"You Know You're A Redneck If You Like Trump Because..."

Another shining example of your twisted bigotry and ever expanding self righteous ego. Yeah smart guy, keep believing that this picture in ANY WAY represents 'trump supporters'. You should seek professional guidance for help in dealing with the severe case of TDS you're suffering from. BTW genius, your pathetic attempt at a Foxworthy rip off joke is a double negative. Go back to school, child.

Why do you look down on those people?

Hey buddy! It's been a minute! You must be using an Alt these days? Now, I'm fairly certain you ask your question tongue-in-cheek, so I'll just grin and say, touche. Archy routinely posts pictures of what he calls "rednecks" diving into pools of mud and refers to them as "trump supporters". (which makes me question his browsing interests, to each their own I guess) Anyhow, you and I both know that this is due to his incredibly evident disdain for anyone who doesn't live, dress, speak, and act like him and his neighbors, in the "big city". The elitist ego is strong with this one. You're familiar with it, I can remember calling out your own bias against people living in "pig slop Arkansas". Hope all is well, happy instigating g-man!

Um, who are you again?

And ya ain't answered the question, guy, WHY do you look down on those people, ya racist?

Actually it's been a week, then now 15hrs with your reply.

Are you too confused?

In the above photograph, how many people do you suppose voted for Hillary?

And how many voted for Trump?

And, what is the political affiliation of this guy? http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2016/07/reprise-flabbergasting-stupidity-of.html

C'mon. Take a wild stab.

Concerning your presumption that "this picture" does not "in ANY WAY represents "Trump supporters"... here is some information to help you apply logic properly.

Reprise: "Most Stupid People Are Conservative," John Stuart Mill
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2018/11/reprise-most-stupid-people-are.html

By way of summary:

"Trumpism: The Rebellion Of Know Nothing Twits"
https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2019/10/trumpism-rebellion-by-dimwit-know.html

So you, genius that you seem to be passing yourself off as, believe that any article titled ""Most Stupid People Are Conservative" is in any way objective about anything?

You do care about the truth and facts, right?

And btw, I don't like conservatives any more than you seem to, so don't try to insult me by saying I am one. The only thing equally as insulting would be to call me a liberal, or worse, a progressive.

Did you read the article "Most Stupid People?"

Or are you too busy "just making things up" to participate in historical and cultural contextualization?

Reprise: "Most Stupid People Are Conservative," John Stuart Mill
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2018/11/reprise-most-stupid-people-are.html

By default, anyone whose greatest perceived insult is to be called "liberal" or "progressive" is essentially conservative.

The fact that an individual does not like to be pigeon-holed doesn't mean that s/he's off the political spectrum altogether.

I also recommend you bone up on "The Dunning Kruger Hypothesis."

"Mark Twain, Adolf Hitler And The Dunning-Kruger Effect"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2016/01/mark-twain-and-dunning-kruger-effect.html

Stupidity has nothing to do with race.

Does it ever occur to right-wingers to defend arguments and provide supporting documentation?

Or is all about "feelings" and how "the loins" move?

I'm citing well-collated, pertinent information.

And I'm sharing it.

If you read what I'd write, you'd find a wealth of well-documented information.

What are your information sources?

Trump, a fellow fast approaching 14,000 documented lies since Inauguration Day?

QAnon, which would have us believe John Kennedy Jr. is a alive, well and a Trump supporter?

WTF!

Beyond the partisan rhetoric and its singleminded obsession to "seize power" at any cost, are contemporary conservatives so far gone that they don't even know how to play by the rules of intellectual integrity - don't even realize it is necessary to accept truth from whatever quarter it comes?

I have no problem cheering Truth-Tellers whoever they are.

"I Applaud Donald Trump"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2019/05/i-applaud-donald-trump.html

"Spot-On Truth-Teller Donald Trump: The Most Important Thing Said At The Republican Debate"
https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/12/spot-on-honest-donald-trump-most.html

You guys cannot applaud the truth wherever you find it.

You always have a prior obligation to make sure truth alligns with conservative dogma.

You cannot - ever - praise Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama because your world view depends on total demonization of "the other" and so you must never let up: you must be categorically opposed to the demons simply because you assume they're DAMNABLE.

It couldn't be that life is a mixed bag and sometimes people get things right, and sometimes people get things wrong.

You have to be like inerrant God on his judgmental throne - sending people to eternal bliss... or eternal damnation.

There's never a shade of grey.

And so Hillary is NEVER right... but "I Applaud Donald Trump."

At least ask yourself the following question.

"If I can unabashedly praise Trump when he hits the nail on the head, why can't you do the same from your side of the aisle?"

It is not hard. You just have to honor Truth - and be honest.

But then you would have to acknowledge this insight:

Republican presidential candidate, Pat Buchanan, the living American who has served longest as a White House senior staff adviser, observed: “The Republican philosophy might be summarized thus: To hell with principle; what matters is power, and that we have it, and that they do not."

"To hell with principle."

Wow.

Republican presidential candidate, Pat Buchanan, the living American who has served longest as a White House senior staff adviser, observed: “The Republican philosophy might be summarized thus: To hell with principle; what matters is power, and that we have it, and that they do not."

"To hell with principle."

Pat Buchanan
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Buchanan

"Dimber1942

Oooo....Vagi's in "multiple reply to a single post" mode, I see.

Your attempts to troll are almost quaint at this point. Keep trying, granny."

That 2nd one was a reply to this morning's comment from you which had no reply option, you drunken senile twit, hence the 3 days diff between my replies and that fact that the 2nd was 'unrelavant' to your comment here, of which this is now the 3rd.

Do you require GPS and crayons to help you figure this out?

Unrealevant?

Ye're so anal, triggerin ya iz almost cruel.

'Tis also frikkin' highlarious.

Have yourself a noice noight.
I know I will

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

at your expense.

That's it, Crybaby Dimby, dodge away with your "unrelevent" drivel what your limitations can't allow you to address otherwise. As long as you wrap it in smug, no one will notice that you have absolutely nothing to say, as always.