No police report. No explanation why the 11 & 30 year wait ... except the need for an October surprise.

I'll jut run for president

I'd vote for you.

Thanks

You got everything right except for the "equally" part, trump has no plans, and no idea what to do. I don't think he's really thought this through.

It's pretty clear he was running for attention and didn't expect the GOP to lose it's minds and actually give him the nomination. Insiders of his have said so. Now he thinks he can win it and rule on his whims... I'm voting for neither, because the same good conscience that prevents me voting Trump forbids me to vote Hillary. But I almost hope we get Hillary ONLY because she's a known quantity. Trump is not and does not play by the good rules and will turn his stupidity on anyone friend or foe.

she's a known quantity? she's a known psychopathic habitual liar who accepts money from anybody and who's ready to take your country into another war you won't win. do you read the wikileaks?? :-o

Still more known than Trump. I don't want either.

It doesn't bother you that your next president could be a habitual liar who wants to go to war? Seriously? Please, tell me what's so bad about Trump?

Yes, it bothers me completely. But both of them are unfit for the office. So America loses no matter which of them is elected. Just in different but equally horrible ways.

Read all my comments already on this thread to see my objections to Trump.

i have read them, but you haven't actually said "why" you think he's unfit.

Then you haven't read them. I'm not retyping everything. But in a nutshell, he's a liar, a deceiver, a flip-flopper. His moral character is reprehensible. And that's all based on 2016 and the primaries and campaign. Not stuff from years ago which only reinforced it.

Clinton flip-flopped on Gay Marriage, TPP, NAFTA, Iraq, she was also complicit in the lies against Iraq which caused a war. She tried to destroy the lives of the women who accused her husband of rape. She lied in public about Benghazi, she lied in public about her emails and she lied to congress about both. She's also lying about her relationship with Putin, her leaked emails show that she was telling people in private that she has a great relationship with him. She's a habitual liar.

and i did read your comments. you said he was Unfit, would rule on his own whims and doesn't play by the rules. but there's nothing specific to back any of this up.

You're right... sorry... that was all on another thread (LOL!)

Trump is pro-choice (per his actual record and history), for ObamaCare Single Payer and other non-conservative positions. He's lied all throughout his campaign and maligned good men with his scorched earth statements.

He demonstrated lack a character, morality, integrity, and a knee-jerk reaction tendency to just say what's on his mind and who cares about the effects.

Neither is fit and neither worthy of my vote. Let the Trump supporters support him and the Hillary supporters support her. God will punish the USA with one of them for sure.

;)

That's my personal view from abroad ...

I dunno, if I see a 46 yr old man talk about a ten yr old like a future conquest, I would probably ask him wtf, after I've already dropped him.

"Wee-Ew..Wee-Ew..Wee-Ewww" LOL!

Sweden the GLOBALIST dream land

Oh its ON.

EXACTLY!

The realm of Imgflip is where Memeageddon will be, for the political memes on the front page has never reached 3.

so it makes it less true? Or awful?

What if a woman dear to you was assaulted and kept quiet for fear until they had enough silence?

Who are you to judge?

And we're to believe:
A. A flight attendant offered first class seating to someone in coach ... randomly
B. That her completely inaccurate description of the first class seating configuration is legit
C. That she was assaulted over and over in front of other passengers and crew
D. That none of the crew, nor she said a word to him about it ...
E. That she let him finish and then returned to her coach seat
F. That she said nothing ... for 30+ years ... to anyone.

If you believe her, I have some oceanfront property you may be interested in. It's in Kansas..

Actually, yes it probably is less true. When the timing of an accusation CLEARLY has a motive attached (such as hurting a candidates chances) then the accusation is naturally more suspect than if it had come out sooner, or even later. It is timed to be talked about so close to the vote that there is no time to verify details, or prove them false. (In some cases these types of accusations are proved impossible based on timelines of who was where when).
Now, it is possible that the accusations are true, but even then the motive for coming out with it NOW (as opposed to when police could have actually investigated it) is clearly not closure, but is politically motivated, and is naturally suspect.

