You want to okay conscripted labor in exchange for accessing fundamental rights...that's now how anything works.

It's facetious, dipstick. And by the way, I happened to get an A in Constitutional Law in law school, and took 3rd place and won the best brief award in the ABA National Moot Court competition arguing on the side of first amendment freedoms. That's why I know that Constitutional rights are precious but also that no Constitutional rights are absolute. So take your Dunning-Kruger ignorance of Constitutional rights and back off.

I was going to post something similar to jplowry, because IF your meme is facetious, as you now claim, you need to go back to school and get an A in meme-making. Because your meme absolutely misses the mark when it comes to be facetious. Try harder next time, lawyer boy.

Right, as if people could be forced to work a hospital shift AND be required to bring a relative in order to be released from SIP orders. Hell, the hospitals wouldn't take them. And, oh, snap, 13th a
Amendment. How could it be ANYTHING BUT facetious. If you thought the meme could in any way shape or form be serious, it is YOU who needs to follow jplowry's advice.

Other memes are posted that are equally facetious, yet the OP didn't intend so. If you claim it was, fine. I misread.

I am confused however by the reference to the Dunning-Kruger effect. It does appear you don't understand it.