The race is wide open. I’m confused!

I feel oddly indecisive for someone who follows and memes about politics all the time and is dead set against Trump

I liked Buttigieg and thought he’d be extremely electable, but he just dropped out

I think Biden has shown major, major flaws as a candidate, despite his big win in South Carolina

I like Bernie Sanders on a lot of issues, but his age and electability are questionable

Warren seems over and done at this point

Klobuchar is likable and seems electable, but hasn’t gained very much traction

Bloomberg seems strong on paper and I like his gun control/climate change stances, but he got blown up at the debates and hasn’t contested a single race yet. Also: don’t like the idea of two multibillionaires squaring off against each other in November for control of the country

In the end, I’ll “vote blue no matter who“ in the general election, but I’ve just never been this undecided before.

I’ll let you in on a little secret the DNC won’t tell you about... ;)

If only.

Klobuchar & Gabbard 2020. (Tulsi is younger, so she can VP now (if they were to win) and run for Pres after)!

I have a feeling Gabbard will switch to the GOP by 2024 though because the DNC wanna be pricks.

I still know practically nothing about Klobuchar, admittedly. I know she’s a senator from Minnesota and she’s more of a moderate, but that’s pretty much all. The media only seems to talk Bernie, Bloomberg, and Biden. I’m still surprised Buttigieg got as much traction as he did and still dropped out.

I doubt Tulsi would do a party switch, she’s a bit further left than most Republicans are. However, it’s happened before, like with Jeff Van Drew. I certainly would be willing to welcome Tulsi into the GOP as would many of the more moderate conservatives would.

Surprised by Buttigieg exiting also. I figure now with Klobuchar leaving, they did it for the sake of not diverting voters from Biden while Sanders reaps the benefit of that.

Tulsi switching was just a hunch which came with her voting "Present" during the impeachment. Add to that the party sidelining her and Hillzy sticking her big yap in, plus many Republicans liking her, seems like a good tactical move.

She also infamously ate salad with a comb and is apparently a nightmare of a boss

And I guess that’s pretty much all you’ll ever need to know about her

The “moderate” lane seems to be clearing up all of a sudden, to Biden’s and Bloomberg’s benefit

They both have pretty glaring downsides so that is disappointing, but push come to shove I’d favor Bloomberg (Biden is at the absolute bottom of my list)

It’s a hard call between Biden or Bloomberg. Bloomberg is an oligarch trying to buy his way into the White House who goes way too far with taking away personal freedoms and doesn’t offer much benefit in return. Biden is just going senile. Thankfully we got my boy Trump to vote for, and that’s where my vote is going in November.

The least liberal candidates of the whole bunch. Klobuchar? Maybe. Gabbard? Hell to the no. An impulsive hothead who voted “present” on impeachment and filed a doomed lawsuit against HRC in the middle of impeachment week

There’s a reason practically no one voted for her

That reason is probably the fact that she, like, Trump, is against sending more troops to the Middle East. She, having served, realizes the futility of funneling in more troops and treasure into neverending M.E. conflicts.
The Dems want us embroiled in Syria and Gabbard won't go along.

Some Democrats (and Republicans) wanted heavier involvement in Syria, but Obama mostly refused, keeping it a limited mission targeted only against ISIS

Remember how everyone squawked at Obama for failing to enforce his “red line”?

Trump is the only one who actually fired missiles against the Syrian government after the chemical weapons attacks. And he was loudly praised for it, but went no further.

That is what is called a "measured response". I
Trump is "Damned if he does, and damned if he don't" when it comes to these things with you guys.
For example: He curtails flights from China weeks ago and is roundly criticized as being a "xenophobe" and a, you guessed it..."RACIST".
Now, as the epidemic becomes pandemic you clowns declare this is another "Trump's Katrina moment" or some such nonsense.

but Obama was refused by Congress*

Ahh yes, an underused one lane landing strip which the Russians using it were told in advanced to vacate before it got bombed.

So, are you saying that you are disappointed that we didn't kill a bunch of Russians? Perhaps you are disappointed that we didn't escalate the violence and send a couple divisions of Marines into harms way over a squabble we really have no business in? Just curious...
BTW... there still isn't any consensus on just who actually initiated the gas attack. Some say it was the Syrian AF, others say it was the Syrian rebel insurgents.

Eh, what difference, at this point, does it make?

Ahh, permit me to clarify,
What I said was:

"Ahh yes, an underused one lane landing strip which the Russians using it were told in advanced to vacate before it got bombed."

oops, typo. advance*
Now it should make sense.

You were clear. I knew what you said. My response above stands.

Well like I just told this guy:

imgflip.com/i/3r3nbt?nerp=1583203028#com4206355

This site, I swear.

You never actually ever really answer questions, do you? You're intellectually limited to snarky gibberish & repititous quotation of your own worthless drivel.

Looks like I touched a nerve.

You didn't ask a question, you silly dolt, you just lied and claimed I said a bunch of rubbish that I did not, or does your senile mind require me to repost what I DID say yet again?

Really, how did you get from empty airstrip to WWIII?

What are you on? I never mentioned wwIII or airstrip. You are incapable of having a normal conversation.
Crack is whack...just say No!

Least libewah? I don't play tee shirt politics.

As for Gabbard, what you're saying is she does as SHE chooses, not what the DNC machine intructs her to?
For the programmed mechanoids, I can see why that's a problem.
For those who know the bs is bs, she's awesome.

Boo hoo for Hillarat. SHE'S the reason why her friend Trump got elected, and look at that, she's trying to help him win again.
Go figure.

Tulsi does, indeed, what she chooses: and what she chooses, mainly, is to whine at the DNC and Hillary, and occasionally offer welcome remarks against “forever wars”

Not enough to get voters excited this time I guess

(But of course, her failure is a self-fulfilling prophecy of the vast DNC conspiracy against her)

You are aware what libel is, Mr Kylie AttorNeigh (see what I did there)?

It could be, but probably not

Tulsi is a politician and HRC made a political, albeit false, statement

Pretty much just like everyone else does in this day and age

Allowing politicians to sue political rivals for libel/slander is a troubling path to go down

shhhhhh,,,,,

lying not good, mkay?

What kind of liability would your theory open up on Trump, I wonder

Wha? H-I-L-L-A-R-Y C-L-I-N-T-O-N

How is it that everyone on this site acts like an illiterate yet are capable of typing a response to something they just read?

haha, now my turn:
What kind of liability would your theory open up on Netanyahu?

This is fun.

I don’t know Israeli libel law

She’s nowhere in the polls tho

She didn’t get anywhere near the point that the DNC could have put their thumb on the scale

You have to have some real voters first and I guess Democrats just don’t like her

that is what I said.

I recommend anyone except Bernie. Yes I don't think any are fit, but Bernie is my least favorite. But it's your choice.

I'd like to pitch them all...
...pitch them all over board.