Imgflip Logo Icon

Wikipedia is heavily biased against President Trump, according to Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger.

Wikipedia is heavily biased against President Trump, according to Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger. | LARRY SANGER, WIKIPEDIA’S 
CO-FOUNDER, WRITES THAT 
WIKIPEDIA IS HEAVILY BIASED
AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP; FOLKS, WIKIPEDIA WORKS 
FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY | image tagged in president trump,donald trump,wikipedia,liberal bias,election 2020,barack obama | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,358 views 29 upvotes Made by Right1 4 years ago in politics
 memeCaption this Meme
33 Comments
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y
We have known it since 15 January 2001. It’s always hilarious when insiders expose left wing bias.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Wikipedia is owned by Soros.
2 ups, 4y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
You’re right. Soros is one of the people who run Wikimedia Foundation. That means that Wikipedia is a propaganda vehicle of this disgusting, leftist globalist. I hope President Trump reigns in the big tech companies.
1 up, 4y
10 Guy Meme | REALLY?! | image tagged in memes,10 guy | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
No, he's just salty that wikipedia actually became actually profitable and stuff after he left it, so he continues to post "criticisms" of wikipedia

It's kinda funny tbf
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Sanger’s facts are correct. Wikipedia bias is the only thing this meme discusses.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Wikipedia doesn't really have a bias though
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Sanger’s article proves the bias.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/wikipedia

These two articles vindicate wikipedia of it's bias....
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Also, I would like to point out that the reason why the scandals aren't explicitly listed is because there is a separate document for that.

And instead of a "public profile" section, Obama has a separate section called "public image"; pretty sure those are similar if not the same.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
yeah, just like imgflip is very biased against leftists!
0 ups, 1y
Actually its the opposite. Imgflip is biased against rightists.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
That's the problem your bad President doesn't get equal "opprotunity" nor opportunity because he did commit crimes as a Democrat.
Because the Wikipedia is manipulated by schmucks who are sympathetic to his causes, i.e Socialism and Communistic ideals.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The bad president in the above image was in reference to Donald Trump :) Sorry that I have to clear that up for you as you seem to be quite thick.

I love how you say "wrong because wikipedia." It demonstrates you don't know how to use it as you take faith only in what is written on the wiki page itself without actually checking the sources listed on the page.

Basically, you don't know how to do your own research. You have a slight case of Extreme Confirmation Bias.

Thanks for clearing that up.
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You tell yourself whatever you have too, I know what is without someone who has admitted he has an unnatural wish of death on another person trying to tell me how they are level headed and I,m not. Not to mention your screen name reeks of the opposite reality.

Now with an actual Quoting of your words (unlike your quote above),

"He's the first and so far only person who I have ever wished that they would just leave this earth already."
Got TDS? oh yes you do.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ah, you never took Latin.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
And you can just continue to be a hairy pussy refusing to man up and stand up to a man who constantly grabs you and f**ks you over time and time again.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
I prefer the Trump way than the Demotard way.
>> Still using ad hominem in a vain attempt to augment your argument when it only weakens it.

Speaking of getting rich off their political positions, Look at all the rich Democrats. Ever think you'd like to see their tax records? Biden provided his before election.

Ever wonder where their fortunes came from? No. You don't care. As long as you can hate on a President you don't like his party or personality.
>> He broke precedent. If you believe there's a politician who has crooked money, raise it to the FBI. Otherwise, put up or shut up. If there are charges, I'll listen to the case and make my own judgement.

You refuse to accept that he's fighting for the poeple and not his own enrichment.
>> Lol. The Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause prohibits the president from accepting personal benefits from any foreign government or official.
Trump has retained his ownership interests in his family business while he is in office.
Thus, every time a foreign official stays at a Trump hotel, or a foreign government approves a new Trump Organization project, or grants a trademark, Trump is in violation of the Constitution.
Trump has repeatedly pushed his properties as avenues to secure his favor, and multiple foreign officials have stayed at his properties while lobbying his administration.
Saudi officials and an Iraqi Sheik stayed at his hotel when lobbying for their interests.
China approved multiple trademarks for his family’s brands while negotiating trade policies.
Trump promoted his club in Doral Florida for the 2020 G-7 Conference, and then the White House announced the multi-million dollar contract was awarded to Trump’s own resort after Trump’s suggestion. Ultimately, this contract was canceled despite his attempts to abuse his position.
And every time he goes to golf at a Trump property, he funnels taxpayer money into his family business—violating the Domestic Emoluments Clause.
To date, Trump has spent over $100 million taxpayer dollars to golf and vacation at his own properties.

