Okay apples, if I'm going to criticize you when you post something patently absurd, I have to also give you credit when you're on track. There was a segment of the so called right wing media that did attack president Obama, but certainly not anything close to a majority of that right wing media.
I thought it was wrong then, as I still do. I figure, why attack him for ridiculous bullshit, when there are considerable policy issues that he's so dead wrong about? The problem as I see it apples, is lazy media, regardless of political viewpoint, always takes the easy way out.
The math related to this is pretty simple though. Well over 90% of *all* media coverage of Trump was negative, and most of that was lies made up by the mainstream media. So if we break it down, it was probably something like this:
90% of all media is liberal. Of that 90%, probably 90% was rabidly anti-Trump to the point that they had no problem lying about him, or at the very least reporting 'facts' that were unsubstantiated. Doing the math, that means over 80% of the overall media was lying about the president of the United States on a regular basis.
That leaves 10% of the media being conservative, and if only 10% of that media engaged in the same type of behavior regarding president Obama, that means only 1% of the overall media was rabidly anti-Obama to the point that they had no problem lying about him, or at the very least reporting 'facts' that were unsubstantiated.
Yes, of course my numbers are for illustrative purposes only, so they could be different. But... not by much, I do believe. I think they are accurate in the sense that they show the wide gulf of disparity in how the media treated the two presidents.
Caption this Meme
