MAGA militia has an agenda

That dudes an Antifa. All black face covered.

FBI say no.

FBI corrupt.

FBI is Law enforcement demonized by Trump.
That page is about to be turned.

No, FBI is law enforcement that lied about Russia collusion, changed Flynn's testimony and railroaded Roger stone on a technicality.
Everyone knows the FBI is corrupt.

I think you mean “everyone who isn’t suffering from TDS knows the FBI is corrupt”.

Just you, Trump, and MAGA.

Everyone knows Toejoe. We don't exclusively watch CNN like you do.

Alex Jones and pizzagate is not news lokiare

Alex Jones said pizzagate was fake from the start. Once again you lie.

Alex Jones went to trial because someone was shot and killed.
That’s when he disavowed his claims

With a user name such as “COLONEL” you know the difference.
Stop embarrassing yourself.

If these guys were BLM? Would you still be taking this as a joke? Colonel?

I enjoy the humor, but we both know they would have never gotten that close.

It’s not about Portland or BLM.
It’s about MAGA and The Dc riots.

I hope you don’t generalize and post that it couldn’t be BLM because they didn’t burn the building down.

Then why did you bring up BLM?

https://imgflip.com/i/4t6635
https://imgflip.com/i/4t686u
https://imgflip.com/i/4t66hj
https://imgflip.com/i/4t6635

Meanwhile, BLM rioters go free.

Hypocrite ToeJoe

A Capital insurrection instigated by an unstable President.
5 dead including an Officer?
This is Domestic Terrorism!

The president did not advocate this. Stop twisting tweets to fit your narrative.
And I never said it wasn’t domestic terrorism. I said that these people are being treated differently than other domestic terrorists.

Is your brain pickled in orange KoolAid?
Why is the Presidents Twitter feed disabled?
The President did advocate this!
Sorry, twisted truth is the MAGAT way. You’re exposed.

No one now believes the MAGA agenda isn’t what it is, Domestic Terrorism
This is the beginning. We’re preparing to defend the Constitution and our Country. In a lawful and Patriotic manner.

There’s more to come from the Traitorous MAGA, but we must remain steadfast in defense of their unfounded insurrection.

You have no proof that he incited a riot. You think that just because he was banned from Twitter mean he advocated it.

I can name tweets he made actually RESISTING the storm.

Get your facts straight,

That's still not Trump.

Exactly lol

“Why is the Presidents Twitter feed disabled?”
Because Twitter is practicing censorship

“The President did advocate this!”
Just like Pelosi, Schumer, Biden, and other Democrat politicians advocated the months of riots last summer.

“Sorry, twisted truth is the MAGAT way.”
Then you must be a MAGAT

Censorship? Yes, Trump was censored for inciting a riot. You defend that? We all see what side of the law you’re on.

MAGA attacks Linsey Graham at Airport.
Amazing how fast MAGAT devours their own.

You lost all 3 branches of Government. Why? Can safely summarize, wasn’t because of Pelosi or Schumer! Ha ha!

Do everyone on the flip a favor, stop peddling your MAGA lies here.

If Trump incited a riot, then all the democrats who incited and encouraged the BLM riots for months on end should be censored too.

“You lost all 3 branches of Government. Why?”
That’s what the protesting outside the Capitol building was all about. They believe it was due to election fraud. Try to keep up.

Do us all a favor and post your leftist propaganda in politicsToo where you don’t have to defend your brainwashed opinions.

Total Projection.The President incited and facilitated a violent assault on Congress that resulted in 5 deaths. Including a capital hill police officer. Trump must face legal consequences for his actions.
Insurrectionists like the ones pictured above AND a West Virginia Republican delegate who stupidly recorded and posted his illegal activities on Facebook will all be arrested.
You support lawless criminals? That’s your business.
I , and millions like myself, believe in continuing the rule of law, and protecting our Country and Democracy, against all future insurrections committed by MAGATS.

I hope every singe one of the idiots who broke into the capital get arrested and prosecuted. There was no justification for it.

Let’s face it, Trump is a total jerk. He arrogant, childish, a liar (like all politicians) and totally classless. But, contrary to what the media and Democrats say, he didn’t incite the violence at the Capitol. If you believe Trump encouraged those idiots to do what they did then you have to also believe that the Democrat politicians who supported the BLM protests encouraged them to burn buildings, shoot and throw rocks at cops, loot businesses, take over a police precinct a city center, etc.

How quickly the media forgets the atrocious events of last summer and call the capital incident the worst thing to happen to our country in recent history. I also hope every single thug who broke laws during the BLM riots and protests get arrested and prosecuted too. But I don’t hear much from the left about that. They are too busy jumping on a single violent incident by Trump supporters . . . Because they don’t have many to choose from.

