WHO WOULD BE SO DUMB AS TO VOTE FOR A GUY THAT HIS FORMER BOSS WOULDN'T ENDORSE UNTIL THERE WAS NO ONE ELSE. ANYONE BUT BIDEN!

That just proves the contempt they have for voters, especially their own.

What's sad is it might be true🤣

4 f**king years to come up with a candidate and this is the best they could field?

Beyond belief that he is the DNC candidate!

Well they rigged it again as in 2016 and I guess if all past performance predicts likely future performance we should expect that in 2024 they will do it again.
They've gone on and on about Russian election interference. When all along it's they who have been in bed with Russians peeing on them. The rigged 2016 primaries are 100 times bigger interference than anything they haven't been able to substantiate that Republicans got from Russia. However, proof of their involvement and benefit from Russia is only now coming to light. Reality is they've probably been rigging for a century or more and it's only now being revealed because of widespread communication access outside the controlled media system.

HEY ORANGEMANBAD - YOU’RE RIGHT (1):

IN 2016 HILLARY TOOK OVER THE DNC ELECTION PRIMARIES, IN 2020 THEY RIGGED IT AGAINST BERNIE…THEY LONGER THEY GET AWAY WITH THIS CRAP IT WILL EMBOLDEN THEM TO BE EVEN WORSE IN THE FUTURE:

U.S. Donna brazile: Hillary Clinton's campaign took over the Democratic National Committee's funding and day-to-day operations early in the primary season and may have used that power to undermine her rival Senator Bernie Sanders, according to the party's one-time interim chairwoman.
The DNC official, Donna Brazile, now a political analyst, wrote in Politico Magazine on Thursday that she discovered an August 2015 agreement between the national committee and Clinton's campaign and fundraising arm that gave Clinton "control (of) the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised" in exchange for taking care of the massive debt leftover from President Barack Obama's 2012 campaign.

It wasn't illegal, Brazile said, "but it sure looked unethical."
"If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead," Brazile wrote. "This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party's integrity."

https://www.newsweek.com/clinton-robbed-sanders-dnc-brazile-699421

HEY ORANGEMANBAD - YOU’RE RIGHT (2):

RUSSIA WAS IN BED WITH THE CLINTONS, WANTED HILLARY ELECTED TO CONTINUE IT, AND WITH HER IN OFFICE TO KEEP THE PAST CONCEALED. THEY DEFINITELY DIDN’T WANT A ‘WILD CARD’ LIKE TRUMP IN OFFICE:

There was clearly pay-to-play pay-offs between Vladimir Putin and Hillary Clinton starting in 2010 when Hillary got Putin billions in donations from 29 U. S. corporations who helped Putin build the Russian equivalent of Silicon Valley in a suburb of Moscow called Skolkovo.
Hillary also arranged, during the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit, to give Putin $400 million to build a uranium enrichment plant in Russia.

The Uranium One deal between Bill/Hillary and Putin netted a $145 million in pay-to-play pay-offs to the Clinton Foundation.

For Bill’s part in the treasonous sell-out of the entire American uranium market, Frank Guistra (Canadian owner of Uranium One) and Carlos Slim donated $200 million to the Clinton Guistra Sustainability Growth Initiative.

The lobbying firm APCO Worldwide, who did a great deal of free work for the Clinton Foundation while representing the Russians (Rosatom) in the Uranium One deal, filed reports recently that indicate that the Uranium One deal was worth over $30 billion.

https://aim4truth.org/2018/03/05/the-russian-reset-is-nothing-but-outright-treason/

HEY ORANGEMANBAD - YOU’RE RIGHT (3):

FORMER NSC CHIEF OF STAFF: JOHN BRENNAN BURIED EVIDENCE THAT PUTIN ACTUALLY FAVORED HILLARY IN 2016

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that former CIA Director John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually wanted Hillary Clinton to win the the 2016 presidential election.Fleitz says House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump. “More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.” The former NSC chief of staff further stated that “Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”Fleitz suggested that Brennan relied upon “low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win … ”

https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/23/fred-fleitz-john-brennan-buried-evidence-putin-favored-hillary/

WIDESPREAD COMMUNICATION ACCESS OUTSIDE THE CONTROLLED MEDIA SYSTEM HAS DEFINITELY PLAYED A PART OF SHOWING SOME OF WHAT’S GOING ON.
I THINK THE ADVENT OF THE HUGE MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES CREATED THE ABILITY FOR THEM TO BROKER CROOKED DEALS THROUGH DISHONEST POLITICIANS AT A SCALE NEVER BEFORE IMAGINED; AND THESE COMPANIES HAD NEW ABILITIES TO HIDE THE PAYOFFS THROUGH THE MAZE OF THEIR CORPORATIONS.
MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES DON’T HAVE ANY ‘NATIONALISM’ AND WILL GO TO EXTREMES THAT PREVIOUS NATION LOVING BUSINESS LEADERS WOULD NEVER CONTEMPLATE; AND THIS HAS TOTALLY CHANGED THE SCOPE OF CORRUPTION COMPARED TO JUST 50 YEARS AGO.

Hi JW,

Good to see someone else putting fact out there with a good understanding of what's behind it all.

