You know that "other app" that your conservative family and coworkers are joining? Here's what they do there.

The funny thing is...the more those Trumpturds, Nazis and other deplorables are using alternative social media sites, the more these companies are setting up restrictions against being (mis-)used by these groups.

Because they all want to earn money. Parler will let them asswipes use their services for a while to generate more media attention, then declaring restrictions a la Twitter and Facebook to get even more media attention.

Once we see the first messages from Republicans using Gab we know that the GOP is dead.

AOC's right. Many trump supporters are potential terrorists. They should be put on a list, shunned, and watched.

The easiest fix is for us all to kill two of them. 🤔

Only if they try to kill me. Or someone I care about. Or a person of color, a woman, or a trans person.

Only joking

And how are you going to know if some random person getting attacked in the dark fits that description?
So you support big government? If Trump was proposing what AOC did you would say it is oppressive. It's ok though, I didn't realize I was for some rather oppressive things until you guys pointed it out. I had bought into the propaganda at that time too.
Also define "person of color".
When the media uses it they mostly refer to people that are darker shades of brown. As if white, or to be more accurate when talking about people, paler brown, isn't a color. You gotta appreciate the intelligence of the media, they are some real geniuses.
I know an artist who said no one is white or black, rather we are all shades of brown. But the divisive media and narrow minded cave men prefer to think in simpleton ways like black and white. They think we the people are like them, but not all of us.

I support what AOC is suggesting. I believe trumpism, with its blatant dishonesty, corruption, sexual predation and xenophobia, should be suppressed.

Do you want to suppress all dishonesty, corruption, and xenophobia or just when it obtains to what you call "Trumpism"?
Because that sounds rather prejudiced itself, implying that only Trump supporters are guilty of such things. People complains about our over crowded jails, well what if we jailed someone for being dishonest? Is there anyone out there who hasn't lied? The thing is, that stuff has to be allowed because that is how freedom works. I may not agree with everything you say but I defend your right to say it. About five years ago or so I thought the majority of Muslims was bad and potential terrorists. And I probably would have supported having them put on a list, shunned, and watched. I was wrong in my thinking in two ways. One, not all Muslims are like that, mostly just the Sharia ones and they make everyone suffer, Muslim and non Muslim alike. Two, it is oppressive to them and violates their freedom.
Overall this makes me think of what Thomas Jefferson said, "I prefer dangerous freedom to peaceful slavery."
Hear me out on this. Freedom, in it's truest form will be dangerous. There will always be people trying to push the bounds of social morality and behave wrongly with their freedoms. Killing innocents with guns and saying racist or rude things. This is because we live in a fallen, sin filled world and people would rather do wrong than right.
Do not think less freedom and more security will be better. There is no such thing as "peaceful slavery", an illusion, maybe, if one remains intoxicated everyday living under oppressive tyranny.

Sexual predatory actions is wrong and shouldn't be allowed, But this can get out of hand too. Just looking in one's general direction could be considered "sexual harassment" by some people.

I don't believe only trumpists are guilty of those things, but they are especially guilty of those things. Not all of them are planning violence, much less genocide, but as to the dishonesty, corruption and xenophobia, I believe they are all guilty. Some of them are clearly planning violence, so I don't care if they feel being shunned and watched is oppressive. And I expect and accept that some of them feel the same way about me. That's fine, because we're enemies.

I don't believe we are in a fallen world. I was raised Christian, but I now believe Jesus was a fictional character. Humans are just one of the more violent animals.

So in the end of the day everyone is suppressing everyone because there is a lot who are guilty of dishonesty and corruption. The media and the majority of politicians mostly.
"That's fine because we are enemies."
I do not think of you as my enemy. Sure we may have some disagreements but that doesn't make us enemies. The media, on both sides, has been pumping out so much division and hate about the opposite side, it is no wonder people view each other as enemies. They want you to think like that. Because while everyone is for more security against the other it makes it easier for the ones in charge to lower the iron curtain. Already many breaches has been made to the Constitution and freedoms have been violated. This meme is about free speech zones. Is that really a thing? If it is then we have a much bigger problem than what a few internet tough guys are saying online. Like the First Amendment being taken away and a "free speech zone" being necessary.

