Rapist n chief

And what recording would that be? A locker room talk on what a person "likes to do" is now equated to "past tense" action?

Grammar hard for you? This is why you flip burgers for a living and why Democrats like you lost an independent like me.

To be honest the way he said it was more along the line of what he "can do"

What he said doesn't automatically equal assault. It is possible for it to be an assault, but is not literally him saying he assaulted women. Also there is that lack ok women complaining that he grabbed them there, so there are no accusers.

You have a man who has 19 accusations of sexual assault against him, you see the creepy and fetishistic ways he acts towards women (including his own daughter) in his public life, and then he brags about how he can get away with grabbing women's genitals because he's rich. It doesn't take a genius to put 1 and 1 together.

Yea but he is married to Hillary so he gets a pass!

LOL, nice goal post moving. So now what you have is many people called him a witch and he acts strange he must be guilty until he proves himself innocent, and as you didn't actually bother to provide any evidence here it is: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/list-trumps-accusers-allegations-sexual-misconduct/story?id=51956410 Looks like you still do not have your case meet, thus the lack of evidence and goal post moving.

What evidence is this? It's just a comprehensive list of the allegations with no comment on their validity. Nothing about this proves my point wrong, nor does it elevate yours.

I'm going to break this down for you since you seem to have a hard time understanding this. If someone says something along the lines of: "I’m automatically attracted to beautiful. I just start kissing them. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it." That ALONE, even without the pussy grabbing comment is worthy enough of a condemnation against them, because guess what! Making physical advances on someone who did not ask for physical advances still falls under the category of sexual assault. So when you have Person A who is admitting to an act of sexual assault, and Person B who claims to have been assaulted by Person A, then maybe it's not outside the realm of possibility that Person A is guilty of sexual assault. And when the number of person Bs in this case happens to be in the double digits, the question isn't so much "Is Person A guilty?" as it is "How many of these cases is Person A guilty of?"

None of the accusation are equivalent to what you stated and as you're the one advocating the point it is up to you to prove it, rather than for me to disprove it, and as later in the tape Trump asked for a kiss rather than just doing so without permission sinking your point and your still substituting quantity for evidence. Saying they might be guilty and then saying that means they are guilty.

You're also telling women what should by an assault on them without regard to what they feel about it. Your not the one to decide for women, they can decide for themselves. So your definition itself needs work.

And finally you have one again moved the goal post further down from you first comment, meaning you're getting further way from what you believe and still acting as if the first point is supported.

Leslie Millwee https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/19/leslie-millwee-former-reporter-accuses-bill-clinto/ https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/19/juanita-broaddrick-feinstein-had-no-interest-rape-/ there are more but I am sure you wont read the articles

I actually have zero interest in defending Bill Clinton, so you can cut that shit out right now.

But Hillary defends him, a guy way worse than trump

How is someone with four sexual assault allegations worse than someone with 19?

Shocker, she defends her husband rather than a guy who wants to lock her up for deleting emails he colluded with the Russians to find.

because Clinton actually did them!

Well that settles it. Glad to see you pieces of shit are at least willing to listen to women when it suits your own political interests.

pos? sorry i aint clinton..I will listen to women that actually have evidence! If just 1 of Dr fords "Witnesses" said that BK was there, i would have believed her, but her own BFF said No. They didnt even have to say that he did anything, just that he was there but none of her 5 "Witnesses" that she asked to be interviewed said he was there. So are we to believe women at their word?I have a cousin who was severely molested as a child, when she was 18 she told her mom about it and said it was her dad. Her Dad was a federal agent, Marine and his whole family were/is Democratic reps for the city of Philadelphia, he furiously denied it. His wife left him for 1 yr. at age 19 my cousin told my aunt who really did it and her dad was 100% innocent. My Point being, victims often lie or are confused as in my cousins case.BTW she is 50 now and the real molester walks free today.He was also politically connected to the city of Philadelphia.

Kind of like you partisan shitplows think it is fine to completely ignore allegations of sexual abuse when they are made towards someone in your own party. Your hypocrisy stinks like hell

Nobody but butt hurt libtards think he's raped anyone.