Oh, I see. This again. First of all, the philosophy of behavior from trauma is bankrupt. Sometimes it happens, sometimes it doesn't, and drawing a cause effect relationship is the same as guessing.
-
Secondly, addressing the next point "you know nothing about" & "say such horrible things"
Before I jump into the center of this one, WHAT horrible things? First of all, I said NOTHING directly about her. Secondly, I implied nothing about her, I implied sex with her is horrible, not the same thing as something directly about her. As all your ex partners could probably attest, you can think someone is horrible in bed and not think they are horrible person.
but the main point with my intro to this paragraph is: moral relativism. Look, unlike you, I feel confident in my intellectual analytic process and my ability to form judgments. I have no guilt burden making me reluctant to pass judgment on others because of discomfort over my own mistakes. I have owned them and dealt with them. However, coincidentally, you ARE right. She IS a horrible person. How do I know this? She has made her vile anti-life positions well known, among her other various idiocies. What's vile is framing taking life away from a developing baby and framing it as reproductive choice. Pro choice? I'm pro choice until conception. This is the 21st century, there are many ways to mitigate the reproductive cycle. "I forgot" isn't worth a life. My position isn't taking anything away from anyone, it's in assuring that BOTH the woman and the developing baby's rights are respected, not giving one the right to murder the other.
Thirdly, it's interesting that you consider death preferable to growing up in an orphanage or being adopted. What does that say about you? If things can't be cushy perfect, it's better to be dead?
BUT mainly this was about showing, it's a good thing, especially for her husband, if no one has sex with such a vile person. After all, she might get pregnant and create another vile person.
Caption this Meme
