Leftist tactics

I never heard it that way before, but I agree.

Very poor quote to use as the right wing has used it for years. Karl Marx, Josepf Goebbels, and, most recently, GOP strategist Karl Rove. You'll find it in his list of strategies to get Republicans elected. The list, in a nutshell is

Tactic #1: Take the Offensive.

Tactic #2: Attack Your Opponent’s Strengths.

Tactic #3: Accuse Your Opponent of What He/She is Going to Accuse You Of.

Tactic #4: Go Negative, Then Cry Foul.

Tactic #5: The “Big Lie”.

Tactic #6: Appeal to Moral Values.

Tactic #7: Sell the Persona.

Tactic #8: Sell an Adolescent Worldview.

Tactic #9: Exploit the Media.
* Exploiting the capabilities of the media.
* Denouncing the Media.
* Controlling the mainstream media through intimidation.
* Imposing limits on “unscripted encounters” with the media.
* Cultivating a network of influential media commentators and media outlets that
supports the agenda
* Exploiting the capabilities of the media.
* Popular culture can serve as a valuable resource for campaign strategy.
* Cultivate ideological media.
* Political campaigns must take advantage of the vast potential of the Internet.

Tactic #10: Create Straw Issues.

Tactic #11: Employ Surrogates.

Tactic #12: Use Emotional Appeals.

Tactic #13: Rely on Expert Testimonials.

Tactic #14: Rhetorical Devices.

Tactic 15: Use of Language.

Rove had quite a playbook. Some of it was in effect as far back as the Reagan Administration. By the time GW Bush ran for office, every one was a part of the GOP playbook. You can see it today with the current president. Hell, even the Democrats tried to use it, but lacked the experience, when they tried to convince party members that Hillary was the best choice. I mean, she had more baggage than the Howells carried for their three hour tour.

When sniping a political ideology, make sure the ideology you support isn't using the same tactic.

I keep tapping upvote but it will only allow me one,,,

Swiggys-back for Prez 2020!

About 25 years too late for that. I'd be better a presidential advisor because I can move among most strata of modern society.

Whatever. I like using the left's tools against them whenever possible, of which Rove was obviously ahead of the curve on.

I'm not trying to make sure everything is nice and neat and proper and fits into pre percieved boxes of properness, I'm making blunt force bullet points that helps the long term destruction of the left in this country and it's treasonous mouthpeice, the "news".

"Getting the biggest idea across using the fewest words, using the picture to help with the idea", I try to conform to that cookie cutter with my memes and no others, but thanks for the idea though.

One problem with that is the failure to understand that cookie cutter meme can backfire easily, as this one was easily negated by my meme reply. Imgur isn't that good for political memes because it doesn't allow a the maker to put a clarification in. Oh, Facebook is a good place for that, as is Wordpress. Even Imgur or Reddit, because you can post a political meme, and follow it with an article that backs up your meme. Here, you may be lucky if a few people comment. The most interesting political memes aren't the ditto-heads that agree with with the poster, but those that can, and do, spark a discussion. Bullet points are for public speaking or a summation of an essay.

Using a meme can spark a good conversation, but, it depends on the persons commenting, This meme sparked no comments: https://i.imgflip.com/2b99z4.jpg .During the last election, I could not get most political meme makers to make a valid case for their candidate. Vote for my candidate because it's not the other candidate. Both sides. With both ends of the spectrum using the same tools, can you say that the right's goal is to make this country a better place for everyone? A look at history shows the result of conservative thinking on a national scale.

1773: the British East India Company (often called the East India Tea Company) had become so powerful that they had convinced the British government to put an end user tax on the tea sold to the colonists to offset the tax breaks they got. The original Tea Party Patriots were liberals that fought against the corporate overlords, hitting them, first, where it hurt most: in the bank book. Why not: TEICo was already hitting the colonists in their wallets. The Conservatives, then called the Tories, wanted things left just the way they were, but those damn liberals decided that they'd had enough. We see how well the conservatives of the time got it's way. Any complaints how that war turned out?

