SARCASM COWBOY

You mean the one who pushed to get the First Step Act passed?...

...which is a more meaningful step in solving the country’s problems than renaming products

“Criminal justice reform — everybody said it couldn’t be done,” Trump said at the signing ceremony. “They said that the conservatives won’t approve it and the liberals won’t approve it. They said nobody is going to approve it, everybody is going to be against it. It has been many years, numerous decades and nobody came close.”

He thanked the individuals in the room for their efforts in pushing for the legislation, including his daughter, Ivanka, and son-in-law Jared Kushner, who received an applause from the advocates in the room for their efforts within the White House. He also thanked Democrat lawmakers Sens. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, among other congressional leaders, for their support of the bill.

“This was incredible bipartisan support,” Trump said. “Everybody worked so hard on this. Behind me is a cross section of everybody in our country. We have everybody here. … We had everybody wanting this. We had a few people that didn’t and that’s OK. It is impossible to get 100 percent.”

He gave multiple people credit by name. This is not narcissism

They are genuinely asking for information. Googling it might not bring anything up for them due to personal online filter bubbles. So about providing a link instead of mocking them? You stand a far better chance of educating them and changing their mind that way

I recently took a class on doing proper research. It turns out that Google (other search engines too) alter the results based on previous search and viewing history, without you doing anything (personal online filter bubbles). It takes into consideration past searches, what you've spent the most time on, social media habits, etc. Computers do this without us asking it to. So if Octavia and I were to enter the same search words, we would get vastly different results. A relevant article could be the first thing to come up on my search, but could be on page 5 on theirs. The first page of Octavia's results would most likely be liberal articles criticizing Trump. And only mentioning the first step act in passing. Octavia would have to read dozens of liberal leaning articles before he got to one that even comes close to making the point you're trying to make.
You can take a horse to water, but you can't make him drink, but you still show them where the stream is so they don't drink from the latrine.

https://youtu.be/B8ofWFx525s

Yes the search believing it knows what's best is for real.