Imgflip Logo Icon
23 Comments
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
PRETTY SURE THAT THIS IS WHAT THE HISTORY BOOKS WILL RECORD | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Cringing at Trump's foreign policy "successes" | pretty please give up your nukes.  -DJT | image tagged in trump kim signing,kim jong un,trump is a moron,donald trump is an idiot,north korea,foreign policy | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
oh

you don't think it'll be this?
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Member Berries Meme | MEMBER AT THE BEGINNING OF THE RONA WHEN LIBS WERE SINGING BOUT WORLD PEACE? | image tagged in memes,member berries | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
nope

enlighten me
0 ups, 4y
https://youtu.be/omEDLKS5pbY
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Wow, KF! This is one of your weakest memes yet... unless you're referring to the cabal of Brennan, Clapper, Stzrok, Page, Comey, McCabe, Rice, Biden, and even president Obama that politicized the FISA courts and tried to prevent Trump from winning, then tried to undo the results of the 2016 election. *THAT* is what's like Watergate.
1 up, 4y
Hah

If Obama had wanted to torpedo Trump’s election chances, he could have made all of this FBI knowledge public. In retrospect, he probably should have.

But he didn’t do that: he kept it under wraps because he *didn’t* want to interfere in the 2016 election.

That’s what “Obamagate” theorists will never understand or seem determined not to understand.

Multiple indictments and convictions of close Trump associates later, you guys still don’t get it.

Who knows what has not seen the light of day yet thanks to Trump Administration stonewalling. I’m looking forward to what the Biden Administration is prepared to do on this front.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
True but it’s about Obama spying on the opposition like Nixon and includes his group of morons
2 ups, 4y,
3 replies
this a good 1

if you're not sure why the FBI would "spy" on a campaign actively corresponding with Russians about seeking dirt on the opposition then you're a special kind of stupid
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
3 replies
I thought you folks listened to those interested in gangbanging with children

oh well

guess I don't know my audience
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Go ahead, keep trying your best to link Epstein and Clinton, a guy who hasn’t been president for 20 years and never will be again.

Meanwhile, I’ll roll with these sworn affidavits (filed years before Epstein killed or — ahem — “didn’t kill” himself and became a meme), which link up with public knowledge about Trump’s New York playboy party days and multiple photographs of him hanging out with Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Alright Ted! I'm no lawyer, and who knows if you are or not, but either way it's nice to see someone with the ability to call KF on some of the legal BS he posts. Outstanding!
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
His drawing a distinction between “declaration” and “affidavit” seems legit but it’s not.

At all. lol
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I guess that's why people hate lawyers then. What seems to be common sense, isn't.

For the non-legal mind, and dumb it down for us please, what is a declaration in in the legal realm? (I think I have a decent handle on affidavit...)
1 up, 4y
Never thought I'd be coming back to this thread...

https://www.upcounsel.com/affidavit-vs-declaration#:~:text=declaration%20is%20important%20in%20the%20business%20world.%20Affidavits,are%20made%20without%20the%20writer%20being%20sworn%20in.

Here's a quick primer on those two terms. The difference (a minor one), exists but it's just not germane to this case. The witnesses signed "under penalty of perjury."

The ability to counter-sue? Irrelevant. Trump isn't suing these women and never will, because any defamation claim against them would in effect become a rape trial for him (as proving the truth of the matter asserted is an absolute defense to libel). The last thing he wants. And he, a billionaire, doesn't need whatever paltry sums he could recover from them.

Tl;dr It's a big ol' red herring intended to get everyone thinking about procedural irrelevancies rather than the substance of what the two female witnesses here swore to.

A brilliant trolling effort really
1 up, 4y
I don't have to try to link Epstein to Clinton. Clinton linked himself to Epstein.

And for an SJW, why does the fact that he hasn't been president for 20 years matter? You SJW types are whining about things that happened more than a hundred years ago, right?

There's so much evidence against the Dem elites, that I really think you'll end up on the losing side of this one.

And quite honestly KF, should there be a losing or winning side? Shouldn't both sides agree that no matter which of their political boneheads had *any* involvement with that guy, that it was wrong?
2 ups, 4y
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
Your "audience"???
For your "public masturbation on the subway," irrelevant, attention seeking politics clown?
3 ups, 4y
Wow, so now Stephen King is the arbiter of what's correct and accurate in the political world, hey KF?

What, you couldn't find a meme from Robert DeNiro or Alec Baldwin?

Let me help you out with one of my favorite DeNiro memes.
1 up, 4y
You mean Nixon and Obama because they did the same thing.
It's like watergate but with morons memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
FUTURE HISTORY BOOKS WHEN THEY REACH TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY: