No police report. No explanation why the 11 & 30 year wait ... except the need for an October surprise.

No police report. No explanation why the 11 & 30 year wait ... except the need for an October surprise. | BECAUSE NOTHING CAUSES YOU TO FINALLY REPORT AN ASSAULT FROM 30 YEARS AGO LIKE A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN | image tagged in memes,futurama fry,nextfaketrumpvictim | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
6,518 views, 137 upvotes, Made by BobParker 19 months ago memesfuturama frynextfaketrumpvictim
Futurama Fry memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
[deleted]
19 ups, 3 replies
BOTH TRUMP AND CLINTON ARE EQUALLY UNFIT FOR PRESIDENT | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
8 ups, 1 reply
I'll jut run for president
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I'd vote for you.
reply
[deleted]
1 up
Thanks
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
You got everything right except for the "equally" part, trump has no plans, and no idea what to do. I don't think he's really thought this through.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
It's pretty clear he was running for attention and didn't expect the GOP to lose it's minds and actually give him the nomination. Insiders of his have said so. Now he thinks he can win it and rule on his whims... I'm voting for neither, because the same good conscience that prevents me voting Trump forbids me to vote Hillary. But I almost hope we get Hillary ONLY because she's a known quantity. Trump is not and does not play by the good rules and will turn his stupidity on anyone friend or foe.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
she's a known quantity? she's a known psychopathic habitual liar who accepts money from anybody and who's ready to take your country into another war you won't win. do you read the wikileaks?? :-o
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
Still more known than Trump. I don't want either.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
It doesn't bother you that your next president could be a habitual liar who wants to go to war? Seriously? Please, tell me what's so bad about Trump?
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
Yes, it bothers me completely. But both of them are unfit for the office. So America loses no matter which of them is elected. Just in different but equally horrible ways.

Read all my comments already on this thread to see my objections to Trump.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
i have read them, but you haven't actually said "why" you think he's unfit.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
Then you haven't read them. I'm not retyping everything. But in a nutshell, he's a liar, a deceiver, a flip-flopper. His moral character is reprehensible. And that's all based on 2016 and the primaries and campaign. Not stuff from years ago which only reinforced it.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 1 reply
Clinton flip-flopped on Gay Marriage, TPP, NAFTA, Iraq, she was also complicit in the lies against Iraq which caused a war. She tried to destroy the lives of the women who accused her husband of **pe. She lied in public about Benghazi, she lied in public about her emails and she lied to congress about both. She's also lying about her relationship with Putin, her leaked emails show that she was telling people in private that she has a great relationship with him. She's a habitual liar.

and i did read your comments. you said he was Unfit, would rule on his own whims and doesn't play by the rules. but there's nothing specific to back any of this up.
[deleted]
2 ups
You're right... sorry... that was all on another thread (LOL!)

Trump is pro-choice (per his actual record and history), for ObamaCare Single Payer and other non-conservative positions. He's lied all throughout his campaign and maligned good men with his scorched earth statements.

He demonstrated lack a character, morality, integrity, and a knee-jerk reaction tendency to just say what's on his mind and who cares about the effects.

Neither is fit and neither worthy of my vote. Let the Trump supporters support him and the Hillary supporters support her. God will punish the USA with one of them for sure.
reply
1 up
;)
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
3 ups
reply
6 ups
That's my personal view from abroad ...
reply
[deleted]
11 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups
reply
6 ups
I dunno, if I see a 46 yr old man talk about a ten yr old like a future conquest, I would probably ask him wtf, after I've already dropped him.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
"Wee-Ew..Wee-Ew..Wee-Ewww" LOL!
reply
4 ups
reply
2 ups
Sweden the GLOBALIST dream land
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
reply
1 up
Oh its ON.
reply
0 ups
EXACTLY!
reply
3 ups
reply
1 up
reply
[deleted]
0 ups
The realm of Imgflip is where Memeageddon will be, for the political memes on the front page has never reached 3.
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 2 replies
so it makes it less true? Or awful?

What if a woman dear to you was assaulted and kept quiet for fear until they had enough silence?

Who are you to judge?
reply
7 ups
And we're to believe:
A. A flight attendant offered first class seating to someone in coach ... randomly
B. That her completely inaccurate description of the first class seating configuration is legit
C. That she was assaulted over and over in front of other passengers and crew
D. That none of the crew, nor she said a word to him about it ...
E. That she let him finish and then returned to her coach seat
F. That she said nothing ... for 30+ years ... to anyone.

