first time

I doubt this would do much at all since most of these mass shooters end up suiciding themselves in the end. They aren't thinking bout whether or not they'll get the death penalty. What we need to do is implement more mental health programs and stop encouraging mental disabilities.

"How do we stop encouraging mental disabilities, when the society openly encourages mental illness like gender dysphoria and PROSECUTES anyone who speaks up against it...? We now glamorize mental illness, rather than treating it."

This is partially what I was talking about.

Oh, IN PUBLIC, because that's the last thing an attention seeking mass murdering suicidal psycho in search of getting his name etched in the public eye would want in case his aim is that bad to his own head with his gunz?

Getting tired, are you?

Sad.

You never wondered why I delete them so quickly, or do it mostly when you're not about?

Here, have a cookie, Sherlock, you've earned it.

.

^ A simple period posted then deleted is all it takes to trigger you.
And the best part? I can keep doing it and it'll still ruffle your delicate downy feathers.

Thanks for playing.

Scroll up.

That IS what you're replying to, yes?

I left it up longer so you can have a chance to see it, yes?

I deleted it then you replied to that deletion, yes?

This IS your reply to exactly that, yes?

"Timber1972

Now you're just "deleting" to get a reaction. You know it. And now you know I know it.?"

Or is your confusion because you are going senile, yes?

Yeah, it isn't exactly like they're shooting these people because they slowed him down in aisle 4 when he was rushing to buy Twinkies, it's all about acting out and achieving "The Notorious Legend of..." status for their woes.

... and the Facebook and other social media posts, videos, etc which no one thought peculiar till AFTER exept for Lisa Bryerson who the authorities naturally dismissed because whiny butthurt alt righties prats about to start their precious oncoming civil war over, um, some unknown reason are way common.

Seriously agree here. While we do need to remedy our mental health laws (right now those with psychological issues can refuse treatment), the carrying out of executions is extremely rare. And while these mass killers acting on stupid ideology may look forward to going down at the event as a martyr to their cause, it is clear they want to avoid a speedy trial and execution. The Fort Hood shooter is a prime example. When convicted in this age, the guilty can (and do) look forward to umpteen years of sitting in prison, having their every need paid for by the public, the leisure to "get right with Jesus", being treated as celebrities by their sicko fans and the anti-death penalty people alike, and sometimes even being granted the privilege of marrying one if their fan-girls. Even if we allowed the government to confiscate every gun owned by legal carriers, this will not deter evil people from creating homemade bombs or driving trucks through crowded streets or just going on a knife-wielding rampage. The public needs and deserves the assurance these twisted people will be facing quick justice. We have gone too long treating these murderers with kid gloves and seeing those in power use the tragedies for political gain.

Exactly.

Yes, but killing people publicly is gratuitous.

Then make the choice to close your eyes - a choice not offered to the victim whose last dying image was the killer coming for them.

Except it hasn't? Re: Texazz & Fla.

The punishment for any high crime in Zimbabwe is execution. Now on a scale from one to African Dictator, how corrupt and/or safe do you think Zimbabwe is?

Shootings are bad summing it up but what can we do to stop them at this point u keep making the same points but saying it differently

We don’t need that it won’t help and I think u know that

It wouldn’t based on the way these shootings are occurring

That’s your perspective I have mine

How do you think public executions are going to help now because things are different

nope.

We just need gun regulation like in any normal country.

They owned slaves and didn't let women vote. We changed their shit because it was f**ked up.

We changed what the Constitution said.

Some people owned slaves and the rest were cool with it. Now we aren't.

I am not cool with the mass shootings. You are.

They were? Jefferson & the rest of the slave owners went abolitionist at the age of 145?

Idiot.

"Timber1972

The rest weren't "cool with it." The abolition movement and the Founding go hand in hand."

Course ya didn't, them jus' had reeeeeeeeally long handsssss........

Actually I'm repeating you, Dimby:

"Timber1972

The rest weren't "cool with it." The abolition movement and the Founding go hand in hand."

Gimme some o' dat ol' timey Kumbaya fer tha centuries, Dimz

They allowed New Joisy to slip by with it for a whole 31?

Yes, a mere 90 years later, liberty was somewhat applied to the chattel of slavery.
That is so awesomating, guiye.

G-G-Golly, ya sure got me!

You get rejected by even prostitutes at yer local truck stop, don'tcha?

Regale me with more tales of how the Godly Founding Fathers only intended them God given inalienable Rights (codified into law strictly for reading purposes only) to be only temporarily given only to rich land owning Protestant English, Scotts and German males while they consulted God on how to apply them to the rest of the cretins over the following centuries.
Like us womenfolk, what year was that again?

C'mon, smugypoo, indulge me with your in-depth knowledge 'bout this century spanning staged applicationing of our inalienable God given rights tha Founding Fathers chanced upon...

Erm, you might want to read it, from the B-E-G-I-N-N-I-N-G of ye olde sentence thingy.

It's one sentence.