A few years later, across the channel from England, another country had a problem with the conservatives in government oppressing the people. We see how things turned out in France: https://i.imgflip.com/2ah6qy.gif

We had our own uprisings here since 1776. The coal wars in the early 20th century, the Memorial Day Massacre in 1937, Kent State in 1970, and the more recent abuse by those that are to protect and serve during the Occupy movement.

No, a political meme only scratches the surface. be prepared to tell the full story when posting them.

Wow, I've never seen someone give themselves a bl***ob as efficiently as you just did. "as this one was easily negated by my meme reply."

I've found that self congratulatory people are generally lacking in the approval department from others, so they give it to themselves.

Let me try: "This meme I made comparing the left to Nazi's is the best I've ever done, 5 stars regardless of what anyone else thinks".

IDK, felt kind of hollow. I guess I prefer when TRUE approval comes from OTHERS.

Interesting that you cannot dispute the content of my comment. The immediate shift to personal attack is not surprising. When I make statements that are factually offensive to a person's political ideology, it's common for that person to go on the defensive with insults. Like Paul wrote, "When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things." (I Corinthians 13:11)

I offered you a chance to go into detail on what the meaning of the meme was by bringing up a good argument against why it was a bad meme, but since you were not able to dispute my points, you chose a personal attack. All it shows is a tendency towards parroting what others have said without understanding, but without any thought on the subject. Something the immature often do. I understood from reading the meme that you are probably a listener of Rush Limbaugh. How could I make that statement? he is the only person I know of that fears this guy that has been dead 46 years. I'd never heard of him until it was pointed out to me a few years back. Most people on the left would never have heard of him were it not for the right touting his works. I'm more familiar with Abby Hoffman's "Steal This Book" than I am of Alinsky's work. So I went looking for what he wrote, because, if a group fears his words, they must have some power behind them. I didn't look far, but now I've added his book to my list of books to be read.

Blah on McFaculty, you're still trying to critique my meme from stuffy, proper, "oh, but a TRUE fascist is etc etc etc", and then go on to self congratulate yourself over your superior intellect in the matter definatly earned what you woyuld term a "personal attack" and in typical fashion use your decree of my "personal attack" as your coupon to disregard anything further in the post.

From an average joe standpoint, man on the street, eating hamburger tonight not filet mignon, when they see people attacking, and yes it was an attack on Sarah Sanders, they see what I see, brownshirt Nazis, they, and I, don't care about technical definitions, I just know what I see and make memes that reflect that.

Not that he was self congratulating himself, but YOU brought up his superior intellect, and justifiably so. Your jealousy reeks something awful.

Jealousy? How so?

Of course I would critique the meme: that's why you put it out there. I cannot help having a higher intellect than you: I've had 60 years to acquire it. I don't know everything, but I know that, if I don't know something, I try to find the answer. "Superior Intellect", as you call it, doesn't require one to know everything, but the wherewithal to actually look for the answers. That's why this high school dropout ended up with a college degree. It's only an ASc, but it was a step up. Fortunately, I was raised in an environment, as poor as we were, where intelligence was applauded. Maybe it's because my parents weren't dumb as rocks. Sorry to hear your folks wanted to raise a moron. At least they succeeded, so they have that going for them.

Since you say you're a man on the street that eats hamburger instead of filet Mignon, (note: Mignon is capitalized. Your spell checker should have caught you on that. Mine did) you may want to have someone read something called the Powell memo to you. It would explain why you can't afford even a cheap steak. It outlines the plan to destroy the middle class in America. Something that has worked well for politicians, on both sides: it helps them keep their corporate sponsorship so they can hold office. Filet Mignon? Yes, I try to treat myself to that when I can find a really good deal on it. And believe me, I look for the best deals on food that I can find. I was raised to pinch pennies so hard that Lincoln had Boogers shooting out his nose.