The incident at the Capitol lasted a few hours. The BLM riots lasted a few months. A little perspective, please. It’s total hypocrisy.

You mean like how Republican Lawmakers were endorsing the riot that took place?

Republican lawmakers endorsed the riot just as much as Democrat lawmakers did.

Proof to your claim?

I’m just being sarcastic, saying no lawmakers from either party did.

You’re the one who claims Republican lawmakers endorsed the riot. Let’s see your proof.

"I’m just being sarcastic, saying no lawmakers from either party did.

You’re the one who claims Republican lawmakers endorsed the riot. Let’s see your proof."
These three for starters...

This rhetoric in the week leading up to it:
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/01/06/capitol-storm-texas-republicans-congress/

Trump's Tweet Justifying the behavior:
https://projects.propublica.org/politwoops/tweet/1346954970910707712

This guy telling people to hold lawmakers accountable, stand and fight, don't let our democracy die:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKHwV6sdrMk
(There is video footage of them doing just that "HANG MIKE PENCE!" chants were at the front door)

The Giuliani claiming that he and the President would stake their reputations that if their (lawmakers) officers were searched, criminality would be found. Also calling for trial by combat:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvO3OHjdyYY

Imagine, being in a position of strong influence not understanding the effect your words have on people. You may not intend something, but that's not how people take it. That's what Democrats have been warning you about for four years. Now? MAGAts have acted on something that they thought they understood. So even if Giuliani was speaking rhetorically, that's not how the message was received. Those people acted on the rhetoric used.

We warned you.

Same thing can be said of all the Democrat politicians who endorsed those who rioted for several months last summer. Don’t be a hypocrite.

"Same thing can be said of all the Democrat politicians who endorsed those who rioted for several months last summer. Don’t be a hypocrite."
Were you even paying attention last year?
There was no politician that stirred up people for what happened to George Floyd. That happened all on its own.
Trump stirred the pot. Trump got them riled up. Roaring, angry cheers of "Yeah!" It's like I was watching an angry mob movie from the 1960s. There was Trump, stoking the crowd, riling them up, cheering in anger when he kept calling out politicians. "Follow me, lets go give them a piece of our minds!" He didn't say to go peaceably. He didn't say to go violently. He left it open to interpretation. That's the danger.

Dude, you're so brainwashed and blind to this shit it's unsettling.
I'm telling you. Just go watch any movie about social unrest in the 60s. Hell, go watch the Netflix Movie "The Chicago 7." Then, go watch Trump's entire rally before that riot.

Trump started that f**king riot dude. He may not have been the spark, but he poured the fuel, set the accelerant, and let the people do the rest. Just one person to think this was a good idea is all it would take, and the rest would catch like wildfire.

Then, speaking to the entire group he said he loved them and that they were special. I did watch the whole vid. I had to watch it twice because I couldn't be sure if he excluded the violent ones from those statements. He didn't.

It's not censorship if you agreed to the terms of using their service, which Trump did, then violated on multiple occassions.

It is when they claim section 230 protections and label themselves a 'platform' which requires them to not censor.

Section 230 of what?
Twitter Terms of Use:
"1. Who May Use the Services
You may use the Services only if you agree to form a binding contract with Twitter and are not a person barred from receiving services under the laws of the applicable jurisdiction....

3. Content on the Services
You are responsible for your use of the Services and for any Content you provide, including compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations. You should only provide Content that you are comfortable sharing with others... [This means that you can be held accountable if you retweet something that does not meet the aforementioned conditions.]

... We reserve the right to remove Content that violates the User Agreement, including for example, copyright or trademark violations or other intellectual property misappropriation, impersonation, unlawful conduct, or harassment."

The Twitter Rules:

"Safety
Violence: You may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people. We also prohibit the glorification of violence. Learn more about our violent threat and glorification of violence policies.

Terrorism/violent extremism: You may not threaten or promote terrorism or violent extremism. Learn more....

... Civic Integrity: You may not use Twitter’s services for the purpose of manipulating or interfering in elections or other civic processes. This includes posting or sharing content that may suppress participation or mislead people about when, where, or how to participate in a civic process. Learn more....

... Synthetic and manipulated media: You may not deceptively share synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to cause harm. In addition, we may label Tweets containing synthetic and manipulated media to help people understand their authenticity and to provide additional context. Learn more...."

Trump violated these rules on numerous occassions. By violating the agreeent, he forfeited his privilege to use their intellectual property; for which, they can terminate his account on an at-will basis due to the agreement that he violated.

Yes he did, he encouraged his followers at a rally to march to the capitol after Rudy said that Reps and Senators should essentially be chosen by trial by combat. Trump also retweeted tweets that spoke of storming the capitol.

Source?

