Imgflip Logo Icon

I thought 2A was about resisting tyranny. Things that make you go hmmm.

I thought 2A was about resisting tyranny. Things that make you go hmmm. | THE RESULTS ARE IN: FACED WITH OPEN AND OBVIOUS STATE-BACKED MURDER AND OPPRESSION, WHAT DID THE HARD-RIGHT SECOND-AMENDMENT FOLKS DO? TURN UP AGAINST THE PROTESTORS WITH TALK OF A “COMING RACE WAR.” | image tagged in maury povich,tyranny,second amendment,police brutality,conservative logic,conservative hypocrisy | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Maury Povich memeCaption this Meme
25 Comments
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y
If you burn down someones business who did nothing wrong to you, you deserve to get shot in the ass.
5 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Nick Young | image tagged in nick young | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
"open and obvious state back murder and oppression"

LOL. Somebody had a big bowl of hyperbole for breakfast in mommy's basement.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
When they say you ate a big bowl of hyperbole for breakfast. | image tagged in george orwell 1984 quote,police brutality,police,oppression,murder,conservative logic | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
How big was George Orwell’s bowl of hyperbole?
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
George Soros | image tagged in george soros | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
How big is George Soros in your financing, treasonous troll?
1 up, 5y
Hmmm didn’t mention him so I guess zero

Bloomberg, people. It’s Bloomberg.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
LOL ---- yeah you're basically Orwell. F**k me man, you have severely inflated sense of self importance.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
And reposting these words basically makes me MLK too, don’t forget

Nah man — I just did my assigned readings in school.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You may have done the reading, but as usual your ability to comprehend the reading, falls short.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Pro-tip: don’t wear heels to these things
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I literally watched you mis-understand or intentionally "fit" what you wanted to MLK to be saying about riots. Even though he was clearly AGAINST riots.

As I said, you're ability to comprehend is below the required minimum for the reading material.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
What else was he against?

Bonus credit: What was he for?
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
LOL...when you can't explain your blatant data fitting, you ask questions to deflect, as if my knowledge of MLK and his teachings would somehow be relevant to your ineptitude.

LOL
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
I keep reposting the quote, because this is about the only section of the passage that you seem interested in or have really internalized.

What else did he say?
1 up, 5y
No, its not...I am interested in his CONSISTENT MESSAGE OF NON VIOLENCE...you simply are looking at the message to "data fit" it to support your narrative.

The problem you keep running into, is that MLK solely advocated for NON VIOLENCE and CONDEMNED RIOTS.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I would call that murder, not state backed. Obviously the cop and his associates were arrested.

Massive hole located.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Derek Chauvin was aware he was being filmed. He looked directly at the camera. You don’t do that without expecting that you’re not going to be prosecuted.

His assumption was well-founded: but as it turns out, incorrect this time. Thanks no doubt to the extraordinary public pressure.

The protests were sparked by this sole act of brutality, but they are about larger issues as well.

What else?

I refer you back to this quote.
1 up, 5y
He also was "restraining" this individual with his hands in his pocket most of the 9 minutes nobody lest of all a cop keeps their hands in their pockets while restraining someone especially when bystanders are videoing the scene. total crisis actor/ pysop BS
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
So now that you can no longer support your claim of "state supported", as the State has arrested the cops, you launch into even more absurdity of what Chauvin "must have known and expected.? LOL

Nothing says I have a well grounded logical argument like proclaiming to know what was going on in the mind of a person whom I have never met.

The twatwaffle is beginning to emerge once more.
0 ups, 5y,
3 replies
We know he looked at the camera filming him and continued on. Speculation can only take us down a few paths. Chauvin either:

1. Believed he was going to get off scot-free, whatever happened;
2. Was completely intoxicated or insane to the point he had no idea what he was doing at the time;
3. Knew that he was endangering Floyd’s life, that he would likely be charged with murder and continued to press down anyway.

Only one of these possibilities really makes any sense. Possibility #1, which indicates a strong and well-founded belief that he was effectively above justice.

This is the kind of state-of-mind assessment that juries are asked to do every day in America, and that a jury will no doubt be asked to do in this case as well, unless he takes a guilty plea first.
1 up, 5y
Or they whole thing was a deep state act see my comment above everything in the media nowadays is total BS
1 up, 5y
"We know how he looked at the camera"

BAHAHAHHA...with his eyes?

KF LOGIC FAIL: Because we know "how" he looked at the camera, that provides us a channel directly into his brain, and from this channel, we can interpret his brain activity which allows us to know EXACTLY what he was thinking.

PUT. DOWN. THE. SHOVEL.
1 up, 5y
2 ups, 5y
Not where I live.
0 ups, 5y
December 8 1941: In other news Japan says Roosevelt's "a day that will live in infamy speech" was an unwarranted act of aggression which will only heighten already tense relations between thew two nations.
Maury Povich memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
THE RESULTS ARE IN: FACED WITH OPEN AND OBVIOUS STATE-BACKED MURDER AND OPPRESSION, WHAT DID THE HARD-RIGHT SECOND-AMENDMENT FOLKS DO? TURN UP AGAINST THE PROTESTORS WITH TALK OF A “COMING RACE WAR.”