Imgflip Logo Icon

I don’t have to do what anybody says cuz I don’t feel like it

I don’t have to do what anybody says cuz I don’t feel like it | SO HERE WE SEE POLICE WITH GUNS DRAWN TELLING HIM TO “FREEZE” AND THE SUBJECT DECIDES TO WALK AROUND AND GRAB SOMETHING OUT OF HIS CAR; WHAT WAS HE GETTING IN HIS CAR? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? TEMPT FATE? IF PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO DISREGARD INSTRUCTION FROM POLICE THEN YOU HAVE NO LAW. | image tagged in police brutality,police,liberals,democrats,law and order,we live in a society | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
623 views 7 upvotes Made by anonymous 4 years ago in politics
47 Comments
[deleted]
7 ups, 4y,
2 replies
He had children in the car, he was checking on the children, no gun was found. And cops are not allowed to shoot someone in the back for walking away.
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Drake Hotline Bling Meme | check the kids in the back seat reach under the front seat | image tagged in memes,drake hotline bling | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
You're relentless, I'll give you that! Enjoyed our chat earlier on this subject...cheers :)
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He wasn't reaching for anything, he was opening the door and going to get in when the cop grabbed his shirt then started shooting,in the back.
2 ups, 4y
You were there were you? I thought he was checking on the kids...now he was just getting in the car? I'll stop bothering you about it, we obviously disagree, I'm just giggin' you now :)

I'd still like to know what you would have done if you were in his position though...was it worth risking life to pull that stunt?
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Typical leftists depiction. Oh he shot him in the back for walking away. Nope, he was reaching for something in his car. Who said he was checking on children in the car? You?
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Did they find a gun?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Jacob Blake had an 'open warrant' for domestice violance.
Police gets a phone call about a domestice dispute.
Blake resisted and refused to comply, and reaches down under the front seat.

...and that's how people get shot regardless of skin color.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Bullshit. Bullshit. Bullshit.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Alternative angle shows Jacob Blake fighting with police on the ground, before getting up and walking around the car.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_HBhYetkbQ
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Yeah and?,.... still not a reason to be shot. 7 times. In the back. How thick is your skull?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
AND?
...and your whole argument just fall apart and you're still sticking to it, thickskull.

Learn the law.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Soooo, it's ok to shoot an unarmed man in the back. 7 times. Got it.
0 ups, 4y
I did not say that, you did, got it?
0 ups, 4y
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Don’t know, haven’t heard the details from the investigation. Have you?
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Exactly, so you aint got shit to say about it either, on the surface , it's a man being shot in the back 7 times infront of his children. But according to you f**ks, completely acceptable.
1 up, 4y
Could have been avoided very simply. Follow the lawful order of the police. Upset and Black doesn’t make you above the law. No one knew what he was reaching for or had in his car it was a domestic violence call that he was involved in somehow. It’s too bad he he was shot, but it was also his own fault.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y
You can see it in the video
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Check the manual. They seem to have different rules for black folks and white folks.
1 up, 4y
Only according to liberals and white guilt purveyors from Minnedishu. You think they shot him because he was black but they shot him because he continued to reach for something in his car after being told to stop. They didn’t know if he was going to come up firing, so likely wouldn’t matter what color skin he had.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Police aren't allowed to murder people just because they didn't follow instructions.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Depends on the threat level, most states have laws requiring you to obey the orders of a policemen in exercise of his duty. Let’s hear the facts. What did he grab or reach for in the car? He directly contributed to his death by ignoring law enforcement instruction. When they have their guns drawn they usually mean it. What kind of society has cops who just make suggestions. “Hey! Mr. Bank Robber would you please stop robbing this bank. Oh sorry you don’t want to, okay I’m just gonna stand here and write down your license number.” Nonsense.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
2 replies
NO. THERE ARE NO STATES WHERE POLICE ARE ALLOWED TO EXECUTE YOU FOR DISOBEDIENCE. You REALLY have to learn something about our country if you want to keep lecturing people about these things - we DO NOT do things the way things are done in whatever police state you're from.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y
As long as I get arrested and charged by a court and not executed, I don't care.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Who said that jackass? No one said that. That’s your over the top leftist Triggered word twist. Most states do have laws requiring compliance to police orders. In this case he not only refused to follow orders with guns pointed at him he decided to walk around and reach in his car. The cop who had his shirt saw something that caused him to fire. Had he followed the orders of the police he would likely be completely uninjured. Only an idiot would allow someone to reach in a bust out their gun and shoot at them. If you don’t want to get shot, don’t reach in your car after the police have drawn their weapons and told you to freeze. You are not above the law because you are black and upset.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You. You did. Just now.

Listen, I've had enough. I've enough of your lying, I've had enough of your gaslighting, and I've had enough of your absolute bullshit. I've given you more of my time and attention than you EVER deserved.

