Mail in voting

And quit with the flag...you don't love America or its flag if you are for voting by mail.

Guy, you're not American, YOU'RE BRITISH!

We've been down this road before, I am an All- American from NYC. I thank God All Mighty that we moved from that cesspool.

NOW you're from NYC too? You said you were from a small town in the same State with no name all the other Trumpites who say "WE... WE... WE..." a wee bit tooooo much (basic red flag) here are from.

Anyways, YES, we've been down this road before. And YES, I DO believe you. You WERE in Britain when Punk and Goth were 'born' there. You were at the Cure's first show. And yes, you listened to the John Peel Show since it's beginning. England is NOT located in NYC last time I checked, or should I Google for a surprise?

Whatevuh ya say, chipmunk.

EVERYONE who makes widdle ol' moi (that's French) upset is from 'another country'?

Naah, m8 (that's a Britishism), only those from another country are from another country hence them being from another country.

In the case of the victim you're so courageouslylyly white knightinging, he went through great lengths to prove he was in merry ol' England when le Punke Rock and Roll was 'born' there and saw the Cure's first gig proving they were Goth, not Punk, years before Goth was even a thing.
He also listened to not just Punk & Goth and whatever came after on ye olde John Peel Show, he goes back to the 60s with Jimi Hendrix on it.

I assure you, we ain't ever had the John Peel Show broadcast anywhere in NYC or the USA for that matter. We ain't even got Radio1, the channel he listened to it on. Shocker, I know, as you got all our channels. But que sera (that's Spanish), c'est la vie (that's French).

That's why he hasn't returned to dispute this, as he recalls that delightful flame war in which he convinced me (as he had intended) that he's a UKian.

Thanks fer playin, silly Alderptan (see what I did there?).

That's Republican bullshit.

Oh...I guess that settles it...
.
.
.
.
... NOT.
I disagree and stand by my hypothesis.

Voting by mail is so anti-American that trump himself voted by mail, and Florida and California republicans WON by using it. Apparently they hate America now.

That's absentee voting. You are calling for something totally different, and you know it.
What you want to build is poisen.

There's still a pandemic going on. Nobody should have to risk their lives for the right to vote. I got my application from my county yesterday and mailed it back the same day. There's going to be voting by mail whether you like it or not. The only thing fraudulent is Republucans' objections.

Then get your ass off the streets, stop protesting in public, stop looting, stop vandalizing, stop burning down our cities.

You must be a californian.

Screw that noise.
Anyone who advocates this just wants to steal an election.

If you can go to Walmart or the store, you can go to vote. Otherwise, please never leave the house ever again and do us all a big favor by staying home forever.

I'm not old enough to vote anyway, so your gotcha fell flat. Next time, at least try to make an argument. I know it's very hard.

Then shut your trap, no wants to your silly-assed opinion.

Nice rebuttal.

Thank you. I'm so very pleased that I pleased you.

You're welcome.

you're a child, a privileged child

And? You're an adult, a privileged adult. What does that mean?

heh heh

And?

First of all, I never claimed I was a know it all kid. Second of all, voter fraud is extremely rare. Third of all, mail in ballots don't benefit any partygoer the other. Is crappy arguments and baseless insults all you have?
https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/ensure-every-american-can-vote/vote-suppression/myth-voter-fraud
https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/new-research-voting-mail-shows-neutral-partisan-effects

Anecdotal evidence. Unless you show me statistics that voting fraud is a pervasive issue, then I won't take your argument. I know voting fraud is rare because the overwhelming majority of the studies and statistics conclude that it's rare. Even if mail in ballots are more susceptible to fraud, the chances of it happening is still so small that it's negligible.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/false-narrative-vote-mail-fraud

Not only that, the CA he's from is not California, IT'S CANADA!
Timbz lives in Alberta.

Projection much?

Canada isn't that bad, guy. You get to watch from the safety of your cabin in the woods the end of the USA courtesy of an orange wannabe tyrant snowflake charlatan that the inbred cretins here elected. By the end of the coming decade, yous is gonna be (that's New Yorkese before you blow a gasket) the leader of North America whilst (that's your talk) what's left of the US (that means not you) scrounge in the woods for acorns

- if you don't catch a major cardiac (also New Yorkese) beforehand.

Enjoy.

https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/494649-the-voter-fraud-fraud
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/04/864899178/why-is-voting-by-mail-suddenly-controversial-heres-what-you-need-to-know
https://standuprepublic.com/voter-fraud-debunking-the-myths/
https://votingwars.news21.com/voter-fraud-is-not-a-persistent-problem/
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/trumps-latest-voter-fraud-misinformation/
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/494189-lets-put-the-vote-by-mail-fraud-myth-to-rest
Proving a bias doesn't prove that the source is factually incorrect. Unless you give me specific examples as to where brennancenter is factually incorrect, whether or not it's biased is irrelevant. Also, I don't think you know what anecdotal evidence is. Anectodal evidence is based on personal stories. Statistics is the exact opposite of anecdotes.

I find it deeply ironic how you bitch and moan about the perceived biases of my sources, dismissing them without substantively addressing them, yet you readily accept right wing biased sources in a heartbeat. Breitbart is one of the most right wing outlets out there, and washingtontimes and the federalist are also right wing from what I’ve read. So apparently you only dismiss sources solely because of bias when it’s against your own side. Sounds like confirmation bias to me. I could be like you and dismiss them all right now, but I won’t. Some of the sources are basically saying that voter fraud exists. No one is arguing that. They point to individual accounts of voter fraud, but no statistics show that it is a rampant and widespread issue. Other sources claim that ballot harvesting is an issue, which I agree with. I would support banning third parties besides family/friends to submit ballots. However, this doesn’t mean you discard vote by mail elections entirely. You also claim that many voter fraud cases go unreported, but there are many safeguards like identity verification, bar codes, and ballot tracking. I would support better enforcement of these measures and the implementation of additional safeguards if necessary. Furthermore, the consequences for voter fraud are so severe that it disincentivizes people to commit voter fraud. Adding a single extra vote is not worth it given the risks associated with it.

Nice dismissal of my argument.

I really don't see how reading a paragraph is so hard to you. I'm not gonna waste my time making paragraph breaks when I don't need to.

If you have proof that voter fraud IS widespread, provide it. The only thing you've said so far is that some small amount of voter fraud is a possibility. That's not much to go on.

Oh cool, an Op-Ed piece is pwoof.

Take some Ex-Lax, it'll help ya.

Kiddding, no it won't.