"Only a small majority of Trump supporters reject the peaceful transfer of power"

Where did you get that information pal?

a little birdie told me

I would love for you to point out when Trump supports have made a terrorist attack.

funny you should ask

https://newsone.com/3883517/el-paso-shooter-patrick-crusius/

I'm glad you can find a psychopath out of 81million people.

I didn't have to go looking, you came right here

dat a good meme

Why thank you I made it myself.

Ok, I'll check it out.

Yes, I regularly go out and kill people because I feel no emotions.

Yes, there for all Trump supporters just be racist murderous bigots.

*therefore

Grammar was never my strong suit.

#NotAllTrumpSupporters

Likewise.

Or most.

Wow, such compelling evidence.

Things that make you go hmmm

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/24/us/domestic-terrorist-groups.html

Far-right = BLM intresting

this comment does not compute

Hmm yes, propaganda.

The New York Times is a worthless rag.

X doubt

what sources do you consider valid my man

I really don't give half a shit about your pretty little chart.

And here you have another opportunity to bedazzle us with the superior quality, research, and lack of bias of the sources that inform your worldview

What do we know about the Michigan governor kidnapping plot?

As it turns out: A lot!

Thx local police & FBI -- the boys in blue keeping us safe

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/09/us/michigan-militia-whitmer.html

Oh lol yes anarchists are usually extreme and no they weren't Trump supporters try again.

You realize your SN announces yourself as a "ConservativeCrusader," right?

You do know what crusaders were, right?

Yeah, I do. Basically, the equivalent of warmongering democrat and republicans of the day went to war against the Islamic civilizations for oil, I mean land, and the false belief that they would go to heaven going to war against them.

Oh and the Roman catholic church sick of the Muslims attacking them.

I believe the Crusades were much more a function of pan-European diplomacy and a Papal power-grab.

The Muslims (and the pagan Lithuanians) were a nice scapegoat to get Christian nations to stop attacking each other for awhile.

The Crusades were only partially successful in that. Christian nations continued to squabble with one another.

And of course, the Crusades were not at all successful in the long-term project of actually taking the Holy Land.

At least, not until much much later in history when we get to Zionism. Different motives than the Crusades, but Muslim nations in the area didn’t exactly feel that way.

Which is why

Well yes, I said land.

Did you read my profile?

Yes, they were defending Christendom after centuries of Muslim aggression.

*This claim is disputed*

Yes, I’m sure about that. The simple fact is that Islam expanded through conquest. Virtually all of the Middle East we now think of as Muslim was Christian and was conquered by invading Muslim armies.

Pretending Christian Europeans, for no reason at all, attacked peaceful Muslims who were minding their own business is vile slander, which is what I expect of foul shits like you.

If you go back far enough in history, most every square inch of earth has been conquered and re-conquered and conquered again. Human history is shaped by conquest. Islam wasn’t the first or the last to do so.

Example: The modern-day map of Europe is in many ways descended from the legacy of Roman conquests, and indeed the influence of Christianity as a state-backed Roman religion from the time of Constantine onward.

Why isn’t that legacy just as much of a problem?

Do you think it was all justified as the Romans were “civilizing” barbarians?

Well: I guarantee you the Islamic conquerors saw it that way, too. And they weren’t exactly wrong, either. Middle-Age Islamic art and science was cutting-edge and bolstered by the networks of common culture and trade that the caliphates established.

And let’s not forget how European Christians conquered and colonized a gigantic chunk of the world not to mention the entire New World. All of that activity in the aggregate was outrageously more destructive (or, to use more neutral language, “impactful”) on human history than the wave of Islamic conquests in the 600s-700s.

Also, I hate anime.

Kyle Rittenhouse is a hero.

dude was just a kid who got suited up and went looking for trouble all thanks to propaganda spewed out by folks like you.

You.

Now his victims are dead and he might not have a future because of you.

You.

His “victims” all attacked him first. His “victims” were part of a mob burning down a town. His “victims” included a child rapist and a wife-beater.

It’s nice seeing the left come out in defense of a repeat child rapist. It gives such moral clarity to the issue.

no u