When you need a bench of "whistleblowers"

The whistleblower reports are parts of the constitutional process, if the report had no evidence, IT WOULDN'T BE POPULAR RIGHT NOW. The inspector general declared the report arguable, and that the whistleblower was a member of an intelligence agency, the government transcripts of the call undoubtedly contained pure evidence that our "Best President" had obstructed justice. Trump does not know when to shut up and will pull as many shady moves as he can just to win an election and plague the American population.

I've read the transcripts, and it's pretty clear that whatever's there is pretty far from "pure evidence." A person can read into the report what he wants.

Says the person who isn't an Inspector General

I mean the transcript was made public...