Democrat Leadership is a failure

Our elected Democrat representatives is more accurate.

Hasn't Democracy itself... failed?

No it hasn’t. Democracy only failed according to SJW’s and woke Communists who promote a system of government that exterminates it’s own population and forces them to stay in misery.

There could be another form of government that doesn't allow *everyone* to vote, but those with real knowledge.
Democracy let's a drunk person vote who doesn't know who he has voted for.

Who is going to determine who is smart enough to vote? And what will be considered "real knowledge"?

Going to college and having big degrees may mean one is book smart but they could be completely lacking common sense.

I think it is ludicrous to protest in person about the dangers of voting in person. I see no difference between their level of knowledge and a drunk.

And back to schools and colleges, they could very well be doing more indoctrinating than actual teaching. For example people complain about how bad America was for having slaves but history classes often neglect to mention that it was Africans themselves involved in selling other African slaves to Europeans. The same people complaining about how bad slavery was also have no idea that slavery still exists in parts of the world today.
But does being indoctrinated mean one doesn't have real knowledge? Yes, they wouldn't be indoctrinated if they knew the truth.

Some people ignorantly says abortion should be the woman's choice because the baby can't survive on it's own. Well what if big daddy government said the same thing? Oh sure that fancy job and big paycheck makes you look impressive but can you survive without grocery stores? Do you know how to build a house yourself, grow a garden, and basically sustain yourself without going to a store or hiring someone to do it for you? Are you capable of defending yourself from attackers?

You know what 10 to the 8th power divided by the square root of -15% is but you don't know how to change a flat tire?
Again, what will be considered "real knowledge"?

--------------------------------------------

At this point deciding on what "real knowledge" is or who possesses it is moot. Because whoever is in charge to make that rule has already imposed their will on everyone else and the only ones voting will be their cronies who have the same goal.

Say, a test to determine rationality of views and political awareness

And so if you don’t agree with their views they are irrational

So, we need to get the power out of their hands.
A popular revolution is what most people propose but is there another alternative?

The key flaw is “who decides” what is rational or awareness? Who gets to do the deciding?

There is the example of the second caliph in the Arab Islamic empire, (that's something we don't see much of so it might be new, which is a good thing) the caliph, on his death bed, chose 6 people who were respected and known all over Arabia, to choose one person from themselves with a vote. Only the 6 people voted among the 6 people. There was no question of a disagreement or rebellion because all people involved were renowned, mature people.
If a large group of people supports a leader and that leader loses in elections, wouldn't the group feel voiceless?
If the leader of the group is involved in an election process like the one mentioned, wouldn't it be a bit better?

Ya that’s not gonna work. 6 people to decide the fate. What if Trump was the caliph and got to pick the 6?

Lol,
Well then, if u don't want to overthrow the government, wait for a better Pred and have him change the fkin system for good,
6 is not a limit, tho

There’s nothing wrong with the system that a little modification won’t fix. You obviously want rule by tyrants like they have in the Middle East and communists Latin countries.

The Middle East is fked, u have to be there to know what it's like. Do not mention it. And I'm with u tho, nothing i said was meant to imply Tyranny

We at least agree we don’t want Tyranny of any form.

savages