soup nazi

Check CSPAN. The house just authorized $5.7 billion for the wall.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?456178-2/house-passes-revised-government-funding-bill-217-185

The gofundme, last I checked was only at 8 million. Congress would still have to give explicit permission for DHS to accept the money.

Almost 12 million just now.

The house just passed a bill tonight 11/20 at 22:16, 217 - 165, authorizing $5.7 billion for the wall. It now heads to the Senate. President Trump may win yet.

You realize it takes 60 Senators to approve?

Yes, it does.

But now if it doesn't pass, the Democrats own it and will need to explain why they are against national security. Democrats will need to explain why they support illegal aliens over citizens. Tough position for Democrats in purple/red areas.

Trump was proud to shut down the government and took ownership of it. His words. Now you are saying it is going to be the dems fault.
Against the wall isn't for illegal aliens. That is where your argument loses all credibility.
Truth isn't truth is a reference to Trump's lawyer rudy guilianni

Yes, he did say that. However, now that the house has passed it, it will be easy to have it come down to the Democrats in the Senate. If the Senate doesn't pass funding for the wall, they have to go back to the house which already passed it. So Trump won't have to do anything.

As far as the wall, the only purpose of the wall is to stop illegals, stop human trafficking, and drugs.

A wall may slow those things down, and give border patrol less to focus on, but I don't believe it will stop them. Still, considering all the things that the US wastes money on, 5B doesn't sound too bad.

5B won't build it. With cost overruns and then maintenance will likely end up as 20B or more.
If 5B wasn't much it should be easy to "fund" it by cutting 5B somewhere else correct? Why doesn't 45 propose cutting something to pay for the wall?

Perhaps he should. But how many would go along with the Commerce Dept, Planned Parenthood, welfare cuts? You don't think he'd cut one of his own projects, do you? He'd likely target Democrat-sacred programs.

I have an idea. Why not use some of that 1.5T tax cut to corporations to fund the wall?

Better yet, sell advertising space on the wall and make the companies maintain their section, like adopt a highway.

You don't have a clue about economics, do you? Because your question makes no sense. You are saying essentially, "why not use some of the money which the government isn't stealing (which is impossible since it isn't the government's money and they aren't stealing it in this case) to fund the wall?
Try again.

You are an idiot

nope, you still fail damaged brain

Trump said he was proud to shut the government down. That is who the people should blame but you can twist it however you want.
Anti-wall isn't pro-illegal and until you can understand that... there is no need to further this discussion.
If you can concede that very simple point, that anti-wall isn't pro-illegal, we can continue to discuss. If not I am done.

When Trump wins. America loses

That is your opinion. Not factual, just opinion.

And your opinion is factual?

Nope, my opinion is always just my opinion.

Only facts are factual. Which is why I disagree with your opinion that America loses if President Trump wins. You have no facts to justify your position.

Truth isn't truth

I don't even know what that means. It is a totally non sequitur. Meaningless to the point of humorous.

I'll explain: good=his brain.