Of course, I've never been a "man on the street". I've always avoided being homeless. I spent one summer living in a warehouse storeroom, but I still paid rent on that little room. At least you've got a few months of good weather to save up and get yourself a place.

I'm glad you've never been homeless, I have, it put everything in perspective. It was January of '09, right as Barry was having his first fawned at press conferences that I was eating donated corn flakes at the salvation army because I had to get off the street, it was a cold winter.

I had a 50K as year job too, fixed rate mortage, was just majorly over extended. I didn't plan on it either it just kind of happened.

And so I don't kare wen peeple dont like my reeding or grammer too good. I just don't really care.

You obviously have enough time on your hands and enough fluff around you that you feel you've earned and therefore deserve and have the right to look your nose down on others and critique their writing and ask if they have spell check, I'm telling you man, pleasing you, or anyone else who's gonna try and tell me which words I misspelled is not at the top of my priority list.

I rarely comment on misspelled words. I mention I had a college degree and was a high school drop out. My spelling is at an eighth grade level. When you point out a person's "intellectual superiority", it's not uncommon for your shortcomings to be pointed out.

Let's see, How long was Obama in office in January of 2009? Wow, less than 10.5 days. Plenty of time to clean up 8 years of political malpractice, right? You might want to think again about blaming Obama for your losses: Were you already unemployed in January of 2008, when the unemployment rate was at 5.0%? or did you wait until December when it was at 7.3%. The financial meltdown took a long time to reign in, and didn't drop under 7% until 2012. But stay under 7% it did, dropping to 4.7% by the time he left office. ( source: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000 ) Because of where I live, the economy hit the crapper earlier than most areas: RV industry capital of the world. I already saw things going downhill in 2007. What saved me was becoming disabled in 2008. My operation was in July, got my first disability check in November and was able to ride out the storm. That's partly why I have the time to research. But I've been doing that all along, even when I was working 60+ hours a week. So your argument of blaming Obama for your job loss and becoming homeless is invalid.

Sure, you couldn't fall back on disability. You actually have to be disabled to draw it. And in pretty bad shape, too. Oh, and have a solid work record. But what about if I hadn't been disabled? I would have found work. Actually, I was doing well at the job I was at. Constantly getting praise from my supervisors. The pay was meh, but better than drawing unemployment.

As you stated, also: you had overextended yourself. The Federal reserve stated that about 40% of Americans couldn't cover a $400 emergency. Sorry, but you can't blame Obama for over-extending yourself.

I never blamed Obama for my homelessness once. I said I ended up at salvation army during his first fawning press conferences to get off the street. I blamed my overextended credit, I never blamed Obama, I used him as a point of refference, when talking of what happened I mentioned my over extended credit, I never once blamed Obama.

By mentioning a man who had not taken office as a point of reference, you subconsciously are trying to shift blame for your situation. I notice that you wouldn't use him as a point of reference when you finally landed employment, if you did. Had you said the actual date, January of 2009, the transference of blame would not be needed. You have to understand, what you don't say is often reflected by what you DO say. I know you understand and are trying to back-peddle now, but your meaning is quite plain. It reminds me of the little kid complaining to his mom that his sister started the fight when she hit him back.

If you want to talk politics, it's advisable that you actually do some study on the subject. Listening to political pundits that have to roar their message isn't enough. They do that to disengage your thought process. One reason why I avoid political commentators and blogs. Letting emotional outbursts rule nullifies any discussion you have.

The lefts' tools? Political tools like that have been around forever and used by everyone from the most liberal to the alt-right.

Saul Alinsky's "Rules for radicals" is a bible on the left.

He just wrote them down, such as the bible for Christianity. The ideas and stories were in society just not written down.

Karl Rove's play book is the bible for the right. Both pretty much say the same thing

I hate to sound like a broken record, but...

So commies have rights in America, just not nazi's? What about satanists, do they have rights in america? We all know liberals have whatever right they want to dream up at the moment to fit whatever perversion they're trying to lube into a bodily orifice, but who gave you the right to decide who has rights and who doesn't?

