What do Nixon and Trump have in common?

Are those quote marks actual quote marks DT? Did Woodward say that?

If true, and you consider him reputable / reliable, why did he hold on to this *damning information* for SEVEN months?

It's just my $0.02, but I've already added this to the list of allegations the left has tried to use against Trump, but FAILED. Some of this stuff seems almost impossible to make up, but the media did, and all allegations have proven to be FALSE. And this is probably only about 1% of the crap the media has made up about Trump... pathetic...

- Trump called US soldiers who died in WWI losers and suckers (even Bolton said this was not true!)

- Russia placed bounties on US troops (and that Trump supported that?!?!!!) Trump told reporters that if the reports were determined to be a fact, then “we would hit them (meaning Russia) so hard, your head would spin.” (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-afghanistan-bounties/trump-says-us-would-retaliate-if-bounties-on-us-troops-proved-true-idUSKBN25G1WO)

- Trump's had US Ambassador to Britain lobby to have the British Open golf tournament played at his resort in Turnberry, Scotland.

- Trump said building of internment camps by China for Uighurs and other ethic minorities was the 'right thing to do'

- NY Times report that scientists were afraid of the Trump administration planning not to publish a climate-change study, even though the study had been available for 7 months

- CNN reported that Trump aide Anthony Scaramucci was involved with the Russian Direct Investment Fund. He was not. CNN retracted the story, but certainly without the headline fanfare they used when they reported the false story

- Trump campaign had early access to hacked WikiLeaks documents (later admitted false by The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, NBC News, and CNN)

- Robert Mueller possessed internal emails and witness interviews proving Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress

- Trump Created a Secret Internet Server to Covertly Communicate with a Russian Bank

- Trump had bust of MLK removed from oval office (these last two go back a ways, but it shows that this has been going on since he took office... or as we all know, since before he took office)

- etc.

- etc.

- etc.

The media just can't stop lying to us about president Donald Trump. But people still believe what anti-Trump propagandists like Rachel Maddow make up about Trump on a daily basis.

Pathetic.

I'm not interested in your gish gallup rant.

Trump is corrupt, you can't undue reality with your "alternative facts"

You can't prove that anything I said is wrong, so you resort to name calling.

Typical.

You don't even have the balls to answer the simple question I asked.,

He has no interest in facts just pushing his leftist propaganda.

From the people that bring you claims without evidence, slander without evidence!

No answers to what you were asked. Answer his question.

The burden of proof rests with Fat_Elvis, whatever he is trying to prove, he has to prove for himself. So far, he has a lost of claims that have nothing to do with my meme.

When some evidence and facts are presented, I'll respond. However, as long as the questions have nothing to do with the facts, and are rhetorical nonsense, I'll continue to ignore them safely.

When you ask a question it implies you don’t have the answer therefore you can’t prove it. So he asked you a question you are avoiding the answer which is surprising because you have some bulkshit perspective on everything even when you dont have facts. So Elvis saying no answer so you’re sort to name calling is correct.

The question is not relevant to the facts, it is a rhetorical distraction, which worked on you.

You are distracted by Woodward's reputation being questioned, and thereby have lost focus on the facts Woodward has reported.

The interviews are recorded. Woodward's reputation is proven over decades of reporting. Fat_Elvis came here to distract, and you are his target audience.

And yet you still avoid the valid question. Why withhold this startling information that could have purportedly saved countless lives?

Real question:

Why did Trump sit on information that could save lives?

Woodward isn't the president,he is a journalist, he documented and recorded. Why are you asking about Woodward, and not Trump's behavior?

Because you are being disingenuous, and trying to distract with the rhetorical question.

Why are you asking me?

You misunderstand. It is not my job as the listener to prove you gish galloping list of premises correct.

That is your job, as the one who made the assertion, to provide evidence to your premise.

I don't misunderstand anything.

If you don't want to do it, that's perfectly fine. This is still America, at least until Biden, gawd forbid, gets himself elected.

And you still didn't answer my simple question. (well, third question, actually...)

Not even enough balls, nor belief in your own meme, to do that. Pretty sad.

An example:

Trump and his inner circle obstruct justice.

Source:
1. Inner Circle
https://apnews.com/ad355d2c983e4a7c85bc17e86d8c563f

2. Trump
https://apnews.com/e0d125d737be4a21a81bec3d9f1dffd8

This proves... what? If this was Jeopardy, the question would be, what is nothing?

A court conviction of witness tampering and obstruction, proves obstruction.

Facts is facts

Ya gots nutin.........................................................................................................