Apologies for the slow reply YaraliXX. With all due respect, your point about beans seems pretty silly. Other than chronic TDS, I just can't understand why people think Trump spends more time on issues they categorize as trivial, than he does on the singular issue of his presidency. It just makes no sense, unless you truly believe him to be a dullard. If you do, please stop watching CNN so much.
Also, I doubt you really follow what Trump does on a daily basis. If you do put effort into that (and by effort I mean not just believing what the media tell you to believe) then I am going to speculate that you don't do so to any significant degree, so you don't have the full picture That's okay, most people don't.
Regarding Goya's CEO, he and Trump operate in an arena way beyond my pay grade, and I assume beyond your pay grade, so perhaps you should consider that from his perspective, the USMCA trade deal is a good thing? And that he gives Trump credit for it.
If so, it only makes sense that he would praise Trump. He may also be aware of everything Trump has done to stop the flow of illegals across the US southern border, which was comprised mostly of central Americans who were using Mexico as nothing more than a speed bump on their way to the US. I have to admit though, it's nice to see a Mexican citizen have the power to drive those on the left somewhat batty.
And I do want to give you credit for your 'on the bright side' comment. Most here on the flip who have been criticizing him for not wearing a mask, seem to be very poor winners. Instead of giving him any praise at all for doing what they said he should do, all I've seen until now is nothing but more insults and attacks on that subject. To which I usually reply that it's no wonder he ignores what those on the left say, because no matter what he does, he's going to catch hell anyway. So kudos to you for being a rational human.
And lastly, I'd like to retract that last sentence of my original post, where I said you helped set a new record in stupidity. That was due to an astounding number of what I considered ignorant memes that I came across in just that one day. I violated one of my own rules by attacking you when we hadn't had any previous exchanges which would justify me taking that approach. On its own, your meme didn't set any records in that category, and you don't seem like the type deserving of such an attack, at least not based on your measured and rational reply to my post.