I know I will IMMEDIATLY be accused of being a nazi for "defending" them, but I am curious, in a land where EVERYONE is supposed to have the right to free speech to have thier opinion heard to then be (most likely) shouted down by others with THEIR free speech, it seems the left have singled out Nazi's as the ones we need to shut up and dont deserve the right to free speech, or assembly, unless it is more than the m currently in your scopes.

So who is allowed free speech in leftist Amerika, and who is not? I'd like a list please, just so I can make sure to stay on the proper side of the speech code.

Commies are OK for free speech, Nazis are not. People who are varying shades of brown are OK for free speech, white guys are not, UNLESS they are most militantly gay.

Please explain these modern rules of "civil discourse" to me.

And so would that be people you deem to be a nazi? I mean you could walk through life and on a person by person basis deem them to be a nazi, ipso facto no rights either, get a mob of people together and point out that you've found yourself a nazi, and get a debate going as how best to mob justice them because they have no rights, as a nazi, and because YOU deemed them to be a nazi, all bets are off and no rules apply, is that about the extent of it?

If yes, consider this:

THAT sounds an awful lot like a witch hunter back in the old days of Salem. You're starting to make me believe in reincarnation.

Yeah, and those people are marginal at best. But there are fringe groups for all ethnicities, what about the Black Panthers, why do they always get a pass?

You're thinking of the KKK, which curiously you have not bothered to mention throught this thread. Not Nazi enough for you?

How very bigoted of you to assume me to be KKK with your stellar form of deduction, by the same token I haven't mentioned opus dei yet neither, where does that land me on your suspect list?

"Frankenvoter

How very bigoted of you to assume me to be KKK with your stellar form of deduction..."

Where did I ever say or even imply you were?
Deduction? Confession much?

You said that I "curiously haven't mentioned them anywhere", which I interpreted as a left handed way of implying I have some sympathies for them.

Listen, ass, your last post the people at imageflip only gave me an option to flag it and not respond, and so I am responding here and did not flag. BUT, you keep up with the snarky posts threatening me and I will, my "call out" stands, I want to know where antifa plans to be, so I can be there too. If you are one of those basement living losers of life then I dont give a shit if it hurts your feelings that most people see you as losers, it's what you are.

I never called out anyone directly, I asked if they were antifa and if so where thier little club was planning on being this summer.

I will not respond to you further if you are going to continue with the personal attacks and threats and if it keeps up I will flag the next one, sound good?

"Frankenvoter

You said that I "curiously haven't mentioned them anywhere", which I interpreted as a left handed way of implying I have some sympathies for them."

You know what I said, because you just quoted it there.

Your guilty conscience is your own doing, not mine.

Thanks for playing, was swell.
Nighty night.

"Frankenvoter

I see you're an antifa buttboy yourself. Just let me know where you and your little club will be this summer, that's all I want to know. Antifa are the nazis, and thier followers are punks, go f**k yourself."

"Frankenvoter

And whos calling who out in your reply? I can point out what I said ad naseum to the people who cannot read on this site of which you must be one, I never called anyone out. I asked if they were antifa and if so where they would be this summer. How you and others take it upon yourselves to take that as an affront I have no idea unless you are antifa yourselves and if so my statement still applies. I am getting bored with this line of deflection, why not get the the heart of the matter, why democrats ARE the nazis while running around accusing everyone else of being one? Why not answer that question instead of deflecting?"

You're really NOT pretending to be stupid, are you?

I'm trying to defend my meme and my comment against various people who pop in to call me out, for "calling someone out". I mean, I guess it's ok for people to make a snarky comment about the meme, make assumptions about me in a rude way, and I suppose I', supposed to see that a comment came in, "yep, this dude called me a nazi and a few other things, I hope he had a good berating in his comment and feels better now, and then zip on down the list and never make use of the reply button.

Is that how it works?

