Prove me wrong

"Influence the policey of a government by intimidation or coercion; or affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction."

Russian shill.

Me or him?

Ooops, I could have been more precise...
Yeah, lokiare.

K got it.

Cool

Who, lokiare?

Yes.

Yeah. I've known that.

Flagged for personal attack.

Good luck with that.

"Intimidated by a few people" is a COLOSSAL understatement. And no, just because the people elect your representatives, doesn't mean they can barge into the capitol, wreck and vandalize the entire place, threaten the lives of congressmen and women, place bombs inside the place, and kill police officers (blue lives matter amirite?) just because you got the results of a democratic election hurt your fee-fees. What an astonishingly stupid take. By your same logic, the Portland Riots at the federal courthouse were 100% justified.

Also, imagine flagging me over the most generic, un-profane, and nicest insult I could possibly levy at you lmao.

I've never seen a more egregious case of historical revisionism.

Your "sources" are BS.

1. There's no evidence of antifa storming the capitol. That has already been debunked.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2021/01/08/fbi-no-evidence-antifa-involved-in-capitol-chaos/?sh=34a34c9e6379

2. There were two bombs placed near the Capitol as well as molotov cocktails

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/dc/washington-dc-pipe-bombs-and-cooler-of-molotov-cocktails/65-d3fe68e9-0b79-4882-95ed-070da6abf2ee

3. They weren't just there to vandalize, and steal shit the place, however egregious that already was. If you see the videos of the seditionists banging on the door and the video taken before the qanon woman's death (THERE WERE LITERAL GUNFIGHTS BUT NOTHING HAPPENED AMIRITE), they weren't your mere trespassers. They were planning to overthrow the government and threaten the lives of our elected representatives. Don't be f**king stupid.

4. 5 PEOPLED DIED!!! 5 PEOPLE DIED!!! A F**KING POLICE OFFICER DIED!!!! And according to you, "literally nothing happened." Gtfoh

Please provide proof that ANTIFA DID storm the capitol.

Burden of proof is -always- on the claimant.

"I don't see the woman that was shot assaulting any officers. Where's your picture of that?"

I don't see any evidence that shows ANTIFA entered the building. Where's your evidence of that?"

1) It wasn't sun shining that day.
2) This image doesn't have a timestamp
3) The image on the right is too narrow to tell what is happening. I see cameras and a hallway with people in it, I don't see battering rams. For all I know he could be merely attending a hearing of some sort.

Do you have any images which can irrefutably place him there?

Really? Look around the guy in the 2nd picture. He's surrounded by MAGA.

I see one item that could be a MAGA hat. Cannot confirm, image quality too low. Need more evidence that I can confirm.

Cats and birds don't get mad that they lost a fair election.

2016 remember? or are you going to deny that as well

"Russia if you're listening, find those emails." Remember? Or are you going to deny that as well that this violates Title 52 Section 30121 Paragraph 2A.

On the otherhand, nice whataboutism.

so he asks russia to find 30,000 missing emails, and they say that he is committing voter fraud just because of that, the topics aren't even related

Where do you get that "he is comitting voter fraud?" No one said that.

you said that we get mad because we lost a "fair" election, you did the same

No we didn't. We did not claim that there was voter fraud, denied over 50 judges, denied multiple recounts, denied the ruling of the supreme court, denied the senate and the house of representatives.

No, instead HRC called Donald Trump to congratulate him.
Obama resumed the tradition of the transfer of power.

By comparison? We sucked it up and moved on instead of whining like little babies.

You guys said that Russia hacked into the voting machines and rigged it so trump would win

I never said that. I said Trump said on public television "Russia, if you're listening, find those emails." Violating Title 52 Section 30121 Paragraph 2A

oh, ok

More people peacefully walking in.

I don't see the woman that was shot assaulting any officers. Where's your picture of that?

She was assaulting the US Capitol. She was with a group trying to breach the hallway that led to Pence/Harris. There she is, censored on the floor. Only one person was shot that day.

She was entering a public building. Isn't it always the left that says you can't shoot trespassers?

Some of the left says that, sure. Yet, that's not what is happening here.
You have people here who were chanting their intent to publicly execute the Vice President.

That's exactly what's happening here. Technically the building is owned by the public (tax payers), so it wasn't even trespassing, the DC police ushered them in.

And under that statement, technically the tax payers pay for the nuclear weapons silos. Should we allow people in there, too?

Lokiare, you post a video that allegedly shows the police opening the gates for them. I had to google this claim. I found footage that (again) refutes your bullshit. If you want to view the video, this is the link https://twitter.com/PhilipinDC/status/1347028917685800961

here is a progression of the events: meme

Bonus points for tracking the timer.

Also, the capitol has been closed to the public since March 2020 due to COVID. It may belong to the public, but it isn't open to the Public. Much the same way that just because a library is closed to the public, and owned by it, does not give you the right to storm it.

Looks like some peaceful entering exchanges.

Fake news again. The constitution states you can't be deprived of life, without due process of law, meaning a judge and 12 jury have to find you guilty.
The woman was standing still and had no weapons. The cop was clearly wrong and murdered her.

She was assaulting the US Capitol. She was with a group trying to breach the hallway that led to Pence/Harris. There she is, censored on the floor. Only one person was shot that day.

Still debunks your:
"NoPe. If OuR gOvErNmEnT iS iNtImIdAtEd By A fEw PeOpLe PeAcEfUlLy EnTeRiNg ThE bUiLdInG (oF wHiCh We OwN) tHeN dO tHeY cLaSsIfY cAtS aNd BiRdS aS tErRoRiStS"?

Fake news again. You don't shoot people who are standing still and do not have weapons. That's against the law regardless of what she was doing.

Do you have proof that she was standing still doing nothing?