If you believe her, I have some oceanfront property you may be interested in. It's in Kansas..
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
Actually, yes it probably is less true. When the timing of an accusation CLEARLY has a motive attached (such as hurting a candidates chances) then the accusation is naturally more suspect than if it had come out sooner, or even later. It is timed to be talked about so close to the vote that there is no time to verify details, or prove them false. (In some cases these types of accusations are proved impossible based on timelines of who was where when).
Now, it is possible that the accusations are true, but even then the motive for coming out with it NOW (as opposed to when police could have actually investigated it) is clearly not closure, but is politically motivated, and is naturally suspect.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
By the way, I am a woman. I am not a **pe victim, but was molested as a child. I am a strong believer that victims have a responsibility to report sexual crimes as soon as possible. **pe is exceptionally difficult to prove, and as time passes, evidence fades. I also am a believer that **pe claims should not necessarily be taken at face value.
I had a friend in college who regularly had drunken sexual encounters (which she initiated). She decided one in particular was **pe (but the others were not). When she told me about it, it was exactly the same as her other encounters. It took me awhile to figure out what was different (I thought about it because I was also friends with the guy she accused). The only difference was that the guy in question, was black.
So, sometimes the difference between consent and **pe has nothing to do with the encounter itself.
reply
5 ups
Thank you for being honest and open. It must have been real difficult for you to overcome this. I commend you. I'll continue to pray for your healing.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 2 replies
You can't measure the truthfulness of something (especially sexual assault) based on time frames. People repress for many reasons.

Women come out of the woodwork on Bill Cosby decades later all with the same stories.
Same for Bill Clinton.

And I am sure you think they are all true.

Timing of Trumps accusers could be retaliatory since NOW he is most vulnerable, whereas in the past they felt like it was pointless. Revenge is sweet. And they deserve to do it when they feel right about it.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
i.imgflip.com/1c9r6w.jpg (click to show)
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
And when were those accusations leveled (and then ignored)?
reply
1 up
I'm talking about the one from Oxford, which by the way cannot be true. Clinton travelled to the UK the year after he was supposedly banned, as well as several other times both before, during, and after his presidency.
reply
3 ups
What I mean by timelines, is that some accusations claim to have taken place at a time and place where you can prove that the accused was in another state altogether at the time an incident is alleged to have occurred.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I hate this election. But you sound like Trump usually does; full of excuses and "poor me, the-media's-biased-against-me" bullshit.

The guy's a dirtbag. The girl's a scumbag. It's a lose-lose. But don't cry "foul" when the Clinton campaign had NOTHING to do with these women letting the world now just what kind of "man" Trump truly is. Boo-f**kin-HOO.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
One thing you can always count on, when the Left levies a charge, they've already done it in spades.

I guess you forgot about "the vast Right-Wing conspiracy" -- which was said by Hitler-y ... and she was serious (haha! yes she was serious ...)

The Clinton campaign "had nothing to do with these women" -- sounds like you're counting your chickens before they're hatched. Give it time. It'll come out.

Clinton is by far and away the MOST corrupt person to EVER run for the office.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 2 replies
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
This guy's talking about the most corrupt "by far," when I doubt ANYBODY CURRENTLY ACTIVE IN HIGH-LEVEL AMERICAN POLITICS will be as horrifyingly corrupt as that fat piece of shit DICK CHENEY. I'll just throw out a couple "buzz words" and you can get right on fact-checking em: Halliburton. The WMD Case presented to the UN. Oil executive. Aide shotgun blasted in the face while clay shooting.

You know the difference between the "maybe, possibly, I dunno, could be guilty" ranting and whining of guys like Bob and his GOP horde, and the PROVEN true?

All that shit I brought to you about Cheney is true. The stuff against Hillary (for the most part) is mere desperate, pathetic speculation. And I don't even LIKE the broad. It just is was it IS.
reply
[deleted]
1 up
the stuff about Hillary is all true...and there's a lot worse to come ;-)
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
What a stretch.
You bring up Haliburton's special treatment, I can bring up the 20+ banks she gave 20 minutes speeches to for $250,000 each ... or the Bimbo Eruptions ... or the pay for play scandal ... or Whitewater ... or cattle futures ... or Vince Foster ... or the Rose Law firm records ... or Travelgate ... or her illegal email server ... or the IRS scandal ... or the FBI files scandal ... or the Norman Hsu scandal ... or Bill spending copious amounts of time on the private island of a known child rapist/molester ... or the Jorge Cabrera scandal ... "I landed under sniper fire" scandal ... or the “damage, theft, vandalism and pranks” when the Clintons left the White House (to the tune of $190,000) ... or the Benghazi scandal ... or the fact that she floated the "Obama is a Muslim" story (see leaked Wikileaks emails) ... or the the Clinton Body Count ... the list just goes on and on and on and on ... oh I know ... just "desperate, pathetic speculation."

Open your eyes.

WMD Case? SHE VOTED FOR THE WAR.

Cheney was an oil executive? So what? I know a lot of them.

Aide shotgun blast to the face? You've never been dove hunting have you? It was an accident according to the attorney general. Talk about innuendo and pathetic, desperate speculation ...
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Your blind, white male rage against Hillary is obvious. Since you weren't paying attention, I'll say it again: Hillary..is..a..scumbag. I'm not a fan of her. So your fire-breathing diatribe just made you look kinda-sorta f**kin crazy.