"Frankenvoter
Listen, ass, your last post the people at imageflip only gave me an option to flag it and not respond, and so I am responding here and did not flag. BUT, you keep up with the snarky posts threatening me and I will, my "call out" stands, I want to know where antifa plans to be, so I can be there too. If you are one of those basement living losers of life then I dont give a shit if it hurts your feelings that most people see you as losers, it's what you are.

I never called out anyone directly, I asked if they were antifa and if so where thier little club was planning on being this summer.

I will not respond to you further if you are going to continue with the personal attacks and threats and if it keeps up I will flag the next one, sound good?"

Yes, I am a loser, but it sure beats being a prissy backpeddling wimp who's going to cry to mommy if I say more meanie pants things to your mentally deficient snowflake nazi ass. Flag away, dumbass.

"the people at imageflip only gave me an option to flag it and not respond"

Like there's someone observing every post and deciding to give you reply options, you puss gobbling imbecile.

You want to know antifa plans to invade the backwater trailer park and come git yer befuddled wussy cuckold butt? Send em an email, moron.

Never call out anyone if your gonna let them make you their buttboy.

I see you're an antifa buttboy yourself. Just let me know where you and your little club will be this summer, that's all I want to know. Antifa are the nazis, and thier followers are punks, go f**k yourself.

And whos calling who out in your reply? I can point out what I said ad naseum to the people who cannot read on this site of which you must be one, I never called anyone out. I asked if they were antifa and if so where they would be this summer. How you and others take it upon yourselves to take that as an affront I have no idea unless you are antifa yourselves and if so my statement still applies. I am getting bored with this line of deflection, why not get the the heart of the matter, why democrats ARE the nazis while running around accusing everyone else of being one? Why not answer that question instead of deflecting?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2016/jul/29/police-bombing-move-compound-philadelphia-1985-video

Nazis, being the pro-genocide pro-xenophobia retards they are, should never have rights.

I forgot to add the caveat:

" it seems the left have singled out Nazi's as the ones we need to shut up and dont deserve the right to free speech" accusing everyone but themselves of being the nazis, and acting very much like nazis while doing so, hence the meme.

So...even though I disagree with thier opinions, this is America and they still have a RIGHT to it, I know that revisionist history is the best attempt at what it taught these days, but I remember asking my government teacher back during the days of the soviet union why they can just come over here and go to any library and get any info they want when if we went there we'd be arrested for subversive behaviour and you know what he told me?

Because this is America, and that's the difference between us and them, one of them anyway, another being that we have communists running for ballots in America, they don't have republicans and democrats over in thiers, the communist party is all that is allowed.

WE have freedom of speech over here, and so communists can get in the public sqyare and announce thier views, same as you can go DEnounce them, because this is America, and EVERYONE is entitled to thier opinion, so.........

Either you are not good at listening, or your home schooling teacher should be fired.

No, I think liberals only hear what they want to hear, and they only read in the constitution what they want to be in there. They demand everyone see it the way they do, and there is no tolerance from the tolerance bunch when it comes to dissenting opinions.

I was not home schooled that was a public school teacher, and even though I am not a nazi, I still have to know how it is only they are not allowed to voice thier opinion in this country by your standards?

You still have not explained to me how the tactics the left are using are not brownshirt, how they are not BEING the very way they accuse others of and continually seem to think that somewhere in our bill of rights it says everyone has freedom of speech except nazis.

Please show me in the document where you see that, and/or let me know how many cracker jack boxes you had to go through before you got your magic decoder glasses.

I understand that, and you are obviously free to speak your opposition to them, but still, it is American to give free speech to everyone regardless of political view, it is nazi AND communist to decide who does and doesn't get the right to speak.

I am not a holocaust denier, I like jewish people, my opinion of mexicans is they work twice as hard for half the money and when you get right down to it that's peoples biggest problem with them, they are showing us up in that area, those are my own opinions and nowhere near racist or nazi.

