Excellent question.

https://www.businessinsider.com/starbucks-howard-schultz-net-worth-2018-6

Because of the chaos that would ensue if we pulled out. Dam shame

I am old enough to recognize the source of this as the John Birch Society, when the fascists started their attempt to infiltrate America. do YOU remember "Get the US out of the UN?"?

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/16/the-john-birch-society-is-alive-and-well-in-the-lone-star-state-215377

No...38% of UNHRC resolutions have been directed at Israel alone.

The council's agenda for each session has 10 items, 1 ALWAYS about criticizing Israel.

2006-2012 UNHRC condemnation reports:48 against Israel;9 against Syria;3 against Iran.

The Durban conference in South Africa found 1 nation in the enitre world guilty of racial discrimination:(You guessed it) Israel.

Anyone with a brain would be able to see the true face of the UN.

Yeah, Israel treats them so badly, 1/5 of it's population is Arab and can run for Parliament just like every other Israeli citizen.

Well this is all kinds of stupid. Countries make up the UN and countries are political, the resolution did receive a majority but not the two thirds to trigger a 'condemnation' whatever that means.

As for trying to overrun the west with violent third world immigrants just exactly how will it do that? The UN has no responsibility for any borders and does not move people around the world.

The fact that not even 2/3 of the UN condemned Hamas should offer adequate proof of its corruption and anti-western bias.

You need to look up the UN Global Migration Pact. Here's a link for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYn09wrL9vw&t=725s

I don't see how that is anti western bias, Hamas are not a threat to the west and there are a lot of countries for which Hamas means nothing. I doubt Fiji, Bhutan, Nepal or Brunei care about a dispute in a far off country.