What News outlets do you prefer?

Let’s see you site one that actually shows some of the retweets from Trump and we’ll go from there.

The request was of the claim: Rudy said that Reps and Senators should essentially be chosen by trial by combat. Trump also retweeted tweets that spoke of storming the capitol.

Trump Endorsing those who marched and rioted - "We love you go home in peace, you're special." (Even if he is addressing those who didn't partake in the violence, he is making a distinction, which he didn't.) Then tweeting "This is what happens when a sacred landslide election is so unceremoniously viciously stripped away..." Offering them a justification.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8PHImxb8Po
https://projects.propublica.org/politwoops/tweet/1346954970910707712

Trump putting all of the protesters and rioters into one box as "Thugs" offering no such distinction or terms of endearment to those who participated in a non-violent capacity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpEz48TJz2A

Rudy, calling for trial by combat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpSO2qRVysg

"Taking down names and kicking ass."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKHwV6sdrMk
Pence refused what Trump requested. His name was taken, and the Trump Zealots chose to seek his summary execution by hanging. Chanting "Hang Mike Pence!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8PHImxb8Po
Did you even listen to it? He said to ALL of them “we have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to have respect for our great people in law and order. We don’t want to have anyone hurt.”
Hardly inciting violence or justifying the idiots who broke into the Capitol.

https://projects.propublica.org/politwoops/tweet/1346954970910707712
Once again telling them to go home in peace.

As for your other situations, they weren’t even Trump talking. So, nice try.

Unlike the BLM rioters that Democrat politicians supported, the Trump supporters actually did go home and there has been peace at the Capitol. Can’t say that about the BLM protestors who attacked cops, set fires, tried to break into the White House grounds while disobeying curfew for several nights in a row last summer. So, why aren’t Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and all the other democrats who supported them being accused of inciting violence? If Trump is guilty of causing a riot then so are they. In fact they are worse because they continued to support them for months during riots that happened in cities all across the country. Let’s keep things in perspective, shall we.

"When did he post this? It wasn’t before the Capitol riot, so it wasn’t what incited it.
Again, he told them to go home. And, unlike the BLM rioters, they actually did."

He posted it around 6:15pm on 1/6/21. This was posted after the riot. I never said that this post depicts him inciting it. He's giving it justification.

Donald Trump told people to go home in the early afternoon. And, they didn't go home, they stayed after curfew.

"By late Wednesday evening, D.C. police had arrested 52 people —

47 of those arrests were related to curfew violations

and unlawful entry, and half of the total arrests occurred on U.S. Capitol grounds, according to Contee. He said that police began enforcing the curfew order at the Capitol and then fanned out to other parts of the city, and would continue to enforce it until it ended at 6 a.m."
https://wamu.org/story/21/01/06/dc-trump-election-protest/

Get out of here with your hyper-partisanship and rose colored glasses kthxbai

Toejoe: “A Capital insurrection instigated by an unstable President.”
TheBigPig: “The president did not advocate this”
You: “Yes he did ...”
Maybe he justified it but then so did all the Democrat politicians to justified 7 months on nationwide rioting because of George Floyd.

You’re milking this for more than it’s worth . . . because there are so few protests by non-leftists that turned violent. What’s the matter, are you afraid it won’t measure up to the BLM protests that Joe Biden and his ilk advocated?

"Toejoe: “A Capital insurrection instigated by an unstable President.”
TheBigPig: “The president did not advocate this”
You: “Yes he did ...”
Maybe he justified it but then so did all the Democrat politicians to justified 7 months on nationwide rioting because of George Floyd.

You’re milking this for more than it’s worth . . . because there are so few protests by non-leftists that turned violent. What’s the matter, are you afraid it won’t measure up to the BLM protests that Joe Biden and his ilk advocated?"

Comparing Riots to Riot...

“Comparing Riots to Riot”
Exactly. Hardly what the media has hyped it up to be.

"“Comparing Riots to Riot”
Exactly. Hardly what the media has hyped it up to be."

False. The comparison being made is that out of all riots, none of them involved the storming of the capitol.

... Yet, this is your first move out of the gate.

That's the alarm.

“The comparison being made is that out of all riots, none of them involved the storming of the capitol.”
Your right, they involved damaging more than 150 federal buildings including several DC monuments and attempts to storm the White House. They also torched and looted businesses.

Your totally ignoring how Democrats and the press gave a pass to the BLM riots that lasted for months while piling on a single incident that lasted for hours. I guess it’s because there are so few of them to choose from.

Explain this.

When did he post this? It wasn’t before the Capitol riot, so it wasn’t what incited it.
Again, he told them to go home. And, unlike the BLM rioters, they actually did.

TheBigPig - you have chosen your account name perfectly!

That’s... what I do. Take names.