When fake propaganda meets reality.

[image deleted]

Replacing???? What do say now?

They just add 10 years each time .... been going on since the 1980's

I'm not questioning the falseness of the propaganda nor the legitimacy of the meme. Just observing the causal redundancy. :)

All the "failed predictions" in the world don't disprove the basic theory of anthropogenic global warming. 3mmt57.jpg (click to show)

The basic theory along with much of the underlying evidence is succinctly explained here by no less an authority than NASA. https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Specific predictions of what exactly will happen, where, and when in a warming world are very difficult in an environment as large and variable as the earth.

That's why it's all the more remarkable that some specific predictions have been right on the money including this Australian wildfire season. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24532643-500-australian-government-report-predicted-severe-wildfires-11-years-ago/

The wildfires were started by people from what I have seen. Also improper land management has lead to most fires spreading over thousands of acres. We have that problem here out west. Fires are caused by people and also nature.

Look at the raw data. NASA and NOAA have been “adjusting” the data for decades (always UP) ... and they’re doing it more often and to a greater degree than ever.

Raw data never lies. Politicians and government paid scientists DO.
The funny thing is, NASA and NOAA both publish the raw data so it’s easy to figure out where they are falsifying their numbers.

The earth is not warming according to NASA and NOAA’s raw data ... it’s actually cooling. But sheep believe the adjusted numbers without questioning anything then trot out a figure that 98% of scientists agree ... blah blah blah.

Raw. Data. Doesn’t. Lie.

Big if true. I’ve heard this claimed before, and if this were actually proven up I’d be very interested, but so far I just haven’t seen it.

I have seen cherry-picked stuff, like a study referenced on NASA’s website that showed certain Antarctic ice sheets actually grew in recent years (though when you read past the headline, the study stopped far short of saying this was evidence that global warming was false, and the lead author actually said he expected the ice to reverse and start melting relatively soon)

Save for a section of western Antartica (round the Ross Ice Shelf) which has been losing ice, the rest of Antartica has witnessed record low temps and thickening of ice. Not some ice shelf that fluctuates with the seasons, but THE glacier that covers the ENTIRE continent.

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!
That much celebrated Ross Ice Shelf has melted so such that bones left in elephant seal breeding grounds from 250 years ago have been exposed further up the inlet away from the ocean. Elephant seals breed on ice free shores, so this is indication that 250ya that area used to be ice free, and thus was WARMER than it is today.

Coulda sworn I told you this already?
Looks like your cherry picker is functioning just fine despite the extra sweat.

"...your cherry picker is functioning just fine....." that's a line to remember, a line to repeat 😂

Thanks, I have my moments.

You can easily look up the data yourself. It’s all on government websites.
Look up Tony Heller on YouTube.

[image deleted]

[image deleted] Sorry for the misunderstanding I do see how.