Yes, the video of the shooting. Please watch it from all angles.

Show me what you have?

https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/videos-show-shooting-of-ashli-babbitt-during-capitol-siege/

Lokiare, the link you sent me for of the woman being shot, shows she was trying to climb over the window and over the barricade from one hallway to another. There was nothing innocent in what she did.

Tell you what, tell a Londoner that all those bombs going off in their city throughout the 1980's weren't terrorists because they were Irish and that doesn't fit your definition. See what they reply.

if they set the bombs off, they are destroying peoples homes and killing people, that is domestic terrorism, if they were to blow up the Capitol, it would be terrorism because they killed people and destroyed a tax payer funded building, raiding the Capitol does not cause harm to the building or the people, so it is rioting, not domestic terrorism. simple enough for you?

BULL F**KING SHIT

Terrorism is the instigation of terror to extort an outcome that would otherwise not be due to you. Almost all dictionaries are incredibly careful about how it is defined. You are talking nonsense.

Antithesis, if you get people asking you to define domestic terrorism, cite them this:

18 U.S. Code § 2331:
Paragraph (5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A)involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B)appear to be intended— (ii)to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii)to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

It goes on to give other sections about other various parts of law.

Will do!

you are an idiot, i said DOMESTIC terrorism

18 U.S. Code § 2331:
Paragraph (5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A)involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B)appear to be intended— (ii)to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii)to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

It goes on to give other sections about other various parts of law.

dangerous to human life: they had no guns, they caused no harm. to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping, there was no mass destruction, kidnapping or assasination

dangerous to human life: they had no guns
5 guns were recovered, two pipe bombs and 11 mason-molotov cocktails.

they caused no harm.
1- police officer dead.
More than 50 injured.

to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping, there was no mass destruction, kidnapping or assasination

Mass destruction occurred to the point where the Vice President and VP elect were evacuated from the building, legislaters and lawmakers had to shelter in place and take cover.

Try again.

who shot first, did you forget the 5 people in the mob that were killed, the mob would have come in peacefully if they hadn't attacked first. really though, what do you expect, they are obviously conservatives, of course they have guns, but were the guns drawn?

In truth i have not heard of the pipe bombs and molotov cocktails, but if you considered them alone to be proof of it being domestic terrorism, then the BLM "mostly peaceful" protests are also acts of domestic terrorism, and since most of the people in the Capitol didnt do much about those, then they shouldn't do anything about the raid on the capitol because it was only once and they had it coming for them if they didn't think that the BLM "mostly peaceful" protests were not acts of domestic terrorism, which also shows corruption and corruption in the government needs cleansing, we can all agree with that.

honestly i think i made this part too long, ill shorten it down if you want me to

kamala is super liberal, liberals are sensitive (in nice terms,) and she saw that the mob looked angry and she wanted to evacuate, so she also had mike pence evacuate with her because he was of higher authority and therefore, supposed to be saved first.

makes sense to you yet?

At the gate they were not peaceful. The area was off limits.

Play stupid games, get stupid prizes.

Here's a photo reel of guards opening the gates for the maggats.

They rushed in, all hurt was unintentional, if you send me the link to the video, then I would be able to see how hasty and careless they were. Do you honestly think that one person against a whole mob could keep every one of them behind the fence? No one could, it was better to let them in because they could have injured themselves a lot in their haste and carelessness

https://twitter.com/PhilipinDC/status/1347028917685800961

The hurt was intentional.

you truly are stupid, first, you said they let them in, the cops didnt, then you said it was intentional, i saw those people saying "whoa whoa whoa" and helping the guy up, the one guy that only grabbed onto a police officer was the only one doing anything violent, the others were either helping the person pinned down or were pulling the guy away from the officer or were standing on the top of the steps peacefully, then most of them walked away from the stairs, you only see one side of stories.

By all means, please tell me where I said that the cops let them in?
If you mean my image? it was written in heavy sarcasm.

All of those people saw that there was a line. People were going around, only a few helped. People saw that police were having a hard time, and they kept walking. This was not the only place. So, I'm not sure what you're talking about. Seems like you're flailing just to be right about something in an era where Trump supporters are finding out they've been horribly wrong.

Cognitive Dissonance.

the people around the cop that was pinned helped, the people on the other side didnt because there would have been a bunch of people there which would have slowed them down. it was the same for the one person grabbing the cop, its simple logic

Maybe one did. But the others didn't. They weren't trying to pull that guy off of the cop. They were trying to pull the cop. And this isn't the only place either, they pushed past the cop line on the stairs too. They pushed past doors, they hauled cops out and started beating them. A cop died because he got beat with a fire extingquisher. There were MAGAT (MAGA TERRORIST) who were trying to push down a barricade of cops. No one let them in ever. No one let the gates open for them.

you are stupid, look at the video, they are pulling at the guy, not the cop. "they pushed past the cop line" what line? the cops were either helping the pinned one or getting the guy off of the cop, the others were just watching them go through, no pushing there. "pushed past doors" it's called opening doors. as for the other things, send me links to prove those, they didn't let them in at all? tell that to your other liberal friends here on imgflip, they will deny it.

youtube.com/watch?v=QVZvp-Dv0gg

Watch that for me please?

A member of Congress is a citizen. BLM marching for the death of an individual, and then the losers BITCHING AND CRYING OVER Losing, aren't even two fruits to compare. One is an apple, and the other is a grain of sand.

a member of congress who betrays the constitution and national laws is a traitor. BLM burned down people's homes and businesses, why, because one person was accidentally killed. we walked into the Capitol, we meant no harm (we being the people who aren't BLM protestors) and we had a valid reason, fascism is bad, and it got into our government. one is an apple, the apple is BLM