You shall seek asylum...elsewhere...

Supreme Court allows broad enforcement of asylum limits

https://apnews.com/a817cf3affb04f3d8ad3c4940366a5fe

https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEEWhug3VHNKEyd2zY3OaAiIqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowvIaCCzDnxf4CMP2F8gU?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

The very first paragraph in your own image capture proves you wrong. Also the second paragraph of your second capture below also proves you wrong, but you ignored that as well.

But thanks for going through the extra step of providing evidence that you're wrong, and ignoring the parts you do not like.

Wrong, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/16/2019-15246/asylum-eligibility-and-procedural-modifications
Still not what the SCOTUS even ruled on.,

LOL, the actual legal restrictions to asylum themselves. But nice insults in the place of facts.,Face it, even your own sources you quotes prove you wrong.

It isn't nonsense, I posted the original source, the actual legal restrictions to asylum as they are written under the law. As it is your meme is factually incorrect at best.

So why are all the major US newspaper and news television stations reporting that the supreme court overturned the lower court's ruling? So you are saying they are lying? Immigrants must now file for asylum in the first country they come to, not walk thru it, and keep going to the US border.

Thus my original meme, they shall not pass the first country they come too. They have to stop and file for asylum there.

Nice red herring, and series of miss-truths.

They're not reporting an overturned ruling. They are reporting and injunction being struck down. The case itself is still pending over the legality of the rule change. And of course that has nothing to do with the point you're refuting.

I haven't said that the media has stated anything wrong, I'm saying that you are. They can apply to asylum in any country that they pass though, and then apply for asylum in the USA if they are turned down.

As the text of the rule change contradicts you talking point with even your own evidence showing you're wrong, I'd be will to say you are willfully ignorant of the basic facts at this point.