my only claim was that shapiro is a shill and rhetorician.
is it your contention that shapiro does not engage in a specific rhetorical style to espouse an extremely partisan viewpoint that appeals to a specific demographic?
because he does,and he is quite good at it I might add,and well compensated by think tanks,super pacs and billionaires.
which would make him a...……?
that's right!
a shill!
would you be happier if I simply stated that shapiro is a fantastic rhetorician that gained notoriety by "destroying" scared and nervous college students on youtube.and has built quite a following with his fast paced and laser focused verbosity that targets and "triggers the libs" ,which has garnered him a very loyal (and defensive it appears) following?
just like:
sargon of Akkad,thunderfoot,stefan molyneaux,,Rachel maddow,chris hayes,chuck todd,.
all shills.
is it the word that so offends thee my lord?
shall we change it for something more soothing to thine ear?
how about "well compensated opinion maker"?
would that ease thy lords ruffle sensibilities?