It's all I want. Stop the genocide.

Looks like I'll be voting Republican then.

Perhaps not, but more and more people join the Pro-Life movement every year. States are beginning to pass better laws to protect unborn children.

Sooner or later everyone will wake up to how abhorrent the practice is.

The Pro-Choice argument has been flawed from the beginning. It took the Supreme Court dozens of pages to find its initial justification for it, and then they had to amend it in a later case. 98.5% of abortions are undertaken purely because a series of poor decisions were made by the couple involved, not due to rape or incest. Cases in which the mother's life are in danger are exceedingly rare, but should be handled accordingly.

Destroying a future is no way to solve a problem.

I respectfully decline your suggestion, but thank you for your civillity.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/30/facts-about-abortion-debate-in-america/

The opposition to it, as I said, is growing. If we look at these stats (taken from a very pro-choice website), we see that a very large percentage are undertaken purely because, "they weren't ready" or "the timing wasn't right":

https://www.umassmed.edu/news/news-archives/2019/05/who-are-the-1-in-4-american-women-who-choose-abortion/

I don't think it's OK to kill a human being in its first stages of development because "the timing isn't right" or "they aren't ready". According to that website that means we're murdering 93 people per 1000 live births purely because those responsible for their conception decided they were a mistake. Additionally, there are those who abort children with mental or physical defects. I don't think it's fair to declare people like that less-deserving of respect even after birth, and don't think it's fair to do so just because they've not been born yet either. That to me reeks of the reasoning Hitler used to justify exterminating Jews, Catholics, and other 'undesirables'.

Now, there are of course situations in which the life of the mother is at stake, and in these then procedures which may result in the death of the child are still ethically permissible. The difference, so you don't think I'm being a hypocrite, is that the procedures try to save the life of both the mother and the child.

The question I ask myself, with regards to abortion, is, "If you could speak to the millions and millions of people who have been aborted, and asked them whether they thought they deserved to be aborted, then what do you think they would say? We'll never know, because their lives were cut short without asking them. I consider that absolutely vile and an affront to the basic right to self-determination all human beings deserve.

These articles are interesting reads on the subject no matter one's position. I highly recommend them.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6457018/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207970/

The majority of abortions are sought by women who already have a child.

Abortion access is good

When Democrats can just print the votes they need it doesn't look like they need YOU either.

I could get a time machine, take you to Nov. 5th, bring you to where they offloaded 100K+ pristine ballots with only biden checked on every one and you wouldn't see anything out of the ordinary.

Next time, take some pics, them things ain't just for selfies if ya haven't heard.

Guess what courts do with "I would need a time machine to prove that it happened"?

Yeah, and the Earth is flat.

You have the right to believe in a flat earth if you want to, but voter fraud does exist. Just because it got someone with a D next to his name elected doesn't make it a good thing.

Voter fraud on the level you're suggesting doesn't exist. There has never been any evidence to support its existence, no matter how hard the Cult of Trump wishes it.

Here's a question you guys never seem to have an answer for: if the Democrats supposedly manipulated the presidential race so that Biden would win, why the hell would they give up so many House seats, or not get a bunch of Republican senators voted out and take over the Senate?

It's time for you to take off the tinfoil hat and face reality: Biden won fair and square in a legitimate election, and the democratic process works.

There are 2 types of democrats
Those who believe their party would never do such dastardly deeds
and those who know if they were honest they'd never win an election

Which certainly explains why only 1 Republican has won the Presidency by popular vote in the last 3 decades, and it sure wasn't Don the Con.

Speaking of which, you might want to check why he quietly folded his very own commision on voter fraud after they found no such fraud.

And just as I predicted, you completely failed to come up with an answer, and instead spouted off more rhetoric. This is why your side is made of failure.