libtards can't argue with this one xDDDD

Da media sez she's cool!!!! XDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!

technically the media hate her as well. the media are being given stocks from the oil industry, and don't have anything against her apart from ad hominem attacks, which is where IMGflip gets its caliber.

How so, when the billionaires that back Greta, own most of the media.

"back"

sure. you do know the majority of media outlets have share stocks with the oil industry, right?

Pharmaceutical companies too. Both of which are controlled by the same groups of billionaire monopoly families, that own the majority of media world-wide, which also control Greta. Let me know when you can add something new that I don't know. I can add in more information that you don't know, if you have any confusion about anything though.

"Let me know when you can add something new that I don't know. "

Greta has access to the internet

So? That doesn't explain the amount of money she gains from being a ONE Foundation member, the media skyrocketing her to "stardom". There's plenty of other better versed and well-spoken environmentalists and vegans, that could give more compelling speeches. They're using her to push agendas because they're related to her. Her mother's side Thunberg is connected to Weishaupt by her father. The could've picked billions of other people, why her? You would have never figured out any of this, without me. You're welcome.

Weishaupt was the illuminatti guy, right?

Adam Weishaupt. Correct. Thank god someone knows something about something.

I always thought it was weird with all the presidents being related or the Mormons in the space program.

I concur that was very weird, the symbolism of the NASA astronauts. Mormons, and Freemasons, Luciferians, Satanists, and many more working together. They've really f**ked our chances at having a free nation, in the U.S. I hope we do out those f**kers and advance where we are supposed to be with technologies, some day.

there is such thing as need and excess you know

Which you have no claim to make unless you can prove definitively that plant-food somehow kills plants.

In before the debunked study of rice fields that were used over and over with no crop rotation or off-season soil-revitalization.

In before you claim that thin leaves are better than thicker leaves with bigger/better stems for more strength and immune/defense against pests and phytochemical and nutrient transport from better photosynthesis.

But please do try to prove your claim.

it's not CO2 that kills plants. It's CO2 that heats up, melts ice, and drowns the earth.

Showing your lack of intelligence. Showing your abundance of non-critical-thinking preprogramming. Saying the same NPC stuff. Why is it so many people like you just don't understand science? ANYWAY haha Let me break it down to a level you can understand.

Nature makes rain to cool the Earth, when the temperature rises, the oceans' top millimeters, start to evaporate into the atmosphere, and then as moisture cools, while going up into the atmosphere, they condense, depending on how cool the high-altitude is, they make either rain, ice, or snow.

As the droplets/ice/snow fall, they're also compressed and cooled due to the speed at which they fall, back down to the Earth, and sometimes freeze depending on how cool the air is below them, via the jet-streams and the current atmospheric pressure.

So if at all anything, the heat causes rain, which then drops on to land, creates aquifers, and so even if the Earth warms, the oceans don't rise.

FREAKING. EPIC.