I have a question for when you have time to answer that a friend put to me which made me wonder but I could not concede the total validity of the theory.

If Joe and Kamala are the best candidates that the DNC can muster. Have they actually put them forth so as to ensure that Trump is re-elected? Because they know that it will ensure a fail safe re-election of Trump.

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts when you have time to respond and I will let you know things he used to support the idea.

Thanks

Hey OMB,

Good question, I’ve actually thought about this many times over the past 20 years.

The most recent times (before biden/harris) was Romney/Ryan (2012) and McCain/Palin (2008) – both the republicans running for president were weak, and when you added their vp choices it fairly guaranteed republican losses. This year in 2020 the Biden/Harris ticket is not the best the DNC could field but sure looks like it is guaranteed to lose…..

If not a ‘conspiracy theory’, but reality, why? Who benefits?

Well there are many that believe there are a few groups like The Trilateral Commission, The Council of Foreign Relations, and The Bilderberg Group who control both parties, and when one party is in power they get their agenda implemented under that party’s ‘guise’. And when the other party is in power they get their agenda implemented under that party’s ‘guise’. And that they purposely alternate which party is in power to keep the American public at odds with each other and distracted from seeing what is actually happening, while at the same time ‘distancing’ themselves from responsibility/repercussions.

Let me know what you think, JW

Hey,
I think you summed it up pretty well.
Both the past history and who the players are and what they contribute to the real life events.

The only variation to things was the 2016 election with Hillary seemingly the favorite and popular vote winner losing to Trump. He was clearly not the establishment pick and although it would seem he still isn't we the have to concede that the party in power is being allowed to stay in power by the deep state components by their pick of the worst candidates fielded.
The friend further theorises that he was put in place by a group opposing the deep state components and that he is compromised to this secondary group. He has in his head that he is in a position akin to Hitler, yes Hitler. In that the deep state/illuminati were the ones who saw his rise to power and Hitler then went against their wishes and he seemingly wishes that if Trump is compromised even to this secondary group that he will go against their wishes and take care of the peoples best interests.
The flaw in his theory is that if their are 2 different powerful forces and you are aligned with one of them and then betray them then you most probably will have both of them coming to sort you out. In which case your probably not going to stay alive as both groups will do everything in their power to get you out. I think more likely is it's a devilish trick in the attempt to convince people that the deep state doesn't exist or that they are actually aligned to Trump and not the Democratic Party.
thanks for taking the time there.

Hey OMB,

I think when the dnc primaries started they had already conceded losing no matter who they nominated…I think that they probably have some stronger candidates that they convinced not to run because if they had, and then lost to Trump, they would be viewed as ‘failed’ candidates which would weaken them if they were to try again in 2024.

I don’t see how a ‘secondary group’ could survive the scrutiny of the big 3 (CFR, TC, BB). What is your friend contending the second group’s agenda is…and why can’t it be to take care of the peoples best interests? What if there is no secondary group but just a handful of powerful people who have resisted the big 3, not joined them, and ‘pushed’ Trump to run?

In 2016 Trump was truly a wild card, the media dnc & republicans ridiculed him; Trump even alluded to running as an independent because of it.

Once Trump took office he had to fight the republicans almost as much as the dems and media….the house & senate were republican controlled when Trump took office and he still couldn’t get them to pass his agenda/bills…

"I think when the dnc primaries started they had already conceded losing no matter who they nominated…I think that they probably have some stronger candidates that they convinced not to run because if they had, and then lost to Trump, they would be viewed as ‘failed’ candidates which would weaken them if they were to try again in 2024."
Mostly agree with your statements, they would have internal polling eluding to Trumps continued popularity to know their chances and history were against them. Although Bernie and probably Warren are on the too old side now for 2024 and no one would believe Bernie if he went again, they were garnering solid pockets of support. But ultimately even with the push further left for Dems both those candidate would have deterred enourmous chunks of usual Dem supporters. The rest would be advised to not be a failed candidate for sure.

"I don’t see how a ‘secondary group’ could survive the scrutiny of the big 3 (CFR, TC, BB). What is your friend contending the second group’s agenda is…and why can’t it be to take care of the peoples best interests? What if there is no secondary group but just a handful of powerful people who have resisted the big 3, not joined them, and ‘pushed’ Trump to run?"

I don't see it either and besides why attract extra attention from the 3 and I had thought he believed they were acting with Trump as the face in the peoples best interests. But he seems to have developed a belief that Trump is compromised to the Secondary group and they are thwarting his attempts to do the right things. I think they are working with him still.

"Once Trump took office he had to fight the republicans almost as much as the dems and media….the house & senate were republican controlled when Trump took office and he still couldn’t get them to pass his agenda/bills…"
And he still hasn't had full Republican support although it's much better than at the beginning. I think Trump and company have made a lot of things happen for the better and the Deep state are throwing tantrums as their power and influence has been dismantled although they're still not defeated. In time it will be known the things he and his company (I mean colaborators of course) have achieved and when the disingenuous critical medias taint on events is removed and the hidden actions are known he just might end up being viewed as the greatest President yet and someone even with his flaws, to be admired and respected by all fair people worldwide.