Brian Camenker was right. The homosexual agenda will only grow stronger and more dangerous unless we put an end to this ASAP.

Yep pedophilia is huge part of LGBTQ

please tell me this is sarcastic

Nope

aight. evidence where pedophilia is part of lgbtq pls

well, it's plainly obvious. it's not a story the libtards would tell you. you see, back in the good old days, gay marriage was a big taboo, as it rightfully should be. but the libtards decided to come up with their ultimate master plan. that was to make all unusual sexualities and whatnot normalized. and mark my words. soon, the libtarded elite will be having pedophilia and zoophilia normalized. 😠😠😠

when we make america great again, i want all gays to be sent to insane asylums and have "homosexuality" renamed to "homophilia". who's with me?!?!?! ✊😣

Back in my day, you could get imprisoned for being gay.
Because LIBERTY AND FREEDOM!

What you cant see the evidence with your own observation. You need someone to spell it out.

Just think about that pedophile who molests the same sex, What are they? Straight?

Homosexuality and pedophilia are not exclusive of each other but are clearly entwined.

The case for pedophilia and homosexuality has been pushed out of the conversation. By labelling those who would talk about it as homophobic when maybe it's something like pedophobic that they are and thats a goods thing. Why shouldnt everyone be pedophobic? Oh that's right because the perverted minds believe sex with children is good for children.

But you're not showing proof. You're just stating stuff.

Okay well sorry thats about all i have time for.

But if you can answer the first question ("Just think about that pedophile who molests the same sex, What are they? Straight?") with a reality based answer then the rest falls in to place.

I have provided proofs,( (pro͞of) n. 1. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true. 2. a. The validation of a proposition by application of specified rules, as of induction or deduction, to assumptions, axioms, and sequentially derived conclusions. b. A statement or argument used in such ...
However, they are obviously just not compelling enough for your mind to accept. No problem.

So can you then tell me why what i wrote is not substantiating of the statement that" pedophilia and homosexuality are interlinked"
Men or Women preying on underaged persons of the same sex is pedophilia and homosexuality. And thats not part of the rainbow?

So, all paedophiles are gay by your logic. Does it really matter? A homosexual paedophile is still a paedophile. A heterosexual paedophile is still a paedophile. And it being part of LGBTQ+? That's the narrative BOOMERS like you push even though it's definitely not a majority.

No they are not all gay, you got the first part mixed up, see earlier post "pedophile who molests the same sex"
Second and third part agreed, and as to it being part of LGBTQ+?. Let's agree to disagree, there are plenty of homosexuals who are pushing the lowering of consent ages etc. and promoting a normalcy for sex with children.
Unfortunately for those LGBTQ+? who dont have any inclination or want anything to do with pedophilia, the ones who do want it will corrupt the rest of it. They are trying it now.

And I'm 20 years too young to be a boomer.

"And I'm 20 years too young to be a boomer."
boomer is a mindset

"Okay well sorry thats about all i have time for."
epic excuse for making feelings instead of facts

So you disagree, no problem

Oh its you waffles, still waffling.

lmao conservapedia again

Children would quite literally rather kill themselves than face shock therapy for "conversion". I am against dead children. Shock therapy is barbaric, does not work, and should be banned.

>against dead children
>pro abortion

Pick one

eyyy red herring

Right? And homosexuals adopt children when straight couples don't want them - and yet there it is in the OP, anti-abortion while being against the adoption of children at the same time.

And I'm the one being asked to pick a lane?

true that

lol there's PLENTY of straight people that would love to adopt children and do. Way more than gays, which makes sense as gays are like 3% of the population.

Btw, the group that has the highest rate of abuse on adopted kids are lesbians.

But having said all that, I was mostly tweaking you, altho a fetus being ripped apart is barbaric as well.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Ex-homosexuals

It does work. Also, why ban something that the subjects are willingly taking part in?

i love the siting of a site that uses the term "cafeteria christians" to describe level-headed people

Again, the suicide rate on that is ridiculous. Why on Earth would something that participants would rather kill themselves than do be considered voluntary? And how is it something that works if participants turn up dead?

'Why on Earth would something that participants would rather kill themselves than do be considered voluntary?'

Because they choose to show up. And the reason there is a suicide rate is because queers are mentally unstable.

The reason there's a suicide rate is because it's basically torture and they're just children.

Is it as high as the suicide rate of transgenders, before and after surgery? I've never heard the stats on it.

"I've never heard the stats on it."

it's not commonly talked about on the NY Post, surprise surprise.

Don't give me the boomer treatment. Why not give ma an answer rather then a pithy comment?

*me

lmao. the "boomer treatment". aight.

here's one article about its link to the infamous 41 number.
https://www.newsweek.com/gender-identity-conversion-therapy-suicide-transgender-discrimination-hate-1458488

this one is from a site fight LGBTQ youth suicide.
https://www.thetrevorproject.org/get-involved/trevor-advocacy/50-bills-50-states/about-conversion-therapy/

this one says some specific higher chance rates. site might be broken, but i read "95%" from one bit.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/201811/gay-conversion-therapy-associated-suicide-risk

But which one is it, glib, or seriously offended?
Wanna play silly clown, go for yours. But a little consistency within the same meme would be kinda totes - is that the milli word, totes - kool, eeeeyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyayaaiii?

https://giphy.com/gifs/request-donald-wrong-hPPx8yk3Bmqys

eyy you're gonna need a lot more than a basic gif to refute that

Actually, that's all I need to refute your basic 'argument'.

now gifs can be used to defend electrocuting children?

Do you think there's an issue when the people pushing abortion are making money of off it, besides just using stem cells and organs instead of wasting them?

very much so. when you want to make money off of something, you want it to happen lots. i discourage abortion.. you can see the incompatibilities there

'i don't defend abortion. i discourage it, honestly. where'd you get that i support crushing dead babies?'

Then I assume that this comment was sarcastic and satirical: https://imgflip.com/i/3fawcp?nerp=1573014337#com3718642

sort of satirical. i don't support crushing dead babies. i was trying to say there that it'd be better to use the organs for medical use rather than waste the obtained matter. notice in the title of the video you screencapped that the word "crushing" is in quotes

That is a lot of talk from someone who defends abortion and crushing dead babies.

i don't defend abortion. i discourage it, honestly. where'd you get that i support crushing dead babies?

If you replace 'torture' with 'therapy', then your statement is correct.

It is not torture. The participants are willingly taking part in practices that have been proven to be effective.

'Willing participation does not mean it isn't torture. Masochism is evidence enough of that.'

But masochism does not mean it is torture.

'Again with the "proven" language. Show the proof.'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maBBfiYW-C4

https://www.conservapedia.com/Conversion_therapy#Ex-homosexuals:_Religiously_mediated_change_in_homosexuals_vs._reparative_therapy

https://www.conservapedia.com/Ex-homosexuals

Just because a homosexual could pretend to be cured, which is unlikely because the therapists should be able to notice that their participant has not been cured, does not mean that all ex-homosexuals are pretenders. Homosexuality is unnatural, and nobody is born that way. Homosexuality is something that some people can develop, so it can be cured.

Okay

'I won't take your word for it'

Pity.

'I see. So you know this from personal experience, then'

I know this from online research and study of conversion and reparative therapy.

No. The experts are the therapists themselves.