By the way, I am a woman. I am not a rape victim, but was molested as a child. I am a strong believer that victims have a responsibility to report sexual crimes as soon as possible. Rape is exceptionally difficult to prove, and as time passes, evidence fades. I also am a believer that rape claims should not necessarily be taken at face value.
I had a friend in college who regularly had drunken sexual encounters (which she initiated). She decided one in particular was rape (but the others were not). When she told me about it, it was exactly the same as her other encounters. It took me awhile to figure out what was different (I thought about it because I was also friends with the guy she accused). The only difference was that the guy in question, was black.
So, sometimes the difference between consent and rape has nothing to do with the encounter itself.

Thank you for being honest and open. It must have been real difficult for you to overcome this. I commend you. I'll continue to pray for your healing.

You can't measure the truthfulness of something (especially sexual assault) based on time frames. People repress for many reasons.

Women come out of the woodwork on Bill Cosby decades later all with the same stories.
Same for Bill Clinton.

And I am sure you think they are all true.

Timing of Trumps accusers could be retaliatory since NOW he is most vulnerable, whereas in the past they felt like it was pointless. Revenge is sweet. And they deserve to do it when they feel right about it.

https://i.imgflip.com/1c9r6w.jpg

And when were those accusations leveled (and then ignored)?

I'm talking about the one from Oxford, which by the way cannot be true. Clinton travelled to the UK the year after he was supposedly banned, as well as several other times both before, during, and after his presidency.

What I mean by timelines, is that some accusations claim to have taken place at a time and place where you can prove that the accused was in another state altogether at the time an incident is alleged to have occurred.

I hate this election. But you sound like Trump usually does; full of excuses and "poor me, the-media's-biased-against-me" bullshit.

The guy's a dirtbag. The girl's a scumbag. It's a lose-lose. But don't cry "foul" when the Clinton campaign had NOTHING to do with these women letting the world now just what kind of "man" Trump truly is. Boo-f**kin-HOO.

One thing you can always count on, when the Left levies a charge, they've already done it in spades.

I guess you forgot about "the vast Right-Wing conspiracy" -- which was said by Hitler-y ... and she was serious (haha! yes she was serious ...)

The Clinton campaign "had nothing to do with these women" -- sounds like you're counting your chickens before they're hatched. Give it time. It'll come out.

Clinton is by far and away the MOST corrupt person to EVER run for the office.

This guy's talking about the most corrupt "by far," when I doubt ANYBODY CURRENTLY ACTIVE IN HIGH-LEVEL AMERICAN POLITICS will be as horrifyingly corrupt as that fat piece of shit DICK CHENEY. I'll just throw out a couple "buzz words" and you can get right on fact-checking em: Halliburton. The WMD Case presented to the UN. Oil executive. Aide shotgun blasted in the face while clay shooting.

You know the difference between the "maybe, possibly, I dunno, could be guilty" ranting and whining of guys like Bob and his GOP horde, and the PROVEN true?

All that shit I brought to you about Cheney is true. The stuff against Hillary (for the most part) is mere desperate, pathetic speculation. And I don't even LIKE the broad. It just is was it IS.

the stuff about Hillary is all true...and there's a lot worse to come ;-)

What a stretch.
You bring up Haliburton's special treatment, I can bring up the 20+ banks she gave 20 minutes speeches to for $250,000 each ... or the Bimbo Eruptions ... or the pay for play scandal ... or Whitewater ... or cattle futures ... or Vince Foster ... or the Rose Law firm records ... or Travelgate ... or her illegal email server ... or the IRS scandal ... or the FBI files scandal ... or the Norman Hsu scandal ... or Bill spending copious amounts of time on the private island of a known child rapist/molester ... or the Jorge Cabrera scandal ... "I landed under sniper fire" scandal ... or the “damage, theft, vandalism and pranks” when the Clintons left the White House (to the tune of $190,000) ... or the Benghazi scandal ... or the fact that she floated the "Obama is a Muslim" story (see leaked Wikileaks emails) ... or the the Clinton Body Count ... the list just goes on and on and on and on ... oh I know ... just "desperate, pathetic speculation."

Open your eyes.

WMD Case? SHE VOTED FOR THE WAR.