I'm serious here: if you EVER want to find out more about the United States, you can come live here - I would be all for that. It would do you some good to find out more about who we are, and - yes - it WOULD do us some good as well.

But you HAVE to stop pretending you know a lot about us when you clearly don't. It's just too easy to see through it. Your knowledge is not there, and by pretending it is, you just end up writing garbage without even realizing it.
1 up, 4y
Stating that the states have laws about following the orders of police does not equate to it’s ok to kill them for that. That’s your word twist and chicken little hysteria, he wasn’t killed because he didn’t follow orders. As a matter of fact he wasn’t killed he is in ICU but still alive. He was shot because he reached for something in his car after being directed to stop repeatedly. He ignored direction and that led to a threat decision that resulted in himself being shot. HE COULD HAVE AVOIDED THE OUTCOME BY SIMPLY NOT DOING SOMETHING STUPID. I know you and the rest of the Minnedishu white liberals need it to be about race. You have no sense of people being accountable for their actions.

I am an American born and raised so I know my countries history very well I went to school when they actually taught it. Just because I saw the video and said damn what an idiot M,and you saw the same video and said those damn racist cops just like Minnedishu cops. You turned your back on your country long ago. I’m sorry your life didn’t turn out how you wanted and I’m sure it’s America and everyone else’s fault and not yours. Be happy 😃
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Wow all the conservatives racing to justify the wanton shooting of black man smh
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
No just rationally revising the incident as they knew you would portray it as wanton. Like the cop just pulled out his gun and randomly fired it. There were reasons it ended the way it did and the primary reason was the suspects actions.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ehh...I'm gonna reserve final and absolute judgement until more evidence is out there, but from the the preliminary evidence, it doesn't look too good on the cops. Firstly, why 7 shots? One or two would have sufficed if you really thought he was a threat. And according to the attorney, he was checking on the kids. And three fully grown cops they could have tackled him prior to him entering the car.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Well calling it a wanton shooting isn’t consistent with. let’s see what the investigation concludes but I agree with let’s see what he was reaching for or what the cop who was right there saw.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Either way, the wanton part is the police shooting him 7 times. Even if it was definitively true that Blake was reaching for a weapon to use on the officer, 7 shots is WAY too much. But imma wait before reaching a final conclusion.
0 ups, 4y
Ha you think someone can be shot once and not fire back? Once the decision to fire is made it makes no difference, you fire until the threat is neutralized. The decision to fire is the question. One shot or ten makes no difference except to people who know absolutely nothing about guns or humans reactions. The fact that he received multiple wounds, as we don’t know if all 7 shots hit him, is proof that while a single shot to the head might end his resistance, a man can still return fire after being shot.

The other question is how you can portray it as he did nothing to contribute to the situation and you believe that was rational behavior on his part to ignore officers with drawn guns and go back to your car ignoring their commands and reach inside of it.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
What happened to no one is above the law? Are black people allowed to ignore police now? Are they above the law? Immune to it?
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Are police alowed to shoot people in the back now, immune to the same laws?
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
I don't know what is wrong with these people, I could think of one thing,...
0 ups, 4y
That all depends on if the shooting is justified. Would a “reasonable person“, Not a leftist agitator but a reasonable person, conclude or act in a similar or consistent manner. The woke reaction of “right on more free shit“ aside facts and truth matter.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
In the liberal world the police were supposed to stand there , hope it wasn't a gun, and if it was to stand there and take at least 4 rounds to the head before telling him to put the gun down.

Telling him to stop after only 3 head shots? Well that's police brutality and now we can all loot the local Nike store for new shoes...
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Look at you all woried about the Nike stores you were all boycotting.
1 up, 4y
Yes, i boycott. As in --i can afford them because I work and choose not to buy them ... Unlike the people on your side who desperately look for excuses to steal them, wait for you to rationalise why it's ok, then all skip down the road to vote democrat
Lol
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Nobody in my family would be stupid enough to ignore the police and then reach into a compartment out of sight that could hold a gun, especially if they believed the police shoot black people..
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Well of course you can't because you're incapable of determining intelligent behaviour, so much to the point that you can't be sure whether acting like you're reaching for a possible gun Infront of officers is an action that can lead to getting shot..

Quick! Jump Infront of the secret service, making sudden movements and reaching into your inside pocket for a pen!
Then after you've been buried, we'll ask the rhetorical question if whether it's right or not for Octavia to have been shot, despite not having a gun..
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
SO HERE WE SEE POLICE WITH GUNS DRAWN TELLING HIM TO “FREEZE” AND THE SUBJECT DECIDES TO WALK AROUND AND GRAB SOMETHING OUT OF HIS CAR; WHAT WAS HE GETTING IN HIS CAR? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? TEMPT FATE? IF PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO DISREGARD INSTRUCTION FROM POLICE THEN YOU HAVE NO LAW.