Well done, Nancy...

Yeah I think you better go read your link again. Your reading comprehension is not what I expected.

Nowhere does it try claim a Landslide for anyone and it specifically reports that a lower percentage of eligible Democrat voters turned up than last time round. 26% as opposed to 29% in 2016.

So at this point in time you can conclude that a near 140% higher voter turnout for Trump in New Hampshire over the 2012 incumbents numbers and then although there was a higher number of registered voters which were spread over so many candidates a 3% overall decline in eligible voters for Democrat Candidates was recorded.

So the more probable scenario is it being not what you want.
However, To argue what any of this early voting really means would be pointless it is still too early to tell what momentum there is. And of course the total number of Democrats who go vote in primaries is going to be a bigger number as they have so many candidates to spread votes over.
Sounds about correct doesn't it.

Always projection with you guys.

Still holding on to that last bit of hope, huh? Bless your heart.

I'll be fine either way. I make enough money that I don't mind the tax increase I got under trump and probably will under a Dem. Either way...I am ok. I watch politics like a sport. I am also very interested in science and history, that is....getting to the truth. I can set aside bias because again....I do well under dem or rep. But I do have empathy having grown up in a lower working class family I know the struggles. Also I can easily recognize stupidity and plain old evil from that unbiased standpoint.

"But I do have empathy having grown up in a lower working class family I know the struggles."

If you truly do, then you wouldn't champion for socialism and the Dems.

I am not a champion for "socialism" - I am a champion for fair and equitable capitalism in a democratic/republic governed society. What we have now is a Socialist Corporatocracy leaning towards Plutocracy. The less-than-wealthy are brainwashed to think they need to protect their overlords. It's neo-feudalism except it's lower sorts are willing participants.

No worries your understood now.

By your link it was assumed that something there was aiding your case when completely the oposite is contained.

I Still stand by the fact that it's too early to believe anything can be reliably extrapolated by 2 Primary votes being held.
But Clearly you hold there is. The record vote you point too is only a record vote when concieved as a larger number but if it equates to a 3 % lower number of eligible voters. I would be worried if I were a Dem.
It's not like you guys like to use straight facts now is it.

Trump getting 140% higher votes than the last encumbent is comparing Apples with Apples.
Your number set is Apples and Oranges and therefore doesnt unequivocally support your claim as 3% less eligible voters are voting.

I think your correct if he doesn't win or lose naturally their will be martial law called except he wont stay as a permanent dictator (come on now your ilk would love to have your own dictator but first you'll need a candidate worth voting in) it will be a purge of the Traitors whatever their colors or affiliations.

Me and my Ilk don’t want a dictator. Lol that’s anti American!

Good, I dont think anyone really does either.

Are you actually one of those DIMocrats that thinks NH having more DIMocrat voters than republicans means anything for the general election.

Okay Stanley, it is you, right? Nobody else could be that dim.

Stanley, as a high info voter, I'm sure you know that Trump's rallies are pulling in huuuuuge numbers of independents and even democrats that didn't vote in the last general election, or voted for HRC. Those voters, combined with the republican effort to get out the vote (because as I'm sure even you know, many republicans didn't vote for Trump in 2016) and register new voters, are all solid indicators that a Trump landslide is a possibility.

However, your DIM party has some problems. Their front-runner is a socialist, and the DNC clearly wants nothing to do with him as their candidate again, just as they didn't in 2016.

Are you seriously going to believe that Bernie's supporters will go out and vote for Amy K, instead of writing in Bernie, after taking it in the shorts twice from the Dimocrat party? Most don't even identify as Dimocrats. And you do respect how people identify, don't you Stanley?

So, my take is that as is often the case with delusional progressives, you just feel it in your heart that Trump is such a horrible human being, that people, even Bernie supporters, will vote for anyone if it means a chance to beat the orange man. In my case, I just read the room and make predictions about possibilities. I'm not so delusional, or so overly self confident to believe I'm right and you're wrong, and that you're an idiot for believing what you believe. Even though you clearly think that about all Trump supporters.

I don't even have to look at your link, ANONYMOUS, because you clearly missed the point of my post. Granted, it wasn't spelled out for the challenged among us, so in hindsight I can see why you had some difficulty.

btw, if you don't have the "courage" to use your actual imgflip login, your comment is worthless, imo. For all I know, you could be StanHalen... which would explain why you don't want to use your actual login.

At the time of my post yesterday, Trump was around 130K total votes. The image attached shows, and as even you should be able to see, Trump's vote count in the NH primary are substantially higher than other recent incumbents.

So the reason the 130K votes for Trump are significant, relative to the other incumbents, is that they all won their general election bids after having received far fewer votes than Trump. While this doesn't guarantee anything, not even a win, it sure points in the direction of a landslide victory for Trump in the 2020 general election.

Incumbents don't get that much representation in states where they run unopposed...I mean, what's the point of getting out to vote for one person? Look at Obama's numbers in 2012...and the other's. If Trump only lost New Hampshire by 2200 votes +/- in 2016, then more than doubling his votes in the primary shows that he's picked up a lot of support in this state. A. Lot. More. Support.