Then you would be an idiot, because those who question the orthodoxy are actually very intelligent people, familiar with your usual arguments, and have in fact thought of many things you yourself may not have. No further time would have much point.
Ahhh, name-calling over humor on a humor website. What will you think of next? Grammar correction? Spell checking?
Why not just inform us of your inside knowledge of the non vaxxer community's awareness, acknowledgement, refusal to eat, and protest of the administration of vaccines to livestock? Or is it that all non vaxxers are Birkenstock wearing vegans that raise all their own food?
Or could it be more like the environmental enthusiasts that drive their cars to airports to take jets to their zero carbon rallies?
I don't mind someone of superior intellect or able to exhibit greater insight on a subject, but I do take issue with unsupported trolling. It's common and boring.
I'm all for fun, but saying those who learn the truth about the FDA's utter compromise of basic scientific method are too dim to imagine such a thing as animal inoculation walks the line with trolling too, to the point where you should reasonably expect a reply. Fair is fair.
That said, it should be pretty obvious that instead of being something like a religious thing, for others it's a practical thing. If, for sake of discussion, a cow developed an autism-like phenomenon, do you seriously think that either big ag cares, or that it will taste very different? You don't care, and probably neither do they. (Worse, though, the nasty abuses by agroindustry are no longer just ethical, they really do influence health - the side effects of legal but disastrous hormones alone on the American population are an untold nightmare, the truth of which can not be hidden forever.)
Illustrating the point further, if you oppose oppressive labor practices in the states, do you boycott all imported electronics or garments made under them? Since I'd bet not, assuming you'd weakly argue you have little choice, why do you hold others to a different standard?
That's two separate rebuttals. A person of wisdom would take a useful lesson from it.
I'm not going to get into a long argument on the vaccine issue itself. I will just say I used to buy the conventional arguments about harmlessness and necessary herd immunities and the pure motives and scientific practices of the FDA. And then I did research for myself. I recommend the same.
Caption this Meme