He wants the whole country to do well not just his party like the Demcrats who are so desperate to hold any power they are willing to do their own cheating and fraud.
>> Which is why he demonizes the entirety of the party, right? Hypocrite. Desperate to hold power like how Senate in 2016 wouldn't even hold a vote for Obama's Judicial nomination because "election year" when it was ten months out.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Buy a Mirror Tard, Bye Bye.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Obstructing Justice, Profiting from the Presidency, Soliciting Foreign Interference in U.S. Elections, Advocating Political and Police Violence, Abuse of Power, Engaging in Reckless Conduct, Persecuting Political Opponents, Attacking the Free Press, Violating Immigrants' Rights to Due Process, and Violating Campaign Finance Laws.

But you've got TDS and will just deny, deny, deny, deny. Thought I'd humor the idiot though.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
1 up, 4y
Leftists never bother with evidence.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You asked for what laws he broke. I stated them. The failure is not in the answer but the question. Nice try though.

The trail of evidence starts with Trump’s attempt to get James Comey, the FBI director responsible for overseeing the investigation into Trump’s relationship with Russia during the 2016 election, to drop an investigation into National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

When Comey refused, Trump fired him.

Trump made two more attempts at stopping the investigation by trying (unsuccessfully) to fire
Robert Mueller, Comey’s predecessor. Then, Trump ordered White House Counsel Don McGahn to create a false record indicating that no attempts took place – McGahn refused.

Trump has repeatedly attempted to intimidate or influence witnesses in proceedings against him.
In all, Robert Mueller’s investigation revealed multiple instances where there was “very substantial” evidence that Trump had committed obstruction of justice.

Among Trump’s most shocking instances of obstruction, he ordered former White House Counsel, Don McGahn, to have Mueller removed. McGahn’s clear recollection was that Trump directed him to tell Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that conflicts existed and ‘Mueller has to go.’ McGahn said he responded that he could not make such a call and that the President should instead consult his personal lawyer because it was not a White House issue. Feeling “trapped” by his role in the White House, McGahn threatened to quit.

In January 2018, a New York Times article broke a story revealing that McGahn threatened to walk after being asked to fire Mueller at which point Trump backed off. Trump complained that McGahn had leaked the article and that it was wrong, yet he decided to resort to his obstructive behavior to address this problem. Trump then ordered McGahn to deny he demanded to have Mueller removed. He asked him to create a false record of their meeting which he would use as evidence to dispute the article. This is what obstruction of justice looks like.

Obstruction of Justice requires the following:
Obstructive Act - All corrupt conduct that could prevent justice—even if the action itself is not successful.
Nexus to a pending proceeding - When the obstructive act is connected to an official proceeding or a potential official proceeding.
The corrupt intent - When someone acts knowingly and dishonestly to gain an improper advantage.

And that's just Obstruction of Justice.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
CNN's not my cup of tea, but thanks for the compliment, I appreciate it.
 memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 6
  • 360E0FB4-1076-482F-8DCB-1B0C175CE2F3.png
  • 54EF4433-4218-498B-A453-391E8FEFAFBD.png
  • 473C31AA-1361-4150-9DCE-50A25BBC9989.png
  • 1E219128-A787-4C23-B223-C282DBF05CEB.png
  • A39BF807-7487-402E-ACA5-1D2142278DD0.png
  • 1F19F7B7-D808-4E8B-BAE2-EEF3F47B8D3C.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    LARRY SANGER, WIKIPEDIA’S CO-FOUNDER, WRITES THAT WIKIPEDIA IS HEAVILY BIASED AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP; FOLKS, WIKIPEDIA WORKS FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY