Fueling Children's nightmares

Not kidding though, this is the first I have heard of or seen of a new Sonic movie, and I can already see its going to be shit by one image. Sonic doesn't have teeth like that, and his eyes are supposed to be connected. Overall, it pays no homage to original content and is disturbing. -3/10 Would not look upon ever again.

Sonic in the movie, CGI wise, looks like something from the early-to-mid-2000's. Which is really pathetic.

By the looks of it, the only positive thing about the film would be Jim Carry's performance. But one actor isn't enough to save the film.

The Detective Pikachu movie on the other hand actually looks really good and is overall promising. Definitely gonna be worth a watch.

Not Sonic, though. Not Sonic.

Have you seen the design for the new Addams family movies it's a huge slap in the face to fans .

Stop trying to start drama

I don't think he started it. You were the one who said "Why are you stalking my comments."

he wants to get attention, and you might've never seen raydog swearing at me and being a salty rager

the joke is it's a mock review, if you can see, it has a -3/10 would not ever look upon again

Two words. Human. Teeth.

-10000000000000000000000000000/10 would not ever even know about again

The movie Sonic looks like something you'd see on the edge of your bed while having sleep paralysis.

And, oh God. That Cat in a Hat movie was awful.

and actually managed to make the characters look like what they looked like in the comic strip

lol

I see...

is that supposed to be a sonic

Yep.

Ya don't say?

I'm not trying to argue tho

your supposed to use

And is Eggman even supposed to be Eggman? THE REAL DR. EGGMAN IS BALD!!!

Yeah. That bald guy there?

Eggman looks like he's from we are number one.

Well, we don't know how much effort was put it's like looking at a difference between an 8-year-old and a 22-year-old they draw the same thing but prefer the older one despite being on the same time and the other had lifelong practice while the 8-year-old had only a year of practice.
Just claiming one did more can be stupid and biased evidence both copied the source material problem was that many wanted it exactly as the way it is like telling an abstract artist to draw a normal person both were the same problem is that Sonic had a very humanoid look that can be looking horrible than Pikachu who acts more like a mouse

Art is usually interpreted that way, anyway (see modern art and its wide variety of critics). But this was more of a pop culture reference joke to the Nostalgia Critic's review of "The Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog" and "Sonic Sat AM." That said, I do think they made Sonic look too human (opinion) and less like the beloved hedgehog we all loved.

Yep. 😑

DETECTIVE PIKACHU LOOKS SO CUUUUUUUUUTE

Yeah, he is! He looks like something I would want to hug and cuddle with! Sonic, however, looks like something that I would shoot on site!

Exactly!