Politics and stuff

So what?

twitter is a big social media website, so a bunch of the voters would come here and follow the president they voted for to hear more from them, but that is a huge difference, which implies that biden doesnt have nearly as many legal voters for him

WHAT?

Anyone IN THE WORLD can have a Twitter account. You don't even have to be human to have a Twitter account. I voted for Biden and I DON'T have a Twitter account.

HOW CAN YOU *POSSIBLY* be serious? All this implies is that Trump is more popular on Twitter - it doesn't imply ANYTHING about voting habits.

He is much much more followers on there, also he has much much more followers on Facebook, which makes it confusing how biden won when almost everyone has a social media account on Twitter, Facebook, or both

No confusion: Biden voters don't give two shits about Twitter and Facebook.

And they don't have to. Why the f**k would they? Who cares?

So you consider yourself a model of other Democrats? You think that they all do what you do? This is a genuine question, do you think those things are true?

NOBODY CARES ABOUT TWITTER. JUST YOU WEIRDOS.

Answer my question

I answered it twice.

My question is do you think most of the other democrats do what you do?

What does that even matter???

I've never been on Twitter or Facebook.

and i said almost everyone

Good luck using that argument in court. Simple answer- you can't.

we cant because they dont accept any evidence of democratic voter fraud, but they will accept conspiracy theories of republican voter fraud

Hey idiot, tRUMPf has been in office for 4 years. He SHOULD have a higher number of followers. We will see what happens once Biden has @POTUS title.

yeah he has, but still it is a huge difference

But seriously. Who cares. Why is this even a thing?
Biden can eat more eggs than tRUMPf.

dang, the same goes with facebook, which is much larger, trump has 34,840,994 followers meanwhile biden only has 7,914,322

Which proves nothing, except maybe Biden followers may do less social media.

but it still doesnt make sense because if they dont do social media, they are most likely present at his rallies because they have nothing better to do, but there's hardly anyone at his rallies

...ever got the idea that not everyone following Trump is also a supporter of him?

Not to mention the fact that if Twitter & Co. would care to remove all the multiaccs the actual number of his followers is way, way smaller.

Yeah I got that idea, ever thought that everyone following biden supports him, yeah, so by that logic, i am correct because I'm saying its weird how trump has much more supporters, according to it, and biden has less but he won the election with less supporters

Not every "supporter" is a voter.

yeah, i misread that part, i thought he said that everyone following him was a supporter

Prove it

THAT is what you consider needing proof???

How many multiaccs are there? Actual number based on what?

A simple assertion was made. Back it up

Who cares? Twitter is not and was never meant to be a form of predictive polling. You can follow Trump on Twitter if you live in the Philippines. You can program a computer to follow Trump on Twitter algorithmically. A US legal voter is neither under obligation nor much incentive to even HAVE a Twitter let alone follow someone on it. The point is there are too many ways to knock this down as a gauge on voting base.

But you want hard numbers on that? In God's Holy name why? We measure these things using an actual election, not by auditing Twitter accounts.

I agree with you.
But let Craft_Werk answer for self

No answer is needed. It was a stupid challenge.

antithesis had said what was needed to be said.

Still have to answer for some one else. The assertion by Craft_Werk was stupid.

The assertion that a follow on Twitter is not a vote of support?

No. No, I don't think that is a stupid assertion. I think your response is what's nonsense here.

This assertion:
“Not to mention the fact that if Twitter & Co. would care to remove all the multiaccs the actual number of his followers is way, way smaller.”

I’m surprised you cannot deduce that from my comment “How many multiaccs are there?”

Who cares? It's Twitter. If somebody told me four months ago that I should follow Joe Biden on Twitter to legitimize his election win, I'd have laughed in their face.

It could be Purgeboy with 80million alt accounts all following Trump for all the difference it makes. Twitter has zero weight - ZERO - in predictive modeling for the election.

Biden didn't hold super-spreaders.

it matters because normal people are independent, they choose what they want to do, cultists do not

Is it really news to you that the election doesn't come down to who has more followers on Twitter?

Is that all you got?
tRUMPf has been in office for 4 years. It would be sad if he didn't have a higher number.
Your desperation is SOOOOOOOO delicious.