No stars with those bars

*kamala

Thanks, totally missed that...😆

Now that you have seen me I would like to remind your 2 braincell ass that those red lines are meant to look like the red part of the american flag

Gotta love that conspiracy theorist comeback just every time someone says something that makes more sense than your bullshit you just say that

$10 says you're also a holocaust denier

Bad bet. But 911 was an inside job...

I honestly can't tell if you're joking

Not on that last one. And I'm convinced JFK was shot by the limo driver.😉

Nope they are proud of being traitorous, communist useful idiots.

unbelievable

Thats very true. We as conservatives, and especially Christians, should live by a much higher standard. And this is mostly apparent at the rallies each side has, and the fact that you don't see conservatives burning down whole cities. But I was pointing out that symbolism has been a big thing behind their agenda. (Much like the illuminati). And when you see so much of it, its hard to write it off as just a coincidence.

"Understand: I'm not condemning you..."
Bro, your first statement was condemning me as not being a Christian.

And I fail to see how you proved the meme to be false. When you look at the socialist policies the left is proposing, and how many profess to be Marxist, the meme makes sense.

BTW, it's just a meme on the politics page. No need to get so offended.

"A Christian...of which, in this world, there are only a handful at any given time...would, when confronted, have recognized it and, at the very least, deleted it. But you refuse, protesting your innocence."

No True Scotsman fallacy. Simple and to the point. You don't get to decide who is and isn't a Christian based on whether or not they cede your ill-made point. You didn't prove anything, only cited the authors of the design and their post-facto explanation of the design....using Snopes most likely. Memedave may be wrong, but not believing your copy and paste argument doesn't change his status with God, information you're not privy to.

You seem to imply that a Christian who sins is not a Christian when Paul, a seasoned "Apostle" wrote 40 years into his ministry that he still does what he shouldn't do, and doesn't do what he should, a clear confession that sin was still alive and working in him despite his relationship with God (Romans 7:14-), so parading around with your "I know all men's hearts" flag is just blatant
self-righteousness on display, pointing ironically to someone, quite possibly, unfamiliar with the doctrine of Grace.

You're pretty triggered dude. A response is not someone getting offended, however 4 lengthy comments, one after the other, is evidence of someone hyper triggered. lol.

Christians sin....doesn't mean they're not Christians. Pointing out a sin isn't evidence that they're not Christians either, so my comment stands. Pointing out someone lying, killing, or otherwise only describes an action they did, not a relationship that isn't bound by those actions. Screech it all you want. You're wrong. I don't know Memedave's status, and neither do you. And you sure as hell can't tell by a few words written on a meme site.

" Who said it *changed* his status...? No one. I only identified his extant counterfeit status."
What the f**k do you think counterfeit means? One is either Christian or not; there is no "counterfeit christian". Saying he is not real, is saying he is not Christian. Don't play like there's an inbetween. Was Paul a counterfeit as well...being that he deliberately sinned and deliberately chose not to do good? The answer is, "No."

"No true Christian would....(insert your list of faults here) is a bullshit statement, and fits perfectly within the No True Scotsman fallacy, so take your self-righteous BS and sell it elsewhere, cause I ain't buying it. Whatever...To each his own.

First, I know what I am. You don't. That's your problem. You think you know more than you do, and it shows, especially to me. Your paperback cult theology is a tell as well, revealing what is, at best, a person who flunked out of some third rate 7th Day Adventist Bible college in South Carolina (no offense to SC folks). Your boastful arrogance about a Faith, you don't even aspire to is a sure sign of someone who was once in a dysfunctional church and left after "seeing the light" bursting out of said paperback cult novel. Quoting scripture is fine, but you still seem hesitant to even address that which has been put forth, instead cherry-picking your go-to verses, often used by culty little trolls such as yourself.

"Everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin."

"If you love Me, keep My commandments."

"Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase?"

"No one who remains in Him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to sin has seen Him or known Him."

For instance. The first quote doesn't call into question one's salvation or standing with God, only reveals their relationship to sin, and there's nothing untrue about the verse. What you don't understand is verb tense and how that affects the reading.
" poieô ", translated as "commits" speaks to an ongoing condition of causation or creation, a lifestyle of sin, which is literally "missing the mark". An alcoholic is a slave to alcohol, not because they have a drink, but because their life revolves around the ongoing practice of drinking, which eventually enslaves them. Likewise, one who sins occasionally, or "misses the mark" isn't the same as someone who is committed to that lifestyle and, hence; a slave to it.

The same tense is used in the second quote, only the time changes..it's future active indicative, which means it is a practice one will continue doing. It doesn't speak to occasionally missing the mark, only a lifestyle of striving to obey Jesus' commands, which were simple and few. It also doesn't speak to one's status if they mess up.

Paul's line, in the third quote, taken right in the middle of a lengthy case he is making for grace that spans several chapters. He answers that question with an emphatic, "no," but he was referring to those who were trying to justify a lifestyle of continuance in the sins they were committing "so that grace may abound", not the one off that Paul states that he himself is guilty of in the following chapter...You know...the one that you have still no response to.

Your last quote speaks to the practice and continuation of a lifestyle of sin as well, verb tense the same as the others. No where will you find a verse that says one is a counterfeit is they commit a sin. You will only find vague references to those who make a continual lifestyle of it, and even then there will be no foregone conclusion that they are not Christians, only that they are suspect at best. And, since you use John's words, I'll close with them to make the point you avoid...

1 John 1:
5 This is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all. 6 If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth; 7 but if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us."

He reiterates the point here that both Paul, Jesus, and himself have already made...
One in Christ practices their walk of faith by striving live it, but if they sin and confess it, He is just and will forgive them. He also says that one who says he has no sin is a liar, which is indicative that Christians still sin and need to recognize that truth. No where, does the Bible say that a sin committed is indicative of a "counterfeit Christian" That's something cult leaders say as a means to control their followers.

Bingo! Without a doubt, China Joe Biden has become a communist. 👍🏻

Even the creator of wikipedia has condemned it and is trying to start a sight that will show all views on a subject.

2hsnp9.jpg (click to show) Upvoted!

Three Red Banners

They will song change the national anthem to the one of the USSR

No.
In fact Biden is just an "electable " chump playing goofy so the house can put Harris in the oven office.
Pelosi has almost said as much several times and stopped just short.

Hes really trying but he shouldn't be allowed on Twitter or anywhere they have a live mic. 😁