Would you want to tell me more about why you don't believe in Jesus now? What has changed your mind?

No, everyone is suppressing everyone because trump is a criminal and his supporters are talking about killing liberals.

That's a fcuking lot of whataboutism. And you can find the best examples not only over there in poolitics.

The world is not being divided in black and white in general, but with Trumpturds, it's pretty easy: if you chime in with Trump, support Trump and generally willing to bend laws of any kind far beyond the redlines to show your allegiance with Trump, you are a danger to the values of any civilized democratic nation. And must be treated as one.

If Thomas Jefferson would be alive today, he sure would not prefer to live in dangerous freedom anymore.

Don't forget the threats of violence.

That's under "bending laws"...if I would list every single reason why Trumpturds must be outlawed and sanctioned, the comment becomes a mile long.

I was wrong. I mistook the "whataboutism" for changing the subject. Yes I did the what about thing. What is wrong with bringing in a different idea when it fits with the subject? I have had the errors of my thinking pointed out by people using the what about method. Most progressive reforms probably began with "what about this" or "what about them". When America won it's independence from England I am quite certain some was asking "what about the slaves?"
I see nothing wrong with expanding a discussion to include a broader subject. I also know you guys have done the same thing too. I think you are just opposed to it here because I am challenging you to think differently than the narrative made by the propaganda. You talk like you are concerned with dishonesty and corruption but you complain when I bring other guilty ones to the discussion. You prefer being told what to think rather than doing it yourself. I know I might be sounding a bit rude now but I am trying to save you boy. The ones in charge is using the media to spread their propaganda and with it they are manipulating people. Don't let it dictate you. Don't let it tell you what to think.
You accuse Trump supporters of being a danger to the values of a democratic nation. You, after you assumed all Trump supporters are guilty of those things and should be suppressed. Suppress them because they think differently, also they are dangers to democracy. Do you see what you are doing?

This is not whataboutism. The subject is about how Trump supporters, according to AOC, are potential terrorists and should be suppressed. I merely expanded it to include anyone who fit the accusations against Trump supporters. And this is where I have a problem with people like you. You profess on being against certain issues but really you're not, you are only against it when Trump supporters do it. Take dishonesty and corruption for example, Trump is hardly the only one guilty of this, but you accuse me of "whataboutism" when I mention others who are guilty of the same. And therein lies the difference with me and you. My actions are just, I point out wrongs regardless of who does it. You only do it when it applies to Trump supporters. You have allowed the propaganda to poison your mind until you have become the very thing you want to oppose. Bigotry.
Not all Trump supporters support the awful stuff you are accusing them of, most don't, I sure don't. And don't ignore the fact that if I was saying the same thing about Muslims, or any other group, you would be calling me prejudiced.
But it's those racist dirty Trumpturds they deserve all the hate! They do the same thing!
Yeah the propaganda has done fine work with you mate. As Aldous Huxley said, "The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human."
And do you know what that does? It causes hate, as you said, "Hate, hate, hate, hatred for all, one and all." You summed it up nicely.

America is being divided based on skin colors. And most people see it as white and black. Or they use the virtue signaling way and refer to some as "persons of color".
I will ask you the same. Define "person of color". Who is being included by the usage of "person of color"?
But just because the media and politicians are dividing people based on skin color, that certainly isn't the only way Americans are being divided. You seem to see it as Trump supporters and everyone else. They have done a good job dividing the different political parties too. They want chaos. As the Assassin Creed game says, they will bring order out of chaos.

Thomas Jefferson lived in a time where people was tarred and feathered. The only thing that would scare him is the ever overreaching government and the people's willingness to trade freedom for false security!

bUt ThAtS wHaT nAzIs DiD

MAGA baby
Fascists can never be wrong for doing right.

Sounds vaguely like genocide, doesn't it?

At least they won't be regulating environmental destruction. That's the kind of thing that made Hitler so evil.