Lefty DEMANDS tolerance for thier ideas, one of which is showing NO tolerance for anyone who opposes THEM. How you can not see that as totalitarian and brownshirt is beyond me, but the painting of Trump and his supporters as all nazis is way past it's experation date and you are doing nothing but causing us all to double down on our support.

That's cool too, everyone sees the antics whtehr at a restaraunt or a theater or a softball game, and my guess is it's gonna get worse before it gets better because the realization is setting in that it really IS over, the hope od what would have been with a Hillary presidency sealing the deal, I mean, who would have DARED oppose her re election in 2020, the 100th anniversary of womens sufffrage? It was in the bag, all planned out and people on the left counted their chickens before they hatched.

The deep state should have reversed hillary and Barry. Both were gauranteed 8 years each with little to no opposition with a "phobe" suddix attached to whoever dared stand in the way.

But because they chose Barry first, and she willingly stepped aside waiting for that 2020 smug, Barry just couldn't help himself and turned the heat WAY up on the frogs, and even though any opposition to him was either racist or etc, we still had our chance in '16 and took it.

And if you think about it, Trump actually got the popular vote too, once you discount the illegal and dead from the democrat roles thier numbers drop dramatically.

I was just talking to a lib uncle who is lockstep as the rest and it was nazi racist xenophobe etc etc and blah, he did say one thing I agreed with him on though which was this fall is gonna be huge turnout, it'll almost be like a presidential election and so no matter which way it goes, there will be no saying "too many people stayed home".

But you get your rage on if it makes you feel better, everytime someone is brownshirted out of a restaraumt or a theater or whatever else all it does is get people itchy for November.

And if you think about it, Trump actually got the popular vote too, once you discount the illegal and dead from the democrat roles thier numbers drop dramatically."""

and 100,000 dollars says you have not even read one of the Federalist Papers

PrivateButthole, shut up and go away.

Nice attempt but that was not what he said nor what he meant. He said there were good people on both sides (of the monument debate, not the antifa/klan action).

There are people in that community who have lived there for generations and saw the statue as history, flawed, warted history but history nonetheless, something people can LEARN from when it is not whitewashed (uh oh, better start using another term for that) from the history books.

there are no statues of Benedict Arnold either.

Yeeeeeeeeah, Trump was referring to the people that had a legal permit to protest the removal of a civil war statue but nice liberal talking point. Are you upset Trump called feral and violent antifa commie scumbags 'good people'?

As if not having a permit puts you on the same moral playing field as people who are literally advocating genocide. You call those counter protestors feral and violent, last time I checked they weren't the ones who killed people at that event.

Who's advocating genocide?

It's ok, that sting you're feeling daily, hourly, by the minute on issue after issue not going your way, because Hillary didn't win, you'll get used to it eventually, maybe.

Another "hard right" SCOTUS pick? Check. A red tsunami guaranteed this fall because of the juvenile antics of the unhinged left, check. Generations of "right leaning" decisions from the high court after this next pick AND the next one, after Ginsburg comes to her senses and retires? Check and Checkmate, the left is done done done.

I mean, I expect the hard core to go dormant, kind of like the creature in "the thing", just waiting on an unsuspecting victim to leech onto and start the process all over again.

But in the meantime, and that gives us PLENTY of time to get really on gaurd for the subversive, indoctrinatory tactics of the left who will DEMAND inclusion when they are out of power, but pick and choose who deserves rights when they are IN power, they can just sit and sniffle for oh (looking at watch) the next 6 years at least.

You'll get used to it, maybe, eventually. In the meantime pout away McDuff, there's nothing you can do about it and impotent rage is the funniest rage, at least from my perspective.

That had literally nothing to do with what we were just talking about, but okay.

Same as you continuing to call Trump and his supporters nazi's I guess. I'm just trying to find an ultimate root to the unhinged, and have a feeling what I described is a good part of it.

But yes, I am tired of the Nazi refferances, the whole point of the meme is the left can call Trump and his supporters nazis all day if they want, THEY are the only ones currently acting like them.

