If adults are pushing elementary students into "gun control" marches why wouldn't we believe that adults have been grooming/conditioning these Parkland teenagers to have these anti-liberty ideology?
[deleted]
1 up, 7y,
1 reply
"Anti-liberty." Yes, because nothing screams freedom quite like bleeding out on the floor of a first grade class room. Are you seriously implying that elementary school teachers have some kind of ulterior motive outside of not wanting to see their students murdered in front of them?
Anti-liberty because if the laws already in place were implemented and followed the Parkland shooting would not have happened. So there is no need for more laws and regulations that would infringe upon the liberties of law abiding citizens. If the school, count sheriff's office, county health department, and FBI would have done their job, Parkland never would have happened.
I am stating the fact that teachers are using their elementary students as props in their political agenda. Those children are doing what they are told. Just when children march with adults at "pro-life" rallies, those children are told to go there and given signs. In both cases the children are brought there by adults to appeal to the emotions of others, plus the children being there and being exposed to the adult's rhetoric conditions those children and grooms those children for believing the same ideological rhetoric.
I'm not even "implying" that most of the adults are doing that purposely. I am stating that is what is happening, therefore we have reason to believe that the Parkland students have been conditioned/groomed the same way and are now, in the words of Rahm Emanuel "not letting a good tragedy go to waste" and are fulfilling the role of political ideologues who are willing to give up their liberties and cause the liberties of others to be taken away for their ideological agenda.
Then of course there is the whole issue of who funded all of those people getting to DC or the various state capitols?
Yes, the 2nd helps keep the 1st..... just as a fyi: there are many people out there now who want to ban all 'guns' --but claim they don't... A rule of thumb: if a person starts a conversation with "I support the 2nd Amendment, but....", they probably really support total gun ban, but slyly realize they shouldn't reveal it..... It's really an asinine waste of time, because soon (with 3d printing and other technology) people will be more able to construct weapons... AND 'guns' that don't involve the use of explosive charges and projectiles will are also quite a possibility... So the whole definition of what's a gun or a weapon will eventually change...
Some people will protest anything... this is exactly why the 'Ban Di-Hydrogen Monoxide Petition' Joke (still) exists... certain areas of the web know it well enough, but if you walked around a 'Protest' with a clip board you'd rack up the signatures
[deleted]
2 ups, 7y,
2 replies
Di hydrogen monoxide is responsible for countless suffocation deaths and the destruction of Puerto Rico's infrastructure. How can you possibly allow such a chemical to exist in the world without proper regulation?
No, there is not such irony. And no, it is not trying to kill anything. That's silly.
But for the sake of... even if it magically was, the First Amendment is still the first, as well as the reason for the emergence of the Federation of the USA.
[deleted]
1 up, 7y,
1 reply
People are holding protests to ban guns. I'm starting to believe that you're just a troll...
Don't forget to put in what you said as well for context - what is was a reply to, and your incoherent reply to that.
[deleted]
2 ups, 7y,
3 replies
First amendment: freedom of religion, speech, press, and organized demonstration.
Second amendment: The right to keep weapons and have militias.
The second amendment was put in place to keep our own government from taking away our freedoms, such as religion and speech, or exploiting us.
Currently, our right to organize and use our free speech is being used in an attempt to dismantle the second amendment.
If this happens it's only a matter of time before the government will take away the rights of the first amendment. There will be no way for the citizens to resist so the government will not have to worry about the consequences.
You may not appreciate the gun owning idiots but we're the reason your government allows you so many freedoms.
I didn't get past three words, but as mine posted, I saw this hilarious bit:
"You may not appreciate the gun owning idiots but we're the reason your government allows you so many freedoms."
The heck you talking about? You're just some drunken fatso who can't find his little pecker beneath that hanging tub who thinks playing video games is prepping you for WWIII. You haven't done shit for me or anyone else anywhere.
Done with this wussy clown.
You couldn't cross the street here without getting your fat trailer trash ass killed. Nite, tubs.
Perhaps actually reading and studying the history of the origins and effects of the American Revolution would help, instead of dismissing it all as 'shooting gophers'...
[deleted]
3 ups, 7y
This guy's as dense as lead. I'm 90% sure he doesn't know the difference between a militia and a military or why the US revolution happened.
Grind & these other bumpkins fought in the revolution?
[deleted]
2 ups, 7y,
1 reply
It's not what I've done, it's what I and others like me will do if the government tries to screw us. We'll risk our lives to protect the rights of the US citizens. Even the stupid ones.
Read this today. Spot on comment about the ignorance of our young people in America. If you are reading this and you are a high school - college freshman age US citizen, inform yourself about the atrocities of these men and their movements, some of which were fomented by the youths of their nations.
Caption this Meme
