the right. Instead, it is a mere sad attempt at displacing blame while attempting to apply humor at the expense of perceived political opponents. Please revise these entries so that there is no ambiguity.

Thank you,

The People of the United States."

Portland’s federal courthouse.

While a valid argument, it is not the State Senate or State House of Representatives, nor the Seat of Power for the entire country being the Federal Senate and the Federal House of Representatives. Though granted, it is Federal Property.

BLM didn't have a target and isn't a group blah blah blah. Where do you think they protested? Burger King? That police station had nothing to do with authority. F the police that everyone was wearing had nothing to do with governance. I know you guys don't believe what you sell. Keep trying to pretend nuance exists between right wing extremists and left wing extremists. A lot of people will pretend with you. Thinking the election was rigged and protesting the results, while stupid, is just as protected as thinking cops are out to shoot unarmed black people for no reason. The resulting violence at both are not reflective of the group. Guilt by association is bad believe it or not. But it is you who is trying to have it both ways. The right is guilty, because it furthers my aims the left is not because it does not. That is your nuance in a nutshell.

BLM didn't have a target and isn't a group blah blah blah. Where do you think they protested? Burger King? That police station had nothing to do with authority. F the police that everyone was wearing had nothing to do with governance.
>> Only in response to their use of excessive force in protests.

I know you guys don't believe what you sell. Keep trying to pretend nuance exists between right wing
extremists and left wing extremists.
>> Keep pretending that it doesn't.

A lot of people will pretend with you. Thinking the election was rigged and protesting the results, while stupid, is just as protected as thinking cops are out to shoot unarmed black people for no reason.
>> The right to protest it is equally valid. Rioting is never permitted or legal. Though, I sympathize though more for those who are worried about human lives rather than those who are throwing a temper tantrum because they lost an election.

The resulting violence at both are not reflective of the group. Guilt by association is bad believe it or not.
>> I have cited the genetic fallacy multiple times.

But it is you who is trying to have it both ways. The right is guilty, because it furthers my aims the left is not because it does not. That is your nuance in a nutshell. Hmm.. Let's look some things up here...

terrorist: a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

political: relating to the government or the public affairs of a country.

social justice: justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society.

The right to not suffer excessive force at the hands of the police is not a privilege that you shouldn't have to advocate. It's not a political gain. it should be an inalienable right

Keep in mind it was Antifa and Qtards that were told by Q to break in. The other million people there did not do anything and tried to stop them.

Not even apple's and oranges. This is like comparing an apple to a chalkboard. Wrongful deaths vs losing.

SMH

You are looking at the reason to protest. Doesn't matter. Everyone has the right to protest whether it is valid or not.

When mobs start burning, looting and trespassing or when people target the police, that is insurrection and it happened all year not just at the Capitol. Both sides are either guilty or not guilty. I say the latter and would take it that the individuals should be tried and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law to make sure this doesn't happen again.

But instead of reason the left only sees opportunity and will use this as a tool to get their way and they will explain with the backing of all of the accepted media how this represents all people who disagree with the mainstream group think and any such separate thoughts should not have a platform or this much scarier thing will continue.

It is pure evil. The campaign against disinformation is a campaign against freedom of information and liberty itself.