Hypocrisy much?! (MSM and Democrats)

No. Just because you inferred it, does not mean the OP implied it.

I already explained that. Please read my comments.

Is hypocrisy a big word for you? It means what the democrats are "trying" to prove, they are guilty of. Doesn't have anything to do with President Trumps guilt or innocence.

You’re right, hypocrisy doesn’t necessarily equal mutual guilt. Unfortunately, the only difference is when caught; both Obama and Trump denied awareness of these transactions as none were directly contributed.

However, only Trump was caught with an obvious quid pro quo by his own words with Ukraine.

Ahhhh, negative. Please quote from the transcript where Trump said that.

I don't have to. Practice what the OP preaches and read it.

Do you believe everything the MSM says? Read the transcript of the call. There is no quid pro quo. Even the Ukranian President said there wasn't. The only thing Trump is guilty of is winning an election he wasn't supposed to. The democrats have spent 3 years trying to get rid of him instead of doing their jobs.

I don’t have to believe MSM. I read the transcript.

Do you believe everything Trump says? Read the transcript of the call. There was quid pro quo. The Ukrainian President, of course, denied there was because it would go directly against the interests of his country. He needs those weapons to defend themselves against a potential Russian invasion. His account is unreliable and unnecessary thanks to the transcript. And Trump did win the election. Don’t submit to Democratic propaganda and say that the Electoral College “doesn’t count”. The Democrats have been doing their job for three years, that’s why they managed to grab the house. And they’ve spent a majority of that time submitting bills rather than perusing impeachment.

Then read it again. This time, objectively.

I did. Quid pro quo.

There is NOT quid pro quo in the transcript of the call. Quid pro quo is what Biden did to take suspicion off of the company that hired his son. That is quid pro quo.

Yes, they were both quid pro quo. The difference is one was done at the request of the US government while the other was done only to serve personal interest. You would have a hard time proving that Biden explicitly abused his power to do so, let alone enough to open an investigation. Unlike Trump, which his transcript alone was enough to merit investigation since it was an obvious abuse of his executive powers.

Biden bragged about it. Have you not seen this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBGKEfcj76Q

If you're getting your news from MSM, then probably not. They haven't really played it, except maybe on Fox.

Trump didn't withhold or threaten to withhold anything. Just suggested Ukraine should take a look at Biden...which they should.

Yes, Biden bragged about his diplomatic ability to remove a prosecutor that the US government deemed the prosecutor a threat, rather than a boon, to Ukraine's campaign to end corruption.

I'm not getting my news from any single source. I read the transcript myself and formed my own opinion. I also validated that opinion through English and Legal degrees, of which I know a fair few. Most who voted for Donald Trump. Because I live in the south. And they agree. Quid pro quo? Most definitely.

I'm afraid he did. Trump called Ukraine and Trump himself stressed the importance of his support to Ukraine considering the lack of support Ukraine is receiving from it's other allies. The President of Ukraine, knowing how much Trump values loyalty, then boasted of the Trump and his many triumphs before imploring him that US support was necessary. Then Trump asked the President to do him a favor to look into the Bidens. Quid pro quo.

So...what did the President get out of that exchange?! He suggested the President of Ukraine look at the Bidens. No threat to withhold anything if he didn't. All of the talk about how the US supports Ukraine was never even implied as a threat to without that support if Biden wasn't looked into. As the President says "Perfect phone call. Perfect"

Yes, you probably shouldn't get your news source directly from Trump. You cannot have an objective opinion if you solely rely on a suspect to tell the truth.

through PEOPLE WITH* English and Legal degrees---

Also, the democrats job is not to try and impeach the sitting president. It's to tackle the issues that mean the most to the American people, you know like taxes, border security, the crumbling infrastructure, prison reform, trade inequities with foreign governments, removing regulations and other impediments to doing business in America, bringing companies back to America, creating jobs, improving the economy, etc...Wait a sec, that IS what President Trump is doing and the Dems are fighting him every step of the way.

No, it is not the job of Democrats to try and impeach the sitting president. It's the House of Representatives, of which those Democrats occupy a majority. And it is certainly within their power to determine if Trump abused his power or not. Whether or not Trump is doing a "good job" doesn't absolve him of abusing of power.

He is not abusing his power. So working 3 years and stopping at nothing to try and remove him just seems petty and small, which most of the Democrats in the House are.

If you read the transcript then you would know that Trump did abuse his power. It is also ludicrous to suggest that all Democrats have only tried removing Trump from power. Many disagreed with impeachment simply for being an "unpopular" approach to remove him. While yes, it is unpopular to impeach a sitting President, it is certainly their civic duty to do so as it would be a gross oversight on their part to ignore the evidence produced before them. Trump is abusing his power. Read the transcript.

What the Democrats are doing to try and unseat him is an abuse of power. Trump is not abusing his power. And every Democratic member in the house save 2 voted for impeachment so...pretty much every one. Give me one instance of the President abusing his power. One.

Read the transcript.