no proof illogical

I'll remember this logic the next time I'm a judge presiding over a rape case. No matter how many eye witnesses are brought in, no matter what material evidence is discovered, even if there is video evidence of events playing out exactly how they were portrayed I'll just say "sorry, I've found not evidence. You're free to go Rappie McRaperson. Have a wonderful day!".
If the court says no evidence it must be the truth!

They didn't bring any evidence to the trial.

They got on camera and told you they had mountains of evidence, krakens of evidence, but when they get in court and the judges ask to see the evidence, the lawyers (now under oath) say they have no evidence.

Saying that there was voter fraud doesn't make it true.

In which case did it happen that way? Be specific please.

The federal case in a PA court,argued by Rudy himself. In his opening remarks, he said "widespread, nationwide voter fraud" and when the judge said "So, this is a fraud case?" Rudy said, "This is not a fraud case." In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

So...why are they there is this isn't a voter fraud case that they said was a voter fraud case in the opening remarks?

In Bucks County, Pa. Trump’s attorneys signed a joint stipulation of facts that explicitly admits that they are not alleging fraud despite publically claiming this was a voter fraud case. The stipulation of facts reads in part: “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots.” The stipulation also says they don’t allege or have evidence of “misconduct” or “impropriety” in connection with the challenged ballots.

In Maricopa county, AZ, Trump campaign attorney Kory Langhofer told a judge, “We are not alleging fraud in this lawsuit. We are not alleging anyone stealing the election.” Langhofer also said that the limited number of counting errors were done in good faith while operating the machines.

Tucker Carlson blasted Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell for claiming without evidence that glitches in electronic voting machines had improperly favored Biden. “She never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another,” Carlson said. “Not one.”

Nevada trump lawyers sent a letter to AG Barr claiming massive voter fraud. Yet. Yet, when they filed their actual cases in court it was about the accuracy of a signature matching machine. Whether or not the signature matching machine is working properly is not evidence of massive voter fraud.

So they are not saying they have no evidence. They are arguing the case on different grounds. That is a different thing entirely.

No. Not at all. They are getting in front of the camera and saying "VOTER FRAUD!!!! WE HAVE EVIDENCE!!"

Then they get into court and they say there is no fraud and we have no evidence.

The best they can do is argue things like the observers weren't allowed to be close enough (remember the obersers that weren't there? they were, but they had to stay 6 feet away during a pandemic).

Or that the signature matching machine is inaccurate- but only over signatures in this one county that Biden and not any of the others, even though the same machine was used for the counties that Trump won and it was fine.

You misunderstand. You don't need evidence of voter fraud if you are asking the court to hold ballots turned in after the final date.
That would be like presenting a bannanna to a judge to prove you weren't speeding.

Yes. You are right.

And that's exactly what's happening in court.

They show up with a banana and say "well, no voter fraud but we've got this banana."

This is why they lost 50+ cases.

...because I enjoy beating a dead kraken...

https://youtu.be/PDd8shcLvHI

In almost every case, they are dismissing them on procedural grounds and REFUSING to hear the evidence. This in no way shows that the evidence is “insufficient”.

“There’s no point explaining it to you. You have chosen to be blind.”

You can’t light a fire to create light without three things: fuel, an ignition source, and oxygen.

Your argument contains none of the above, which is why you cannot illuminate my blindness. As usual, you’re floundering in a sea of ignorance.

It’s all been addressed.

The facts don’t care about your feelings.

There is no evidence of voter fraud other than the Trump supporter who got busted having his dead mother vote.

✌🏼✌🏼

No one needs to explain the lack of the existence of voter fraud. You have to PROVE voter fraud, which no one can do because there is no proof.

You’re speaking of fictional events, and by “fictional,” I mean they’re not real.

You talk tough but i bet in real life you’re as meek as a mouse.

Ain’t that right, you yapping little chihuahua?