I just showed you two instances of Trump supporters being LITERAL nazis. You think those torch wielding fascists in Charlottesville were Hillary supporters? How about the recent nazi gathering in Georgia that was protected by SWAT teams? Trump was endorsed by David Duke (grand wizard of the KKK), Aurthur Jones (former leader of the American Nazi Party), and Richard Spencer (main figure-head of the Alt Right who was literally seen yelling "hail Trump" to a crowd of people throwing up Roman salutes).

If you think the Left are the only ones acting like nazis (which doesn't even make any sense since being on the left makes you inherently anti-nazi) then I have to assume you're deliberately ignoring your eyes and ears.

For whatever reason they are only giving me an option to flag your latest reply, not respond to it so I am responding here.

You still have not explained to me how the tactics of the left today are not brownshirt, because that most definatly seems to fit the bill of "if your rhetoric attracts nazi's, you should rethink your rhetoric".

Secondly, you still have not answered my question, why only nazi's? What about communists, of which the left are always orgasmic over, and in the SOCIALIST soviet republic Stalin murdered much many more than Hitler as did Mao in China, and yet by your logic, regurgitist drones for THOSE ideoligies should have free speech in America, just not MAZIS!, I mean, just watch Schindlers list and see what they did.

So you are saying if there was a movie about what Stalin and Mao did you'd rethink your non condemnation of them?

And again, the only nazis I see these days are on the left, they walk in lockestep, there is one opinion to have and you'd better have it, otherwise you get brownshirted at the restaraunt, at the theater, at the softball game with bullets.

Thought when you deleted your PrivateName account because you embarrassed yourself with your buffoonery that you'd learn your lesson.
But since that lesson involved what a lying fhucktard you are, it's no lesson learned.

You make the most asinine lies up, attribute them to someone who didn't say anything close, then try to put them on the spot by asking them to defend YOUR lie that you made up.

Idiot.

It is clear that we are surrounded by idiots, fellow liberal.

Just because nazi's were supporting trump it is no different than when the black panthers supported Obama AND intimidated voters outside of polling places for him. Are ALL blacks members of the black panthers?

1) There's an unspoken rule that if your rhetoric attracts nazis to any capacity, you should rethink your rhetoric.

2) It makes all the difference in the world because NAZIS! Watch Schindler's List again and name five things the nazis did in that film that the Black Panthers are also guilty of; aside from the use of intimidation.

Hey, if getting called the nazi you aspire to be gives you diaper rash, so much the better.

"But in the meantime, and that gives us PLENTY of time to get really on gaurd for the subversive, indoctrinatory tactics of the left who will DEMAND inclusion when they are out of power, but pick and choose who deserves rights when they are IN power, they can just sit and sniffle for oh (looking at watch) the next 6 years at least."

You forgot what was done to every of Obama's picks for any level position nomination in his administration - all amply qualified, mind you, unlike the swamp muck cronies of your treasonous KGB nazi cult leader - all the way to the last SCOTUS opening in his last year?
Or all is your amnesia truly for realz?

PS: tRump got as many votes as did Romney. Your beloved Hillarat that y'all keep yanking your schlank to lost TWICE because she wasn't liked, despite the crooked shit the DNC pulled to get her the win. They f**ked themselves over, and they're prepping to do it AGAIN in 2020. So sit back and enjoy yourself.
While you still can.

Good luck getting an answer on that.

A little bit, but there is still the pesky little idea that they DO have a right to voice thier opinion, so that others can shout them down. The only people it seems are not allowed to have an opinion in America today are white heterosexual Christian males, who get called anywhere from bigot to Nazi when they don't go along with the group think.

Oh, yeah, we should all have freedom to voice our opinion. But it's only one side using fascist tactics to curtail speech, like you say, yet they have so much cognitive dissonance they think they are being wronged. The last few years have shown me how the communists last century got so many people to murder over 100 million for their sick cause.