Cheney was an oil executive? So what? I know a lot of them.

Aide shotgun blast to the face? You've never been dove hunting have you? It was an accident according to the attorney general. Talk about innuendo and pathetic, desperate speculation ...

Your blind, white male rage against Hillary is obvious. Since you weren't paying attention, I'll say it again: Hillary..is..a..scumbag. I'm not a fan of her. So your fire-breathing diatribe just made you look kinda-sorta f**kin crazy.

MY choice was Bernie. And if he WASN'T robbed by the DNC, this wouldn't even BE a contest. Bernie would've BURIED Trump. Early.

Now go find something else to do with your life. Or...you know..go GET one.

LOL in one breath you ignore the WikiLeaks email about Hitler-y then in another quote it regarding the DNC robbing Crazy Bernie.

Then you resort to the typical 'get a life' stupidity and go straight to the expletives. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

Only trust sites that match your preconceived narrative ... noted.

Leave it to a trump supporter to make stupid nicknames that they blindly rage against in a republican mob.

Oh, I'm sorry... I forgot "Blackwater." He got rich off THAT, too.

Well that didn't take long...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-clinton-camp-posting-fake-sexist-trump-job-ads-craigslist/

I saw your "credible link", so I did a quick bit of research...

From: rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit

"The Gatewood Pundit is a HARD-RIGHT WEBSITE that spends most of the day complaining about Barack Obama and liberals, and the occasional flirtation with rumors, unsupported "reports"....

Good game, Bob. Better luck next year.

Except ... it's true. And you don't want to face it. The emails are leaked from Wikileaks not made up by the Gateway Pundit (which is regularly quoted by lots of media).

It scares you, doesn't it? The idea that you're wrong.

Better luck next time. The facts are on my side. "Desperate pathetic speculation" on yours.

Your weblink is BOGUS. I don't care what "source" they cite; they always twist or misquote them; Gateway Pundit, The Blaze, Breitbart....blah,blah,blah: All multi-discredited and debunked GOP trash mags.

Stop digging in the virtual dumpster, Bob. Before you get worms. You don't want worms, do ya? lmao

LOL!!!
I did a "quick bit of research" on your rationalwiki page HAHAHAHAHA! What a bogus bunch of whiners.
Gateway Pundit has exponentially more credibility that your little rag.

Try again Einstein. This time with brains, logic, and common sense.

HAHA! Still laughing AT you ... HAHAHAHAHAHA!

I'm always gonna get the last laugh, and here's why: Trump IS gonna lose this election. So all your snarky comments will be comic fodder for months to come. I can come back to them anytime I want, to smirk at.

But I gotta hand it to ya; you emulate the same retardedly loyal dedication to your failing hero as KellyAnne Conway.

So kudos.

What's comical is your inability to express yourself coherently without expletives. After your old rich white man Bernie was duped, you were duped, and all your precious little snowflake, clueless friends were duped by the global elitists into thinking you had a chance, all you have is some weird hope that the big bank's best friend is elected.

But you can't see it because you don't want to believe anything from a website with views that contradict your own.

Trump may lose, I concede that, especially when every single powerful and rich person is against him.

Is is NOT TRUE that Hillary gave dozens of secret speeches to Wall Street Banks for massive compensation?
Is it NOT TRUE that she refuses to release her transcripts of those same speeches?
Is it NOT TRUE that leaked emails reveal her affinity for the same system that Bernie railed against?
Is it NOT TRUE that she voted FOR the Iraq war and that as a senator, she had access to all the intelligence?

I could go on and on about how Hillary is the opposite of Bernie but I don't want to tax your system or cause you to get triggered so bad you have to go to your safe space.

You realize that trump said he was for the Iraq war as well? Stop being mindless, dude.

FALSE. You're referring to the Howard Stern interview where he was asked if he was for the war. He replied, "I dunno, I guess so." A very weak reply. Shortly after that he was full on against it.

Stop being mindless and do a tiny bit of research.

Hillary had access to all the intelligence information and still voted for it.

Not false actually, and let's pretend for a second that *he* didn't do his research, why would he have given a response at all instead, I don't know, weak words for a weak man.