Imgflip Logo Icon

Perhaps they'd hide if it were contagious?

Perhaps they'd hide if it were contagious? | WHAT IF I TOLD YOU THE CORONAVIRUS ISN'T AS DEADLY AS ABORTION; BUT NO ONE HIDES IN THEIR HOMES WHEN CHILDREN ARE KILLED | image tagged in memes,matrix morpheus,abortion,coronavirus | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,160 views 19 upvotes Made by anonymous 5 years ago in politics
Matrix Morpheus memeCaption this Meme
22 Comments
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Based on DNA, we can tell on a cellular level where the mother's body (and rights) end and where a new unique being begins, with a full set of human rights.
Only a monster believes satisfying their genital's appetite is worth killing another easily provable unique human life form with a soul and spirit. Get a vasectomy, you lazy ass. Use any number of methods of proven birth control, including ripping that useless womb out instead of a viable innocent baby.
1 up, 5y
Good point. The vast majority of abortions occur because people want limitless sex without having to take responsibility for the natural outcome
[deleted]
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
In fact, quite the opposite, they drive to the clinic to have it done. It's almost as though the equivalence is arbitrary and false.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You're right thesis, for once. Dead babies (killed by choice) does not equal dead people (killed seemingly at random.)
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
More to the point, fetuses terminated by choice has nothing to do with killing babies by choice.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Actually, yes it does, since they are living human beings when they are destroyed. Just because they're at a stage that is not fully developed doesn't make them less human.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
A child is born. Birth is a line. An important one. A big one. It's the line that seperates you from connecting to the emotional response you're looking for.
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Oh really? Is that your justification to kill children? It's not a child three minutes from passing the cervix, but once it does, it's suddenly a child?

Bullshit, and you know it.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
3 replies
They. Are not. Children.
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Looks like a child to me. Again, just you trying to justify killing children.
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
This is more what the debate is about. If a doctor is terminating at 9 months, it can only be because something is seriously wrong anyway - it's really rare, and not at all what the focus of the argument is on.
[deleted]
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"A child is born. Birth is a line. An important one. A big one. It's the line that seperates you from connecting to the emotional response you're looking for."

You claimed there is a line and birth is that line. This implies that you don't have a problem with aborting a child at 9 months "if there is something seriously wrong." That should not even be an argument, since pretty much all medical emergencies are detected much earlier than 9 months. The scarce few that aren't detected by 9 months, the first thought shouldn't be to abort the child, but to try and save the child. Anyone who thinks the first option is to kill the child is an animal in my mind and has zero morality.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
The line is the unique genetic code that every fetus has, not some arbitrary phase in development since premature babies are saved every day.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
child
/CHīld/
noun
a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.

Are you denying that a living, growing being with a unique human genetic code is not human? How is that possible? It has human DNA, so therefore it is human, so therefore by definition they are children.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
They need to argue semantics to justify killing defenseless little children in the womb.
1 up, 5y
Exactly. First they say it's not human, then we prove them wrong with common sense science, then they say it's not a child, so we prove them wrong with a dictionary, then they say it's not a person because of their "philosophy," which is just code for dehumanization.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
If you have a unique genetic code, you have rights. Including the one to be not ripped to shreds in your mother's womb.
Anyone who favors abortion is a MONSTER.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
I'm not pretending to be a hero. You are pretending not to be a monster. And failing.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
That's certainly very convenient for you seeing as only about 33% of the population are anti-abortion on a good day for you. That means you get to denounce upwards of two-thirds of society as monsters giving you a very opportune air of self-righteousness.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Make up all the fantasy poll numbers you want, abortion is still the murder of a being with a unique "serial number" embedded in their unique DNA sequence. Your lame ass rhetoric doesn't make you any less the monster.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
Yes it does, and you are no more the hero.
1 up, 5y
Oh look, the ghoul is advocating and arguing for killing babies in the womb again. Never misses a chance!
Matrix Morpheus memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
WHAT IF I TOLD YOU THE CORONAVIRUS ISN'T AS DEADLY AS ABORTION; BUT NO ONE HIDES IN THEIR HOMES WHEN CHILDREN ARE KILLED