War criminal always pushing for more war.

I have no respect for neither weaklings nor war mongers, and Bolton is definitely the latter.

You fight if you have to fight, who you don't do is listen to a sold out moron that's been pushing for the same war for 20 years, even writing articles titled 'Bomb Iran' advocating a preemptive first strike, when they've been consistently wrong about everything. I only hope Trump is using him to intimate and doesn't take him seriously.

Agreed.

*intimidate

So Trump's bluster and sending an armada there is fake newz?

I knew Trump would get elected in 2016, and I knew then he'd start a war with Iran by 2020.

Not fake news, but I'm hoping it's just saber rattling. He was doing the same with NK. And with his 'strike' against Syria. I'm just hoping he's smart enough to stand against the chickenhawks but what's the point of building up the military if you're not going to use it. Wesley Clark talked about invading 7 countries 20 years ago.

https://youtu.be/TjvTAuBKCuo (1:44 long)

If he wants re-election, he'd better be smarter than that. Alot of what he's promised can be 'excused' by having both parties against him, but that broken promise would be squarely on him. Especially if it's some bs excuse and especially if it goes badly. The days of bs like Tonkin bay are gone. People today aren't mindless boomers only getting news from the few news outlets they had back then. Well, some aren't. I hope you're wrong.

1. Trump didn't send a ton of warships with 100,000 on them set to go to NK.

2. NK has nothing anyone - not even SK - wants, unless one wants war with China and Russia, NK's backup.

3. Iran has no backup. Other than Syria. Little Syria. Little at civil war Syria.

4. No one likes Iran enough to care. Except maybe Armenia because Iran is the only one that cares about them much. So unless Armenia can disuade us...

5. Iran is on Trump's Islamic flight ban list because it, like the others on the list, are coincidentally isolated rogue nations with a wrecked gov'ts & economies & little or no international relations.

6. Iran has a lot of oil & natural gas, sales restricted by our sanctions.

7. It just came out recently Iraq was just a warm up for Bush, Iran was next.

8. Face it, most Americans thought Iraq was Iran. Been itching for payback since 1979.
This is it.

9. Trump wants to get reelected. It worked for Bush...

10. Who needs the Bay of Tonkin when aluminum irrigation tubes will do?

11. Wars winding down or basically not really happening in Iraq, Afganistan, Syria, Yemen, and the military industrial complex needs something to justify throwing money at it.

President Trump has the Keystone now. Q of which President Trump is Q+ have it all....HAMR time.

The Deepstate own Iran...always have....use to have North Korea as their little puppet too....President Trump freed Kim Jung Un from the Deepstate.....
Where were the Jung Un children educated? Where were they really educated.?

You do realize what Iran, NK and Syria have in common?

Um, no.
TRUMP FREED KIM! Classic. *pats head*

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

That's IraQ, not IraN.

To be fair, i was bashing Bolton for his warmongering with the Iraq war.

I was referring to his quotes from Dems re: Iraq.

he said same thing in iraq

But you were quoting Dems there.

Not much, they'll 'begrudgingly' go along with it too because, um, uh, one day the GOP will, um, uh, return the favor! Yeah, that's the ticket!