Imgflip Logo Icon

The two faces of the Democrats. If not for double standards, they would have none at all

The two faces of the Democrats.  If not for double standards, they would have none at all |  THE DEFENSE IS NOT ENTITLED TO PRESENT WITNESSES OR EVIDENCE; IT IS OUTRAGEOUS TO HAVE A TRIAL WITHOUT WITNESSES OR EVIDENCE! | image tagged in democrats,double standards,impeach | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
6,050 views 67 upvotes Made by TodaysReality 11 months ago in politics
Add Meme
Add Image
Post Comment
Best first
13 Comments
reply
4 ups, 10m,
1 reply
double palm | SERIOUSLY THOUGH | image tagged in double palm | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 10m
Chuck and Nancy | THIS IS OUR DICHOTOMY | image tagged in chuck and nancy | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 11m
Leslie Nielsen Contemplates | CONGRESSMAN JEFF VAN DREW, YEAH, CONGRESSMAN JEFF VAN DREW NOW THERE'S A GOOD DEMOCRAT. I'M SURE THERE'S A GOOD DEMOCRAT SOMEWHERE, LIKE AH. | image tagged in leslie nielsen | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
2 ups, 10m
Most Outrageously Lying Meme Award. it's all yours, bro ( :
reply
2 ups, 10m
The defense WAS allowed to call witnesses and present evidence in the house investigation.
reply
3 ups, 11m,
1 reply
reply
6 ups, 11m,
1 reply
That hot how trials work. If the prosecution fails like that, the case get dismissed and if it is without prejudice, they can start over and try again.
reply
5 ups, 11m,
2 replies
Impeachment is not truly analogous to a criminal trial.

If Trump is in the position of criminal defendant, then he’s been able to exercise a huge amount of control over what documents and witnesses the prosecution has been able to collect.

If the “prosecution” has failed so far (and I don’t think they have), that’s a big reason why.

Whatever your feelings on Trump’s guilt or innocence, we need to get this right procedurally because otherwise, the precedent coming out of this will be essentially that executive privilege can be invoked at every turn to thwart congressional oversight of the President.
reply
1 up, 10m
No, the House was to impatient to go through the normal legal process to get the information they want and get a court ruling on whether executive privilege applies. You want to set the precedent that Congress interprets the law, when that duty is the domain of the court system and a dangerous idea in its own right.

And that failure to complete the investigation and asking the court to do the House's work for them is a basic failure, without which, you would have the evidence you want and thus no reason to complain.

So I conclude that you complainant is not really about not getting this procedurally right, but not getting the predetermined outcome wanted from the process.
reply
5 ups, 10m,
1 reply
You will never be able to make a Trump Cult member grasp how utterly wrong they are and how this event will erode The Constitution even further than it has been over the decades.

Are the Democrats Trust worthy? Of course not. Neither are Republicans.

But Trump Supporters? They have become an Enemy of America like I never expected to witness

They have put a single sub human pos above America

They have become so Anti Constitution and law they think it's actually funny that Trump is blatantly obstructing and abusing his power.
reply
0 ups, 10m
That is the very difference between the house and Senate. It's been that way over 200yrs.
reply
0 ups, 11m
One is an investigation, the other a trial. That's the difference.

In a police investigation, those under investigation don't get to say how the investigation goes. The defense has the trial for that.
Flip Settings
memes
gifs
other
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • 963F511E-7BBF-4620-A2D1-CA56406BDE2E.jpeg
  • E8CA3BCE-DBB5-40DF-BDFD-91FC46CCEDF7.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    THE DEFENSE IS NOT ENTITLED TO PRESENT WITNESSES OR EVIDENCE; IT IS OUTRAGEOUS TO HAVE A TRIAL WITHOUT WITNESSES OR EVIDENCE!
    hotkeys: D = random, W = upvote, S = downvote, A = back
    Feedback