Yes you do. By downplaying the damage they do you are defending them.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
You are telling people to accept the violence of destructive extremist rioters that are burning cities and murdering people, and have the backing of the mainstream media and many high-ranking politicians. You have also failed to provide any sources to back up your figures.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
You told people not to be "scared" of this violence. Sounds a lot like defending violence to me. And you have still refused to provide a source to back up your claims.
Logic too difficult for you, obviously. The fact that they did riot, burn, loot, and injure people makes them criminals, no matter how "insignificant" you think it is.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Sources too difficult to find for ya?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
Are there even any sources at all for you to find? Did you just pop some random numbers out of the air?
Of course you can't have a normal conversation with anyone. Your "arguments" are that if only 1% of the buildings in a city were damaged, there's no need to worry, and that everyone who disagrees with you need to wear diapers.
And yes, that is exactly what you insinuated - or rather said in so many words.
You don't get a "normal" conversation that way, kid. But you do get a shouting match, which is what you want.
I never implied that I think Antifa will destroy the world. But in the past Antifa has attacked people and burned down buildings. You can't blame me for thinking they will do the same things they have done many times in the past.