MY choice was Bernie. And if he WASN'T robbed by the DNC, this wouldn't even BE a contest. Bernie would've BURIED Trump. Early.

Now go find something else to do with your life. Or...you know..go GET one.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
LOL in one breath you ignore the WikiLeaks email about Hitler-y then in another quote it regarding the DNC robbing Crazy Bernie.

Then you resort to the typical 'get a life' stupidity and go straight to the expletives. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

Only trust sites that match your preconceived narrative ... noted.
reply
0 ups
Leave it to a trump supporter to make stupid nicknames that they blindly rage against in a republican mob.
reply
2 ups
Oh, I'm sorry... I forgot "Blackwater." He got rich off THAT, too.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Well that didn't take long...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wikileaks-clinton-camp-posting-fake-sexist-trump-job-ads-craigslist/
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I saw your "credible link", so I did a quick bit of research...

From: rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit

"The Gatewood Pundit is a HARD-RIGHT WEBSITE that spends most of the day complaining about Barack Obama and liberals, and the occasional flirtation with rumors, unsupported "reports"....

Good game, Bob. Better luck next year.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Except ... it's true. And you don't want to face it. The emails are leaked from Wikileaks not made up by the Gateway Pundit (which is regularly quoted by lots of media).

It scares you, doesn't it? The idea that you're wrong.

Better luck next time. The facts are on my side. "Desperate pathetic speculation" on yours.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Your weblink is BOGUS. I don't care what "source" they cite; they always twist or misquote them; Gateway Pundit, The Blaze, Breitbart....blah,blah,blah: All multi-discredited and debunked GOP trash mags.

Stop digging in the virtual dumpster, Bob. Before you get worms. You don't want worms, do ya? lmao
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
LOL!!!
I did a "quick bit of research" on your rationalwiki page HAHAHAHAHA! What a bogus bunch of whiners.
Gateway Pundit has exponentially more credibility that your little rag.

Try again Einstein. This time with brains, logic, and common sense.

HAHA! Still laughing AT you ... HAHAHAHAHAHA!
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I'm always gonna get the last laugh, and here's why: Trump IS gonna lose this election. So all your snarky comments will be comic fodder for months to come. I can come back to them anytime I want, to smirk at.

But I gotta hand it to ya; you emulate the same retardedly loyal dedication to your failing hero as KellyAnne Conway.

So kudos.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
What's comical is your inability to express yourself coherently without expletives. After your old rich white man Bernie was duped, you were duped, and all your precious little snowflake, clueless friends were duped by the global elitists into thinking you had a chance, all you have is some weird hope that the big bank's best friend is elected.

But you can't see it because you don't want to believe anything from a website with views that contradict your own.

Trump may lose, I concede that, especially when every single powerful and rich person is against him.

Is is NOT TRUE that Hillary gave dozens of secret speeches to Wall Street Banks for massive compensation?
Is it NOT TRUE that she refuses to release her transcripts of those same speeches?
Is it NOT TRUE that leaked emails reveal her affinity for the same system that Bernie railed against?
Is it NOT TRUE that she voted FOR the Iraq war and that as a senator, she had access to all the intelligence?

I could go on and on about how Hillary is the opposite of Bernie but I don't want to tax your system or cause you to get triggered so bad you have to go to your safe space.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
You realize that trump said he was for the Iraq war as well? Stop being mindless, dude.
0 ups
FALSE. You're referring to the Howard Stern interview where he was asked if he was for the war. He replied, "I dunno, I guess so." A very weak reply. Shortly after that he was full on against it.

Stop being mindless and do a tiny bit of research.

Hillary had access to all the intelligence information and still voted for it.
0 ups
Not false actually, and let's pretend for a second that *he* didn't do his research, why would he have given a response at all instead, I don't know, weak words for a weak man.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Let me explain your mentality: imgflip.com/i/1cb964
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
Talking about dating someone when they're 20 is a little different (unless you're a Republican -- and then it's worse than murder/rape/corruption).

Of course, you don't think so.

Actually my "mentality" is one of skepticism when it comes to accusations from power hungry politicians.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
What about when they are 16?
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
It's her 'private vs public' position.
reply
2 ups
But it's OK for Trump to trash the same ladies and then invite them to the second debate as ammunition. That's desperate and pathetic!

“I don't necessarily agree with his victims, his victims are terrible,” Trump said. “He is really a victim himself. But he put himself in that position.”

“The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it's just a really unattractive group. I'm not just talking about physical," he said.

“Would it be any different if it were a supermodel crowd?” Cavuto then asked.

“I think at least it would be more pleasant to watch,” Trump replied. -1998
reply
1 up
Dude, this is a f**king great meme. F**k all the b**ches whining about Trump and buying all the bullshit spin about him. You rock dude. :{D
Flip Settings
Futurama Fry memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
BECAUSE NOTHING CAUSES YOU TO FINALLY REPORT AN ASSAULT FROM 30 YEARS AGO; LIKE A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back