You haven’t explained anything. Why did the counting stop in those 3 locations, then resume hours later?

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/04/facebook-posts/battleground-states-did-not-stop-counting-votes-el/

You’re promoting fiction.

No response here either, right?

Got nothin? Thought so.

You expect me to give a shit about what the partisan hacks at politifact claim?

Provide sources to contradict...or are you a Trump lawyer waiting for the statute of limitations to run out in five years and cry that there’s a conspiracy against you?

You’re a hack.

They aren’t refusing to hear the evidence. Trump’s lawyers are refusing to produce evidence.

If the cases are dismissed for “standing” or “laches” as almost all of them are, yes, they are refusing to hear evidence. Your ignorance is impressive.

You are correct about “standing” and “laches.” The courts will not tolerate the shenanigans and antics of Trump’s elite clown patrol because, at some point during the course of court proceedings, you have to produce evidence...it doesn’t have to be a kraken, any evidence at all will do...and when you are incapable of producing any evidence of any kind, yes, the judge will throw your ass out of court and you’ll be lucky to not be sanctioned for wasting taxpayer dollars.

Congrats on googling “laches” by the way. It just doesn’t mean what you think it means.

No, “laches” means, in legalese: “an unreasonable delay in making an assertion or claim, such as asserting a right, claiming a privilege, or making an application for redress, which may result in refusal.”

That’s the Oxford definition.

That means that Trump’s lawyers are taking entirely too long to produce evidence that they don’t have because they don’t have any.

But I’d guess you’d like to world to believe that even judges that Trump appointed are throwing out his garbage lawsuits because of some larger conspiracy? And yet Trump
STILL has yet to produce one iota of voter fraud? Because, at this point, if they waited too long to file suit....and I don’t think the statute of limitations is 30 days or less...why not release the kraken of evidence and let the people decide?

I suggest you familiarize yourself with Occam’s Razor.

‘ No, “laches” means, in legalese: “an unreasonable delay in making an assertion or claim, such as asserting a right, claiming a privilege, or making an application for redress”’

Yes, that’s exactly what I said in less technical language. You literally can’t even hear anything which challenges your arrogant preconceptions, huh? No wonder you can still pretend there’s no evidence.

It’s not challenging my “arrogant perceptions.” Your arrogant perceptions challenge reality...and loses.

Badly.

Like the Buffalo Bills and the Super Bowl badly.

I’m not pretending there’s no evidence. There is no evidence. Where is all the evidence? Why have we not seen any of it? Why have they admitted time and time again in courts of law across the country that they have no evidence? This is all documented and verifiable.

You’re the one pretending there is evidence. You haven’t provided one single shred of anything that proves anything. The only verifiable instance of voter fraud was some guy who had his dead mother vote for Trump. And he got caught. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Your wishful thinking won’t make Trump steal a second term and the facts don’t give a flaming fart in a windstorm about your feelings.

“Why have we not seen any of it?”

Because you are deliberately ignoring it.

Where 👏🏻 Is 👏🏻 It? 👏🏻

Where 👏🏻 Can 👏🏻 I 👏🏻 See 👏🏻 It?👏🏻

NewsMax has been banging the drum of this fictional voter fraud...and then their weasel CEO came out and said they had no proof when they were threatened to be sued into oblivion. They were just capitalizing on dummies to make money off advertising. FoxNews and OAN followed in their footsteps, airing disclaimers stating they are completely full of shit.

But that’s the thing, isn’t it? Predatory capitalism at its finest; Trump (a “billionaire”) has been begging his piss poor minions for $5 here and $3 there...but that stupidity adds up quick.

PT Barnum once famously said: “A fool and his money are soon parted.”

There’s no voter fraud and there never was. The revolution will not be televised because there won’t be one. Joe Biden will be inaugurated as this nation’s 46th president on January 20, 2021and there isn’t a damned thing you can do about it.

There’s no point explaining it to you. You have chosen to be blind.